Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Micro VS Zuul

Compare Micro VS Zuul and see what are their differences

Piloterr
Piloterr web scraping API handles headless browsers, rotates proxies for you, and offers a library featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Micro logo Micro

Modern terminal-based text editor

Zuul logo Zuul

Zuul is a program that drives continuous integration, delivery, and deployment systems with a focus...
  • Micro Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-12-16
  • Zuul Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-16

Micro features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Micro provides an intuitive interface that is easy to navigate even for beginners, making it accessible for new users.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    Micro is available on multiple operating systems, including Windows, macOS, and Linux, ensuring compatibility across various platforms.
  • Lightweight
    The editor is lightweight and fast, which contributes to a smooth and responsive user experience without consuming significant system resources.
  • Plugin System
    Micro supports plugins, allowing users to extend the editor's functionality to suit their specific needs.
  • Built-in Terminal
    It includes a built-in terminal that enables users to execute commands without leaving the editor environment.
  • Syntax Highlighting
    Micro provides syntax highlighting for many programming languages, enhancing code readability.

Possible disadvantages of Micro

  • Limited Features
    Compared to more established editors like VSCode or Sublime Text, Micro may lack some advanced features and integrations.
  • Less Community Support
    The user community around Micro is smaller compared to that of other text editors, which may result in fewer available resources like plugins, themes, or tutorials.
  • Infrequent Updates
    Updates and new features may be released less frequently, as it is not as widely maintained as more mainstream editors.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Use
    While basic operations are straightforward, some advanced features and customizations may require a learning curve.
  • Limited Built-in Features
    Although plugins can extend its functionality, out of the box, Micro may not have all the built-in features that other editors offer.

Zuul features and specs

  • Integration with Gerrit
    Zuul is tightly integrated with Gerrit, making it an excellent choice for projects that rely on this code review system. This integration allows for effective gated check-ins, ensuring that changes are tested before merging.
  • Parallel Execution
    Zuul supports parallel execution of jobs, which can significantly reduce the time it takes to run test suites and other CI tasks. This feature helps in speeding up the CI/CD pipeline and improving developer productivity.
  • Dependency Management
    Zuul allows for complex dependency management between jobs, which means it can handle multi-repository projects and ensure that changes are thoroughly tested in context with related codebases.
  • Ansible-Based Jobs
    Job definitions in Zuul can leverage Ansible for configuration, making it flexible and powerful for automating complex workflows and existing investments in Ansible.

Possible disadvantages of Zuul

  • Complex Setup
    The setup and configuration of Zuul can be complex, especially for new users or small teams. It may require considerable effort and understanding of its architecture and components.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    Zuul has a steep learning curve for teams not familiar with its concepts or with Gerrit. It may take time for new users to become productive with the system.
  • Limited Non-GoSupervisedGit Integration
    Though Zuul has improved its integration with other version control systems over time, it is still primarily optimized for Gerrit. Projects using different systems might not fully leverage its capabilities.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running a Zuul infrastructure may require significant resources, which could be a concern for small teams or projects with limited budgets.

Analysis of Micro

Overall verdict

  • Micro is a good choice for users who want a lightweight, efficient, and modern text editor within the terminal. It offers enough features for daily text editing tasks while remaining easy to use and configure.

Why this product is good

  • Micro is a terminal-based text editor that offers a balance between simplicity and functionality. It provides intuitive keyboard shortcuts, plugin support, and syntax highlighting, which make it a convenient choice for both beginners and experienced users seeking an easy-to-use and fast text editing experience within the command line. Furthermore, its modern user interface and ability to be extended with Lua plugins make it adaptable to various workflows.

Recommended for

    Micro is recommended for developers, system administrators, and anyone who frequently works within a terminal environment and needs a straightforward yet powerful text editor. It's particularly suitable for those who are looking for a simpler alternative to more complex editors like Vim or Emacs.

Micro videos

+ Add

Microeconomics- Everything You Need to Know

More videos:

  • Review - MICROeconomics 19 Minute Review
  • Review - Game Gear Micro Review

Zuul videos

+ Add

Fortin ZUUL Pedal Review -The New King of Noise Gates

More videos:

  • Demo - WORST DEMO EVER? - Fortin Zuul
  • Demo - Best Noise Gate: Fortin Mini ZUUL - Unboxing, Demo vs. TC Electronic Sentry
  • Tutorial - Zuul Gatway

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Micro and Zuul)

Micro

Zuul

Text Editors
100 100%
Text Editors
0% 0
API Tools
0 0%
API Tools
100% 100
IDE
100 100%
IDE
0% 0
APIs
0 0%
APIs
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Micro and Zuul. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Micro should be more popular than Zuul. It has been mentiond 80 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Micro mentions (80)

  • Trying out Zed after more than a decade of Vim/Neovim
    Check out micro: https://micro-editor.github.io/ It's a terminal editor with mouse support and sane key bindings. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • Notepad++ is 21 years old
    Micro editor (https://micro-editor.github.io/) works best for me but it's terminal-based. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • In your opinion, what is the text-editor equivalent of Openbox?
    Simple yet customizable? My thoughts go to Sublime Text if you want a GUI editor and closed-source is OK, or Micro if you want a TUI editor that is open source: https://micro-editor.github.io/ Like OpenBox, most casual users can be dropped in and know their way around their interfaces, and both options are kinda lightweight compared to other modern options. There is power available for serious customization if you... - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
  • GNU Nano 8 comes with modern key bindings
    This is great! I used to install micro[0] as "nano with better shortcuts", but it was always a bit of an overkill, so I'm really happy with this change. One quirk that remains: even with --modernbindings, Ctrl+X and Ctrl+C will add to nano's clipboard, instead of replacing whatever is there. [0] https://micro-editor.github.io. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Modeless Vim
    Is Micro[0] not a better, more purpose-fit solution to these issues? (Syntax highlighting quality, etc) Prev discussed: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37171294. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
View more

Zuul mentions (13)

  • 6 Lessons From Implementing a Feature on OpenStack Horizon
    In the event that you push code with lint errors, Zuul will highlight them too, making sure that only properly formatted and error free code is merged. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • How do you handle CI/CD for multiple repos that are dependent on each other
    Zuul (https://zuul-ci.org ) is specifically built for this use case. It was originally designed for OpenStack's CI, with OpenStack being broken down in multiple inter-dependent repos. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Beginner trying to set up CI/CD pipeline for small team and deciding between GitLab, Jenkins, etc
    If you’re already using gerrit I would strongly recommend looking at Zuul https://zuul-ci.org. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • F/OSS Spotlight: 🧑‍💻 Zuul
    Zuul (code) helps your team stop merging broken code -- the best kind of gatekeeping. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • [ANN] zuul.el: An interface to Zuul from Emacs
    I wanted to share a package that I have created, and use, to interface the Zuul CI from Emacs. It offers completion for builds or buildsets, and implements a zuul-log-mode to browse the remote logs. Source: almost 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Micro and Zuul, you can also consider the following products

Vis - A vi-like editor based on Plan 9's structural regular expressions.

Istio - Open platform to connect, manage, and secure microservices

Neovim - Vim's rebirth for the 21st century

Ocelot - Application and Data, Build, Test, Deploy, and Microservices Tools

JOE - JOE is a full featured terminal-based screen editor which is distributed under the GNU General...

KrakenD - KrakenD is a pure open source API Gateway that interacts with all your different microservices providing clients a single interface. Improves response times, saves bandwidth, delivers a better user experience and saves developers time.

Loading...