Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Micro Focus WebInspect VS Checkmarx

Compare Micro Focus WebInspect VS Checkmarx and see what are their differences

Micro Focus WebInspect logo Micro Focus WebInspect

Learn how Fortify WebInspect dynamic application security testing (DAST) software finds and prioritizes exploitable vulnerabilities in web applications.

Checkmarx logo Checkmarx

The industry’s most comprehensive AppSec platform, Checkmarx One is fast, accurate, and accelerates your business.
  • Micro Focus WebInspect Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-09
  • Checkmarx Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-07-29

Micro Focus WebInspect features and specs

  • Comprehensive Vulnerability Assessment
    Micro Focus WebInspect offers in-depth scanning and analysis, providing a full perspective on various vulnerabilities across web applications.
  • Automation and Efficiency
    It includes features for automating routine testing processes, which increases efficiency and reduces manual effort required for vulnerability detection.
  • Robust Reporting and Analytics
    The tool provides detailed reports and analytics that help in understanding the security posture of web applications and prioritizing remediation efforts.
  • Integration Capabilities
    WebInspect integrates well with other security tools and platforms, allowing for a seamless workflow and enhanced security management.
  • Regular Updates
    Micro Focus provides regular updates to ensure the tool is capable of detecting the latest vulnerabilities and security threats.

Possible disadvantages of Micro Focus WebInspect

  • Complexity
    The tool can be complex to configure and use, especially for organizations or individuals not familiar with advanced security protocols.
  • Cost
    WebInspect can be expensive, making it less accessible for small businesses or those with limited budgets.
  • Resource Intensive
    The tool may require significant system resources, such as memory and processing power, which might impact the performance of the systems it runs on.
  • Learning Curve
    Due to its comprehensive set of features, there is a considerable learning curve involved in fully leveraging the capabilities of WebInspect.
  • False Positives
    Like many automated security testing tools, there is a potential for false positives, which can lead to unnecessary remediation efforts.

Checkmarx features and specs

  • Comprehensive Coverage
    Checkmarx provides extensive support for multiple programming languages and frameworks, allowing for a broad range of applications to be scanned.
  • Integration Capabilities
    The platform integrates well with various DevOps tools and CI/CD pipelines, making it easier to incorporate security checks into the software development lifecycle.
  • Customization
    Offers highly customizable rule sets that can be tailored to specific security requirements and coding standards of the organization.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    Features an intuitive and easy-to-navigate user interface that allows users to efficiently manage and analyze security vulnerabilities.
  • Scalability
    Designed to scale efficiently, Checkmarx can handle large codebases and multiple projects concurrently without significant performance degradation.
  • Strong Reporting Capabilities
    Provides detailed and actionable reports that help developers and security teams quickly understand and address vulnerabilities.
  • Automation
    Supports automated scanning, which helps reduce manual efforts and accelerates the vulnerability detection process.

Possible disadvantages of Checkmarx

  • Cost
    Checkmarx can be expensive, especially for small to medium-sized organizations with limited budgets for security tools.
  • False Positives
    Although comprehensive, the platform sometimes generates false positives, which can lead to unnecessary work and distractions for development teams.
  • Learning Curve
    New users may face a steep learning curve due to the wide range of features and customization options available.
  • Performance Overhead
    In some cases, scanning large and complex codebases can be time-consuming and resource-intensive, potentially impacting development timelines.
  • Customer Support
    Some users have reported that customer support can be slow to respond and may not always provide satisfactory solutions to issues.
  • Initial Setup
    The initial setup process can be complex and time-consuming, requiring considerable effort to properly configure all settings and integrations.

Analysis of Checkmarx

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Checkmarx is generally regarded as a reliable and effective application security testing solution. Its robust features and proactive approach to identifying and mitigating security risks make it a valuable tool for organizations focused on maintaining a secure software development process.

Why this product is good

  • Checkmarx is considered a good choice for application security due to its comprehensive suite of tools designed to identify vulnerabilities early in the software development lifecycle. It offers features like Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Software Composition Analysis (SCA), and Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST). The platform provides a high level of accuracy, integrates well with various development environments, and supports numerous programming languages. Additionally, Checkmarx is known for its ease of use and detailed reporting capabilities, which help developers quickly address security issues.

