Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Mongoose Web Server VS ReactiveX

Compare Mongoose Web Server VS ReactiveX and see what are their differences

LibHunt
LibHunt tracks mentions of software libraries on relevant social networks. Based on that data, you can find the most popular projects and their alternatives. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

Mongoose Web Server logo Mongoose Web Server

Embedded web server with a Web UI builder for your microcontroller powered device. Use our no-code wizard to create your Web UI in minutes.

ReactiveX logo ReactiveX

ReactiveX is a library for composing asynchronous and event-based programs by using observable sequences.
  • Mongoose Web Server Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-03

Mongoose is a network library for C/C++. It provides event-driven non-blocking APIs for TCP, UDP, HTTP, WebSocket, MQTT, and other protocols. It is designed for connecting devices and bringing them online. On the market since 2004, used by vast number of open source and commercial products - it even runs on the International Space Station! Mongoose makes embedded network programming fast, robust, and easy. Features include: Cross-platform: - works on Linux/UNIX, MacOS, Windows, Android - works on ST, NXP, ESP32, Nordic, TI, Microchip, Infineon, Renesas and other chips - write code once - and it'll work everywhere - ideal for the unification of the network infrastructure code across company - Built-in protocols: plain TCP/UDP, SNTP, HTTP, MQTT, Websocket, and other.

  • ReactiveX Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-05-05

Mongoose Web Server features and specs

  • Lightweight
    Cesanta Mongoose is known for its small footprint, making it suitable for devices with limited resources.
  • Embeddable
    It can be easily embedded into various systems and applications due to its compact design.
  • Cross-Platform
    Supports multiple platforms including Windows, macOS, Linux, and even embedded systems like ESP8266 and ESP32.
  • Easy to Use
    Provides a simple API that makes it easy to integrate HTTP, WebSocket, MQTT, and other protocols.
  • High Performance
    Designed to handle a large number of connections efficiently, making it suitable for high-performance applications.
  • Active Community
    A robust and active community that contributes to the library, ensures frequent updates, and provides support.

ReactiveX features and specs

  • Asynchronous Programming
    ReactiveX simplifies asynchronous programming by providing a consistent API for handling sequences of events or data streams. This can lead to cleaner and more maintainable code.
  • Composability
    With ReactiveX, you can easily compose multiple operations on streams using operators, leading to expressive and declarative code. This helps in building complex data pipelines with ease.
  • Error Handling
    ReactiveX provides robust mechanisms for error handling in asynchronous flows, making it easier to build resilient applications that can gracefully handle failures.
  • Backpressure Handling
    ReactiveX offers built-in support for backpressure, enabling systems to handle varying rates of data production and consumption efficiently.
  • Language Support
    ReactiveX is available across multiple programming languages, including Java, JavaScript, Python, Swift, and more, making it a versatile choice for developers working in different ecosystems.
  • Community and Documentation
    ReactiveX has a strong community and extensive documentation, providing ample resources for learning and troubleshooting.

Possible disadvantages of ReactiveX

  • Learning Curve
    ReactiveX introduces a new paradigm for those unfamiliar with reactive programming, and the extensive set of operators can be overwhelming for beginners.
  • Performance Overhead
    The abstraction provided by ReactiveX can introduce performance overhead compared to lower-level approaches, which may be a concern for performance-critical applications.
  • Complexity in Debugging
    Debugging reactive streams can be challenging because of the asynchronous and declarative nature of the code, making it harder to trace issues.
  • Overuse
    There is a risk of overusing ReactiveX for scenarios where it might not be the best fit, leading to unnecessary complexity in simpler contexts.
  • Integration with Legacy Code
    Integrating ReactiveX with legacy codebases that are not designed around reactive principles can be cumbersome and may require significant refactoring.

Analysis of ReactiveX

Overall verdict

  • ReactiveX is widely regarded as a valuable tool for developers looking to leverage reactive programming. Its robust library of operators and ability to integrate with various programming languages make it versatile and adaptable to many project needs. However, it might have a steep learning curve for those not familiar with functional or reactive programming concepts.

Why this product is good

  • ReactiveX is considered good because it provides a powerful, flexible way to handle asynchronous and event-based programming challenges. Its use of observables allows for cleaner, more manageable code that can easily manage complex data streams and handle operations concurrently. This makes it a preferred choice for applications that require high-performance data processing or that need to react promptly to real-time data changes.

Recommended for

    ReactiveX is best suited for developers working on applications that require real-time updates, such as UI frameworks, data-heavy applications, or systems that need to process a significant amount of asynchronous data. It is also ideal for those who are comfortable with, or willing to learn, reactive programming paradigms and want to write more efficient, responsive code.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Mongoose Web Server and ReactiveX)

Mongoose Web Server

ReactiveX

Development Tools
48 48%
Development Tools
52% 52
Javascript UI Libraries
47 47%
Javascript UI Libraries
53% 53
Libraries And Widgets
53 53%
Libraries And Widgets
47% 47
JavaScript Framework
43 43%
JavaScript Framework
57% 57

User comments

Share your experience with using Mongoose Web Server and ReactiveX. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, ReactiveX seems to be a lot more popular than Mongoose Web Server. While we know about 41 links to ReactiveX, we've tracked only 1 mention of Mongoose Web Server. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Mongoose Web Server mentions (1)

  • Janet – a Lisp-like functional, imperative programming language
    Different mongoose in this case: https://cesanta.com/. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago

ReactiveX mentions (41)

  • Kapper 1.3 supports flows - more Kotlin goodness
    Flows are a Kotlin API for asynchronous streams of data. They are similar to Rx Observables, but are simpler and more idiomatic to Kotlin. They are a great fit for asynchronous data processing, particularly for database operations where results may be large or processing needs to happen incrementally. This makes them a perfect addition to Kapper's existing coroutine support. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Hydro: Distributed Programming Framework for Rust
    It looks like a mixture between Akka (https://getakka.net/ less enterprisy than the Java version), which is based on the actor model and has a focus on distributed systems, and reactive libraries like rx (https://reactivex.io/). So maybe https://doc.akka.io/libraries/akka-core/current/stream/index.html is the best fit. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Haskell: A Great Procedural Language
    > Is there any parallel there Of course. Promise is a monad, .then is more or less equivalent to the >>= operator and await makes it look more imperative-ish just like <- in Haskell. Note that in JS you'll need to be inside an async function to use await, just like in Haskell you'll need to be inside the do notation to use <-. Otherwise, you'll need to play with .then just like you would need to play with >>= in... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Understanding DynamicData in .NET: Reactive Data Management Made Easy
    DynamicData is a .NET library that brings the power of reactive programming to collections. It is built upon the principles of Reactive Extensions (Rx), extending these concepts to handle collections like lists and observables more efficiently and flexibly. DynamicData provides a set of tools and extensions that enable developers to manage collections reactively, meaning any changes in the data are automatically... - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • What is your preferred asynchronous programming library?
    Another option is to use the RxJava library in Java. This library uses reactive programming principles to make it easy to write asynchronous and event-driven code. It's particularly well-suited for handling streams of data and allows you to write code that is both efficient and easy to read. Source: about 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Mongoose Web Server and ReactiveX, you can also consider the following products

jQuery - The Write Less, Do More, JavaScript Library.

React Native - A framework for building native apps with React

Babel - Babel is a compiler for writing next generation JavaScript.

Composer - Composer is a tool for dependency management in PHP.

OpenSSL - OpenSSL is a free and open source software cryptography library that implements both the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) and the Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocols, which are primarily used to provide secure communications between web browsers and …

Raven.js - Raven.js is a standalone JavaScript client for Sentry.

Loading...