Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

MicroOLAP TCPDUMP VS Fping (open source)

Compare MicroOLAP TCPDUMP VS Fping (open source) and see what are their differences

MicroOLAP TCPDUMP logo MicroOLAP TCPDUMP

MicroOLAP TCPDUMP is a clone of ...

Fping (open source) logo Fping (open source)

fping is a program to send ICMP echo probes to network hosts, similar to ping, but much better performing when pinging multiple hosts.
  • MicroOLAP TCPDUMP Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-09-05
  • Fping (open source) Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-02-14

MicroOLAP TCPDUMP features and specs

  • Comprehensive Packet Analysis
    MicroOLAP TCPDUMP offers detailed network packet capture and analysis, enabling in-depth inspection of protocols and network traffic for troubleshooting and security assessment.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    The tool is available for multiple operating systems, including Windows, providing flexibility for network administrators who operate in diverse environments.
  • Graphical User Interface
    Unlike the traditional command-line tcpdump, MicroOLAP's version includes a GUI, making it more accessible for users who prefer or require a visual interface for network analysis tasks.

Possible disadvantages of MicroOLAP TCPDUMP

  • Pricing
    MicroOLAP TCPDUMP is a commercial product, which means users might face significant expenses, especially compared to free alternatives like Wireshark or the basic tcpdump.
  • Performance Overhead
    Running a GUI-based packet capture tool can introduce more system overhead compared to command-line tools, potentially affecting performance during extensive captures.
  • Complexity for Beginners
    While the tool is comprehensive, its extensive feature set might be overwhelming for beginners or those with limited networking experience who may find simpler tools more approachable.

Fping (open source) features and specs

  • Speed
    Fping is designed to send out multiple ICMP Echo Requests in parallel, allowing it to quickly scan large numbers of hosts compared to traditional ping commands.
  • Scripting Friendly
    Fping is suitable for use in shell scripts due to its output format, making it useful for automated network monitoring and management tasks.
  • IPv4 and IPv6 Support
    Fping supports both IPv4 and IPv6, providing flexibility for various network environments.
  • Customizable Options
    It offers a wide range of options for setting the number of pings, intervals, and timing, allowing users to tailor the tool to suit specific needs.
  • Resource Efficiency
    Fping consumes fewer system resources compared to some GUI-based network tools, making it ideal for running on servers and low-power devices.

Possible disadvantages of Fping (open source)

  • Command-Line Interface Only
    Fping does not have a graphical user interface, which may make it less accessible to users who are not familiar with command-line operations.
  • Advanced Configuration Complexity
    While it is highly configurable, the range of options and parameters can be overwhelming for new users who may not have a deep understanding of networking.
  • Limited To Echo Requests
    Fping is designed specifically for ICMP Echo Requests, limiting its usefulness for scenarios that require more in-depth network diagnostics.
  • Lack of Built-In Analysis
    Unlike some more comprehensive network monitoring tools, Fping does not include features for detailed analysis and visualization of network data.
  • Potential Security Restrictions
    Some networks may have security policies that restrict the use of ICMP packets, which could limit Fping's effectiveness or even prevent it from functioning.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to MicroOLAP TCPDUMP and Fping (open source))
Monitoring Tools
31 31%
69% 69
Security
26 26%
74% 74
OS & Utilities
0 0%
100% 100
Log Management
44 44%
56% 56

User comments

Share your experience with using MicroOLAP TCPDUMP and Fping (open source). For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing MicroOLAP TCPDUMP and Fping (open source), you can also consider the following products

Winsock Packet Editor - WPE Pro is a packet editor.

Ping Meter Gadget - Customizable, graphical, semi-transparent ping (latency) meter.

Scapy - Scapy is a powerful interactive packet manipulation program.

Open Nettest - Open Nettest is a platform for collecting, processing and visualizing data related QoS and QoE.

Nipper - Nipper - Neat Internet Protocol Packet EditoR - is a graphical packet generation tool.

PingInfoView - PingInfoView is a small utility that allows you to easily ping multiple host names and IP addresses, and watch the result in one table.