Recommended for

  • Companies looking for a comprehensive application security platform.
  • Development teams that need seamless integration with CI/CD pipelines.
  • Organizations that require support for multiple programming languages.
  • Security professionals who prioritize early vulnerability detection and detailed reporting.

Micro Focus WebInspect videos

No Micro Focus WebInspect videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Checkmarx videos

Viewing results and understanding security issues via Checkmarx online scanner

More videos:

  • Demo - Checkmarx CxSAST Demonstration
  • Review - Meetups at Checkmarx: An Introduction to API Security
  • Review - Source code review with Checkmarx
  • Review - Checkmarx Results Review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Micro Focus WebInspect and Checkmarx)
Security & Privacy
17 17%
83% 83
Code Analysis
0 0%
100% 100
Web Application Security
12 12%
88% 88
Security
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Micro Focus WebInspect and Checkmarx. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Micro Focus WebInspect and Checkmarx

Micro Focus WebInspect Reviews

We have no reviews of Micro Focus WebInspect yet.
Be the first one to post

Checkmarx Reviews

The Top 11 Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Tools
Why We Picked Checkmarx SAST: We like Checkmarx SAST for its early detection of vulnerabilities, which enables faster and safer code development. Its AI-assisted prioritization of vulnerabilities according to severity and risk helps reduce false positives.
Top 11 SonarQube Alternatives in 2024
Checkmarx is a developer-centric security tool that specializes in secure coding practices and compliance. It helps developers identify and fix security vulnerabilities in their code, ensuring that their applications are secure and compliant with regulatory standards. Checkmarx offers a range of tools and features to help developers build secure applications, including...
Source: www.codeant.ai
The 5 Best SonarQube Alternatives in 2024
While SonarQube offers some security features, Checkmarx provides a more holistic approach to application security, covering a more comprehensive range of security aspects throughout the SDLC. Checkmarx One's consolidation of multiple AppSec tools into a single platform could simplify management and reduce the total cost of ownership compared to using SonarQube alongside...
Source: blog.codacy.com
Ten Best SonarQube alternatives in 2021
CheckMarx has been used to test the programs to rectify vulnerability in the code and try the security lapses. Checkmarx is the software program exposure Platform for the enterprise. It has an impressive Codebashing characteristic that has the threshold over SonarQube. The software tracking-reporting function is good too. The "delta-experiment" function is it's far genuinely...
Source: duecode.io

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Checkmarx seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Micro Focus WebInspect mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Micro Focus WebInspect yet. Tracking of Micro Focus WebInspect recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Checkmarx mentions (3)

  • Penetration Testing for API Security: Protecting Digital Gateways
    Tools like SonarQube, Checkmarx, or Snyk can automate parts of this process by scanning for known vulnerability patterns. While white box testing may not reflect real-world attack scenarios (as attackers rarely access source code), it provides the most thorough assessment of security posture. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • A Guide to DevSecOps with API Gateway
    Automate security testing: Use tools such as OWASP ZAP, SonarQube, or Checkmarx to automate security testing. This will help you identify security issues early in the development process and reduce the risk of vulnerabilities being introduced into your code. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
  • 11 Top DevSecOps Tools
    Application Security (AppSec) is the forte of Checkmarx, which is an award-winning AppSec Testing tool that integrates security policies into the DevOps workflow and ensures security across the application lifecycle. Checkmarx scans all your code and provides actionable insights for critical vulnerabilities. Checkmarx also offers developer-friendly AppSec training that makes the transition to DevSecOps more... - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Micro Focus WebInspect and Checkmarx, you can also consider the following products

Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner - Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner is a platform that offers a web vulnerability scanner and provides security testing to users for their web applications.

SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.

Netsparker - Netsparker is a tool for scanning web sites for security vulnerabilities.

Coverity Scan - Find and fix defects in your Java, C/C++ or C# open source project for free

InsightAppSec - Rapid7's application security product offering cloud-powered application security analysis.

Veracode - Veracode's application security software products are simpler and more scalable to increase the resiliency of your application infrastructure.