Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Microsoft Office Access VS Apache Cassandra

Compare Microsoft Office Access VS Apache Cassandra and see what are their differences

Microsoft Office Access logo Microsoft Office Access

Access is now much more than a way to create desktop databases. It’s an easy-to-use tool for quickly creating browser-based database applications.

Apache Cassandra logo Apache Cassandra

The Apache Cassandra database is the right choice when you need scalability and high availability without compromising performance.
  • Microsoft Office Access Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-21
  • Apache Cassandra Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-04-17

Microsoft Office Access features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Microsoft Access provides an intuitive and familiar interface for users, making it accessible for individuals who are already accustomed to other Microsoft Office products.
  • Integration with Other Microsoft Products
    Access seamlessly integrates with other Microsoft Office applications such as Excel, Word, and Outlook, allowing for easy data exchange and enhanced functionality.
  • Rapid Application Development
    With its drag-and-drop functionality and various built-in templates, Access allows for quick creation of data-driven applications without requiring extensive programming knowledge.
  • Cost-Effective Solution
    Compared to larger database management systems (DBMS) like SQL Server or Oracle, Microsoft Access is more affordable, making it a suitable option for small and medium-sized businesses.
  • Easy Reporting and Data Analysis
    Access includes robust tools for creating detailed reports and performing data analysis, which can be very beneficial for business decision-making processes.

Possible disadvantages of Microsoft Office Access

  • Limited Scalability
    Access is not designed to handle very large datasets or a high number of concurrent users, making it less suitable for large enterprises or applications requiring extensive scalability.
  • Limited Multi-User Capability
    While Access does support multi-user functionality, performance can degrade with more than a few simultaneous users, thus limiting its use in team environments.
  • Not Web-Based
    Access applications are desktop-based, meaning they are not inherently designed for web access, which can be a disadvantage in today's cloud-centric business environments.
  • Requires Microsoft Ecosystem
    Access works best within the Microsoft ecosystem, possibly creating compatibility challenges if your organization uses software from other vendors.
  • Limited Advanced Features
    For users needing advanced database features like stored procedures, advanced indexing, or high-level security, Access may not meet their needs compared to more robust DBMS solutions.

Apache Cassandra features and specs

  • Scalability
    Apache Cassandra is designed for linear scalability and can handle large volumes of data across many commodity servers without a single point of failure.
  • High Availability
    Cassandra ensures high availability by replicating data across multiple nodes. Even if some nodes fail, the system remains operational.
  • Performance
    It provides fast writes and reads by using a peer-to-peer architecture, making it highly suitable for applications requiring quick data access.
  • Flexible Data Model
    Cassandra supports a flexible schema, allowing users to add new columns to a table at any time, making it adaptable for various use cases.
  • Geographical Distribution
    Data can be distributed across multiple data centers, ensuring low-latency access for geographically distributed users.
  • No Single Point of Failure
    Its decentralized nature ensures there is no single point of failure, which enhances resilience and fault-tolerance.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Cassandra

  • Complexity
    Managing and configuring Cassandra can be complex, requiring specialized knowledge and skills for optimal performance.
  • Eventual Consistency
    Cassandra follows an eventual consistency model, meaning that there might be a delay before all nodes have the latest data, which may not be suitable for all use cases.
  • Write-heavy Operations
    Although Cassandra handles writes efficiently, write-heavy workloads can lead to compaction issues and increased read latency.
  • Limited Query Capabilities
    Cassandra's query capabilities are relatively limited compared to traditional RDBMS, lacking support for complex joins and aggregations.
  • Maintenance Overhead
    Regular maintenance tasks such as node repair and compaction are necessary to ensure optimal performance, adding to the administrative overhead.
  • Tooling and Ecosystem
    While the ecosystem for Cassandra is growing, it is still not as extensive or mature as those for some other database technologies.

Microsoft Office Access videos

No Microsoft Office Access videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Apache Cassandra videos

Course Intro | DS101: Introduction to Apache Cassandra™

More videos:

  • Review - Introduction to Apache Cassandra™

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Microsoft Office Access and Apache Cassandra)
Databases
33 33%
67% 67
NoSQL Databases
29 29%
71% 71
Spreadsheets
100 100%
0% 0
Relational Databases
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Microsoft Office Access and Apache Cassandra. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Microsoft Office Access and Apache Cassandra

Microsoft Office Access Reviews

We have no reviews of Microsoft Office Access yet.
Be the first one to post

Apache Cassandra Reviews

16 Top Big Data Analytics Tools You Should Know About
Application Areas: If you want to work with SQL-like data types on a No-SQL database, Cassandra is a good choice. It is a popular pick in the IoT, fraud detection applications, recommendation engines, product catalogs and playlists, and messaging applications, providing fast real-time insights.
9 Best MongoDB alternatives in 2019
The Apache Cassandra is an ideal choice for you if you want scalability and high availability without affecting its performance. This MongoDB alternative tool offers support for replicating across multiple datacenters.
Source: www.guru99.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache Cassandra seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 44 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Microsoft Office Access mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Microsoft Office Access yet. Tracking of Microsoft Office Access recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Apache Cassandra mentions (44)

  • Why You Shouldn’t Invest In Vector Databases?
    In fact, even in the absence of these commercial databases, users can effortlessly install PostgreSQL and leverage its built-in pgvector functionality for vector search. PostgreSQL stands as the benchmark in the realm of open-source databases, offering comprehensive support across various domains of database management. It excels in transaction processing (e.g., CockroachDB), online analytics (e.g., DuckDB),... - Source: dev.to / 10 days ago
  • Data integrity in Ably Pub/Sub
    All messages are persisted durably for two minutes, but Pub/Sub channels can be configured to persist messages for longer periods of time using the persisted messages feature. Persisted messages are additionally written to Cassandra. Multiple copies of the message are stored in a quorum of globally-distributed Cassandra nodes. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • Which Database is Perfect for You? A Comprehensive Guide to MySQL, PostgreSQL, NoSQL, and More
    Cassandra is a highly scalable, distributed NoSQL database designed to handle large amounts of data across many commodity servers without a single point of failure. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
  • Consistent Hashing: An Overview and Implementation in Golang
    Distributed storage Distributed storage systems like Cassandra, DynamoDB, and Voldemort also use consistent hashing. In these systems, data is partitioned across many servers. Consistent hashing is used to map data to the servers that store the data. When new servers are added or removed, consistent hashing minimizes the amount of data that needs to be remapped to different servers. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
  • Understanding SQL vs. NoSQL Databases: A Beginner's Guide
    On the other hand, NoSQL databases are non-relational databases. They store data in flexible, JSON-like documents, key-value pairs, or wide-column stores. Examples include MongoDB, Couchbase, and Cassandra. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Microsoft Office Access and Apache Cassandra, you can also consider the following products

LibreOffice - Base - Base, database, database frontend, LibreOffice, ODF, Open Standards, SQL, ODBC

Redis - Redis is an open source in-memory data structure project implementing a distributed, in-memory key-value database with optional durability.

MongoDB - MongoDB (from "humongous") is a scalable, high-performance NoSQL database.

My Visual Database - Using My Visual Database, you can create databases for invoicing, inventory, CRM, or any specific purpose.

ArangoDB - A distributed open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values.

Brilliant Database - Create a personal or business desktop database fast and easily using this simple all-in-one database software. Free 30 day trial.