Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Molly (Signal fork) VS InBrowser.net

Compare Molly (Signal fork) VS InBrowser.net and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Molly (Signal fork) logo Molly (Signal fork)

Molly is an independent Signal fork for Android

InBrowser.net logo InBrowser.net

Transcript anything inside your browser
  • Molly (Signal fork) Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-01-12
  • InBrowser.net
    Image date //
    2025-03-23

InBrowser is a privacy-first transcription tool that works entirely in your browser. It lets you transcribe medias without ever uploading your files. Try it for free and experience hassle-free, high-accuracy transcription directly on your device.

InBrowser.net

$ Details
freemium $15.0 / Monthly (Pro)
Release Date
2025 March
Startup details
Country
France
Employees
1 - 9

Molly (Signal fork) features and specs

  • Enhanced Privacy Features
    Molly builds upon Signal’s already strong privacy protocols by offering features like username-only contacts, which eliminate the need to share phone numbers.
  • Open Source
    Molly is open source, which means the community can review the code for security and contribute to its development, allowing for transparency and trust.
  • Additional Security Layers
    Molly offers additional security features such as increased encryption options and more robust authentication methods to enhance user security.

Possible disadvantages of Molly (Signal fork)

  • Limited User Base
    As a fork of Signal, Molly has a smaller user base which could limit its usefulness for communication compared to more widely-used apps.
  • Potential Compatibility Issues
    Because Molly is a fork, there could be compatibility issues with Signal, meaning updates or feature changes might lag behind.
  • Dependence on Signal
    Molly is reliant on Signal's underlying infrastructure, which could mean vulnerabilities or changes in Signal might affect Molly.

InBrowser.net features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Molly (Signal fork) and InBrowser.net)
Communication
100 100%
0% 0
AI Transcription
0 0%
100% 100
Group Chat & Notifications
AI
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Molly (Signal fork) and InBrowser.net. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Molly (Signal fork) seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 35 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Molly (Signal fork) mentions (35)

  • Technical analysis of TM SGNL, the unofficial Signal app Trump officials use
    That is not true. There is a popular mod of Signal called Molly - https://molly.im/. It allows multi-device access, which I find very useful. I have been using this on Signal network for a long time now. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
  • Buy European Made. Support European Values
    Not if you're using Molly-FOSS, which strips all Google integrations down to a shared library level. UnifiedPush instead of Firebase. OSM for location sharing instead of GMaps. There are de-googled AOSP-based mobile OS's such as GrapheneOS that can be used with Molly-FOSS as well. It's not necessarily the perfect end goal, but for those who are at an earlier phase of their privacy journey, GrapheneOS + Molly-FOSS... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • Signal to leave Sweden if backdoor law passes
    Https://molly.im for a more FOSS and safer fork of Signal. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • More telcos confirm Salt Typhoon breaches as White House weighs in
    GrapheneOS ships binary blobs that run in kernel space. Outside of GrapheneOS, Google and Apple are effectively your systems administrator. The glowies do have access to your Signal chats. Perhaps if you and also others you know run a modified libre branch of GrapheneOS, on different hardware*, and compile the Signal clients from source code, then those Signal chats specifically are secure. But in that case why... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Interview with Signal President Meredith Whittaker
    There's a fork of Signal that supports it: https://molly.im/. - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
View more

InBrowser.net mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of InBrowser.net yet. Tracking of InBrowser.net recommendations started around Mar 2025.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Molly (Signal fork) and InBrowser.net, you can also consider the following products

FluffyChat - Open. Nonprofit. Cute ?

Transcript LOL - Transcribe any Video, Podcast, or Meeting. Summary, Topics and Chat with AI about the content! Also get Twitter posts, LinkedIn post, Blog post, newsletter etc from video or audio.

TeleGuard - TeleGuard is a secure messenger that makes it store that your data or chats are not stored while collaborating or communicating with partners and friends.

aTalk - An encrypted instant messaging with video call and GPS features for android.

Olvid - The most secure messaging app in the world.

HelloChat - This new chat app that comes with great bundles to spike your business and personal life.