Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Micro VS uFocus

Compare Micro VS uFocus and see what are their differences

Logseq
Logseq is a local-first, non-linear, outliner notebook for organizing and sharing your personal knowledge base. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Micro logo Micro

Modern terminal-based text editor

uFocus logo uFocus

uFocus is the first distraction-free writing application that lets you open all kinds of plain text...
  • Micro Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-12-16
  • uFocus Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-25

Micro videos

+ Add

Microeconomics- Everything You Need to Know

More videos:

  • Review - MICROeconomics 19 Minute Review
  • Review - Game Gear Micro Review

uFocus videos

No uFocus videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Micro and uFocus)

Micro

uFocus

Text Editors
94 94%
Text Editors
6% 6
IDE
100 100%
IDE
0% 0
Markdown Editor
0 0%
Markdown Editor
100% 100
Software Development
100 100%
Software Development
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Micro and uFocus. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Micro seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 77 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Micro mentions (77)

  • GNU Nano 8 comes with modern key bindings
    This is great! I used to install micro[0] as "nano with better shortcuts", but it was always a bit of an overkill, so I'm really happy with this change. One quirk that remains: even with --modernbindings, Ctrl+X and Ctrl+C will add to nano's clipboard, instead of replacing whatever is there. [0] https://micro-editor.github.io. - Source: Hacker News / 17 days ago
  • Modeless Vim
    Is Micro[0] not a better, more purpose-fit solution to these issues? (Syntax highlighting quality, etc) Prev discussed: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37171294. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Essential Command Line Tools for Developers
    To see more screenshots of micro, showcasing some of the default color schemes, see here. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • A simple guide for configuring sudo and doas
    There are two main ways to configure sudo.The first one is using the sudoers file.It is located at /etc/sudoers for Linux,and /usr/local/etc/sudoers for FreeBSD respectively.The paths are different,but the configuration works in the same way. A typical sudoers file looks like this. The sudoers file must be edited with the visudo command,which ensures the config is free of errors.Running this command as the... - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Microsoft is exploring adding a command line text editor into Windows, and it wants your feedback
    I really like micro, a nano-like editor with a very sane, regular people friendly keybinding. Source: 6 months ago
View more

uFocus mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of uFocus yet. Tracking of uFocus recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Micro and uFocus, you can also consider the following products

Vis - A vi-like editor based on Plan 9's structural regular expressions.

WriteRoom - For Mac users to write without distractions. WriteRoom is a full screen writing environment.

Vim - Highly configurable text editor built to enable efficient text editing

iA Writer - Minimal Design, Maximum Focus

fzf - A command-line fuzzy finder written in Go

FocusWriter - FocusWriter is a fullscreen, distraction-free word processor designed to immerse you as much as...

Loading...