No Stripe Chargeback Protection videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Based on our record, Microsoft Azure Active Directory should be more popular than Stripe Chargeback Protection. It has been mentiond 15 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Human users using Roles can leverage IAM Identity Center (formerly AWS SSO) which offers a pretty good experience, whether we're federating from Active Directory (a popular choice for enterprises) or managing users within Identity Center (fine for individuals or small team). We get an easy console sign-in experience and similarly frictionless command line access. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
The question is tagged Azure-Active-Directory, which is an IAM/IDP product. That provides plenty of context. Source: 12 months ago
Because the configuration is a highly critical feature, we need to authenticate via an API key or by means of other auth methods. For example, most API Gateway providers such as Apache APISIX enabled token-based access to Admin API and they highly advise generating your own token and regularly changing it. Or Azure API Management relies on Azure Active Directory (Azure AD), which includes optional features such as... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
I will not explain too much about Azure AD. I'll recommend reading the documentation and the home page of the Azure AD. In short, Azure AD (Azure Active Directory) is a cloud-based identity and access management service. You can use the identity provided by Azure AD for connecting various applications or services, including AWS. If you want to learn more about Azure AD, please visit the documentation. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
It is a directory with a lot of functionality. There's actually a number of products under the Azure AD name, including: * Azure AD, their employee/workforce solution. It's a directory, authentication and authorization system. Think Okta or AWS SSO. I imagine this is mostly what the survey was tracking. * Azure AD B2C, their CIAM solution. Think Auth0, Cognito or FusionAuth (disclosure, I'm a FusionAuth employee).... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
Yea, unfortunately Stripe doesn’t make these decisions. Couple things you could consider: * Adding additional verification steps like Stripe Identity * Requiring 3DS, which shifts loss liability in some cases to the card issuer * Using Stripe Checkout with Chargeback Protection: https://stripe.com/radar/chargeback-protection. It costs 0.4%, but you wouldn’t need to worry about losses at all (up to a certain volume... Source: almost 2 years ago
You could consider looking into using Chargeback Protection, which will add to your processing fee, but will protect you from loss from chargebacks on eligible transactions (i.e., purchase made via the Checkout). You won't have to provide evidence, you won't lose the money (up to a certain amount per year); it's essentially an insurance system. And from my reading of their docs, I don't think you'd have to deal... Source: about 2 years ago
I have seen companies out there that specialize in combatting chagebacks for businesses. Basically any chargeback that happens, the company takes care of disputing it. For a company like yourself that processes high dollar transactions/products/services, you may do well to seek such a company and use their service, get your own merchant account and stop using 3rd party processors. Stripe has a chargeback... Source: about 2 years ago
Stripe offers Payment Links [0], which makes it really easy to accept payments (just paste a link into your product page and handle a webhook serverside; a single href is adequate). They also have a separate "Checkout" offering [1], which requires some code client- and server-side to generate the page. So far, Stripe has been awesome for me selling $2.50/mo subscriptions [2], and as far as I know, suspicious... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
Right, Apple is only providing the hardware and it requires to use a (partnered) processor, like Stripe, which was the example they used in their recent announcement. Stripe coincidentally sells chargeback protection as a service https://stripe.com/radar/chargeback-protection if that is a concern. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
Okta - Enterprise-grade identity management for all your apps, users & devices
Stripe: Radar - Fraud prevention done right
Auth0 - Auth0 is a program for people to get authentication and authorization services for their own business use.
DyScan - Stop fraud and process payments faster
OneLogin - On-demand SSO, directory integration, user provisioning and more
Chargeback - Ditch the manual work needed to manage disputes