Prototyping an API? Waiting for the backend to be implemented? Or setting up test automation? Describe your gRPC services with a single configuration file and use a fake server set up in minutes.
Advanced request matching Use a wide range of matching methods, including RegEx, wildcards, JSON Path, matching against json and yaml files.
Easy response templating We support yaml and json templates, loaded from a file or in-place tamplates right here in a yaml config file.
Security Mock.qa offers a wide range of gRPC credentials for a channel level and a method level security.
Observability Access your mock.qa usage statistics from your dashboard. The mock.qa statistics are near real-time.
Git branches Need a separate server for a branch? Good, mock.qa will create a separate server for every branch you need.
Continuous deployment Mock.qa updates a mock server on each git push you made, so your mock is up-to-date.
No features have been listed yet.
No mock.qa videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Based on our record, TestComplete should be more popular than mock.qa. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Mock.qa is now featured on Product Hunt! Mock.qa is a cloud-based service that offers gRPC and HTTP mock servers. Describe your backend with a single configuration file and use a fake server. Source: over 1 year ago
I've been working with Selenium and Python for the past two years and I can say I've good enough experience with them about now. One thing that has always bothered me is how much manual work I have to do in order to implement the steps I need my program to make. So I've been thinking of making my own "step recorder", something in the vein of TestComplete. I've been using PyAutoGui too and the thought of crossing... Source: over 1 year ago
SmartBear TestComplete and Ranorex both offer 30-day free trials to try them out. Their suites make it easy to automate desktop apps, but licensing is expensive. Part of what you pay for is being able to write "codeless" tests by recording your mouse and keyboard activity and validating whatever you want on the app. Source: about 2 years ago