Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

miracle-wm VS Hyprland

Compare miracle-wm VS Hyprland and see what are their differences

LibHunt
LibHunt tracks mentions of software libraries on relevant social networks. Based on that data, you can find the most popular projects and their alternatives. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

miracle-wm logo miracle-wm

A Wayland compositor based on Mir. It features a tiling window manager at its core, very much in the style of i3 and sway. The intention is to build a compositor that is flashier and more feature-rich than either of those compositors, like swayfx.

Hyprland logo Hyprland

Hyprland is a dynamic tiling Wayland compositor that doesn't sacrifice on its looks. - GitHub - vaxerski/Hyprland: Hyprland is a dynamic tiling Wayland compositor that doesn't sacrifice on ...
Not present
  • Hyprland Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-22

miracle-wm features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Hyprland features and specs

  • Dynamic Tiling
    Hyprland offers dynamic tiling, allowing windows to be organized automatically and efficiently on your screen based on your workflow.
  • Wayland Support
    Hyprland is built on Wayland, providing smoother graphics, better performance, and modern features as opposed to older technologies like X11.
  • Customization
    The environment provides extensive customization options, enabling users to tailor the interface and behavior to their preferences.
  • Active Development
    Hyprland has an active and growing developer community, ensuring regular updates and improvements to the software.
  • Low Resource Usage
    Hyprland is designed to be lightweight, making it efficient in terms of resource usage, which is beneficial for older or less powerful hardware.

Possible disadvantages of Hyprland

  • Early Development
    Hyprland is relatively new and may lack some stability and features found in more mature window managers.
  • Compatibility Issues
    As an early-stage Wayland compositor, some applications might face compatibility issues, particularly those heavily reliant on X11.
  • Learning Curve
    Users new to tiling window managers or Wayland might face a steep learning curve when transitioning to Hyprland.
  • Limited Documentation
    Documentation can be sparse or incomplete, making it challenging for new users to find help or resources.
  • Feature Gaps
    Certain functionalities present in well-established window managers might be missing or underdeveloped in Hyprland.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to miracle-wm and Hyprland)

miracle-wm

Hyprland

Window Manager
17 17%
Window Manager
83% 83
Linux
15 15%
Linux
85% 85
Utilities
23 23%
Utilities
77% 77
Open Source
100 100%
Open Source
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using miracle-wm and Hyprland. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing miracle-wm and Hyprland, you can also consider the following products

Japokwm - A dynamic tiling Wayland compositor (forked from dwl) that makes it a breeze to create custom layouts with a simple configuration. 🚀

i3 - A dynamic tiling window manager designed for X11, inspired by wmii, and written in C.

Sway - Sway is a drop-in replacement for the i3 window manager, but for Wayland instead of X11.

Sxmo - A minimalist Linux smartphone environment that is truly yours to control.

Openbox - Openbox is a highly configurable, next generation window manager with extensive standards support.

River - River is a lightweight SaaS-based product. It is built for businesses and designed for teams.

Loading...