Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Microsoft Operations Management Suite VS JPerf

Compare Microsoft Operations Management Suite VS JPerf and see what are their differences

Microsoft Operations Management Suite logo Microsoft Operations Management Suite

Microsoft Operations Management Suite enables user to gain visibility and control across the hybrid cloud with simplified operations management and security

JPerf logo JPerf

This project gives a better UI and new functionalities to the initial JPerf 1.
  • Microsoft Operations Management Suite Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-28
  • JPerf Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-10

Microsoft Operations Management Suite features and specs

  • Comprehensive Monitoring
    Microsoft Operations Management Suite (OMS) offers end-to-end monitoring and management of an entire IT infrastructure, providing insights into performance, security, and overall system health.
  • Scalability
    OMS is built on Microsoft Azure, which allows it to scale easily according to organizational needs. It can handle the varying demands of enterprises of all sizes.
  • Integrations
    OMS integrates seamlessly with other Microsoft services and third-party tools, enhancing its functionality and allowing for a more cohesive IT management environment.
  • Cloud-Based
    Being a cloud-based service, OMS offers the flexibility and accessibility of remote monitoring and management, which is ideal for distributed and hybrid IT environments.
  • Automation
    OMS includes automation capabilities that can help in reducing repetitive tasks, thus improving operational efficiency and reducing human error.

Possible disadvantages of Microsoft Operations Management Suite

  • Complexity
    The depth and breadth of features offered can make the initial setup and configuration somewhat complex, requiring a steep learning curve for new users.
  • Cost
    While OMS provides a robust set of features, it can be relatively expensive, especially for smaller organizations that might not fully utilize all its capabilities.
  • Data Privacy
    As a cloud-based solution, users might have concerns about data privacy and compliance, depending on the data residency regulations of their country or industry.
  • Dependency on Internet Connection
    Since OMS is a cloud service, a reliable internet connection is essential for its operation. Any internet outage can disrupt the monitoring and management processes.
  • Vendor Lock-In
    Organizations using OMS become inherently tied to Microsoft's ecosystem, which makes it challenging to switch to other platforms without significant migration efforts.

JPerf features and specs

  • User-friendly Interface
    JPerf provides a graphical user interface, making it easier for users who are not comfortable with command line tools to perform network performance testing.
  • Cross-platform Compatibility
    JPerf is built on Java, which allows it to run on multiple operating systems including Windows, Linux, and macOS without modifications.
  • Network Performance Visualization
    JPerf offers graphical representations of network performance, such as throughput and jitter, making it easier to understand the results.
  • Integration with iPerf
    JPerf utilizes iPerf as the backend, benefiting from iPerf's robust network performance testing capabilities.
  • Customizable Testing Parameters
    Users can customize parameters like protocols, port numbers, and bandwidth, providing flexibility in performance testing.

Possible disadvantages of JPerf

  • Abandonware
    JPerf has not been actively maintained for several years, which means it may lack support for new features or bug fixes.
  • Limited Functionality Compared to CLI
    While the GUI is user-friendly, some advanced functionalities available in the iPerf command line version are not accessible in JPerf.
  • Dependency on Java
    As JPerf requires Java to run, users must ensure that Java is installed and correctly configured on their systems.
  • Potential Compatibility Issues
    Due to its lack of updates, JPerf may face compatibility issues with newer versions of operating systems or Java.

Microsoft Operations Management Suite videos

Microsoft Operations Management Suite – IT Management Solution for the cloud era

JPerf videos

[HOWTO] Test My Network Speed?! [iPerf & JPerf]

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Microsoft Operations Management Suite and JPerf)
Monitoring Tools
83 83%
17% 17
IT Management
100 100%
0% 0
Log Management
46 46%
54% 54
Project Management
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Microsoft Operations Management Suite and JPerf. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Microsoft Operations Management Suite and JPerf, you can also consider the following products

NinjaOne - NinjaOne (Formerly NinjaRMM) provides remote monitoring and management software that combines powerful functionality with a fast, modern UI. Easily remediate IT issues, automate common tasks, and support end-users with powerful IT management tools.

iperf - A TCP, UDP, and SCTP network bandwidth measurement tool

Freshservice - Freshservice: the one-stop cloud solution for all your IT management needs.

TamoSoft Throughput Test - TamoSoft Throughput Test is a utility for testing the performance of a wireless or wired network.

ConnectWise Automate - Solve IT Problems with ConnectWise Automate, Remote Monitoring and Remote Management Software. Visit to boost the effectiveness of your IT teams.‎Try ConnectWise Automate .

netperf - Netperf is a benchmark that can be used to measure the performance of many different types of networking. It provides tests for both unidirectional throughput, and end-to-end latency. - HewlettPack...