Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

miracle-wm VS Wayfire

Compare miracle-wm VS Wayfire and see what are their differences

LibHunt
LibHunt tracks mentions of software libraries on relevant social networks. Based on that data, you can find the most popular projects and their alternatives. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

miracle-wm logo miracle-wm

A Wayland compositor based on Mir. It features a tiling window manager at its core, very much in the style of i3 and sway. The intention is to build a compositor that is flashier and more feature-rich than either of those compositors, like swayfx.

Wayfire logo Wayfire

Wayland compositor with 3d effects.
Not present
  • Wayfire Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-19

miracle-wm features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Wayfire features and specs

  • Customizability
    Wayfire offers a high degree of customizability with plugins, allowing users to modify and extend the functionality of the window manager to fit their personal workflow and preferences.
  • Modern Compositor
    Being based on Wayland, Wayfire benefits from modern graphical capabilities and is well-suited for contemporary hardware, with support for efficient rendering and better security features compared to X-based systems.
  • Dynamic Effects
    Wayfire includes a variety of built-in effects and animations, providing users with an aesthetically pleasing environment that can be tailored or disabled as needed.
  • Lightweight
    Wayfire is designed to be lightweight, offering fast performance with minimal resource usage which can improve speed and responsiveness, especially on older hardware.
  • Active Development
    It is actively maintained with continuous updates and improvements, ensuring that users have access to the latest features and security patches.

Possible disadvantages of Wayfire

  • Wayland-Specific
    As a Wayland compositor, it might not yet support all X11 applications natively, possibly requiring compatibility layers like XWayland, which can introduce complexity or limitations.
  • Limited Support
    Compared to more mainstream window managers, there may be less community and documentation support for troubleshooting and user assistance.
  • Plugin Dependency
    While plugins provide flexibility, the heavy reliance on them can lead to compatibility issues or instability if not managed properly, especially for users who want a simple setup.
  • Learning Curve
    New users may encounter a learning curve, especially if they are unfamiliar with Wayland or the plugin-based architecture, requiring time to fully leverage its capabilities.
  • Desktop Environment Integration
    Wayfire's integration with specific desktop environments may be less seamless compared to other managers designed with broader DE support, limiting its appeal for users who prefer tight DE integration.

miracle-wm videos

No miracle-wm videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Wayfire videos

+ Add

GNOME 3.36: macOS-like apps with KAWAII BLUR ..on Wayfire :p

More videos:

  • Review - Wayfire: Wayfire config manager + wf-panel
  • Review - Micro Review 2/2 Rayban Wayfire

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to miracle-wm and Wayfire)

miracle-wm

Wayfire

Window Manager
20 20%
Window Manager
80% 80
Linux
17 17%
Linux
83% 83
Utilities
100 100%
Utilities
0% 0
Desktop Environments
0 0%
Desktop Environments
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using miracle-wm and Wayfire. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Wayfire seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

miracle-wm mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of miracle-wm yet. Tracking of miracle-wm recommendations started around Mar 2025.

Wayfire mentions (2)

  • Cant change the system GTK theme/icons
    So im trying to change my GTK theme/icons (on Wayfire) I tryed changing them using LXAppearance and it "changes" in LXappearance until I close it then they goes back to default (no other application changes themes/icons). Source: over 3 years ago
  • [Wayfire] System locks up when trying to build wf-shell
    Im trying to build/install Wayfire (on Debian Testing, using Openbox) using wf-install and I cant seem to get past building wf-shell (i have also tried building using wf-shell instructions, same result),. Source: over 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing miracle-wm and Wayfire, you can also consider the following products

Hyprland - Hyprland is a dynamic tiling Wayland compositor that doesn't sacrifice on its looks. - GitHub - vaxerski/Hyprland: Hyprland is a dynamic tiling Wayland compositor that doesn't sacrifice on ...

Sway - Sway is a drop-in replacement for the i3 window manager, but for Wayland instead of X11.

Openbox - Openbox is a highly configurable, next generation window manager with extensive standards support.

River - River is a lightweight SaaS-based product. It is built for businesses and designed for teams.

i3 - A dynamic tiling window manager designed for X11, inspired by wmii, and written in C.

Labwc - Labwc stands for Lab Wayland Compositor, where lab can mean any of the following:

Loading...