Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Micro Focus Fortify On Demand VS Synopsys DAST

Compare Micro Focus Fortify On Demand VS Synopsys DAST and see what are their differences

Micro Focus Fortify On Demand logo Micro Focus Fortify On Demand

Complete application security as a service (AppSec SaaS) solution with SAST, DAST, IAST, RASP, SCA (open source security), and developer security training.

Synopsys DAST logo Synopsys DAST

Dynamic application security testing (DAST) helps you find vulnerabilities in web applications before they are exploited by malicious actors.
  • Micro Focus Fortify On Demand Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-17
  • Synopsys DAST Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-20

Micro Focus Fortify On Demand features and specs

  • Comprehensive Security Testing
    Fortify On Demand provides a wide range of security testing features, including static, dynamic, and mobile application security testing, which helps identify vulnerabilities at different stages of the software development lifecycle.
  • Scalability
    The platform is designed to scale with the needs of the organization, making it suitable for businesses of various sizes, from small startups to large enterprises.
  • Ease of Use
    The user-friendly interface of Fortify On Demand allows both developers and security teams to easily manage and understand security assessments, even without deep security expertise.
  • Integration Capabilities
    Fortify On Demand can be integrated with popular CI/CD tools and development environments, facilitating seamless security integration into the DevOps pipeline.
  • Regular Updates
    The tool is regularly updated with the latest security rules and features, ensuring users are protected against emerging threats.

Possible disadvantages of Micro Focus Fortify On Demand

  • Cost
    The pricing of Fortify On Demand can be prohibitive for small businesses or projects with limited budgets, especially when scaling up for larger teams and applications.
  • Initial Setup Complexity
    Setting up Fortify On Demand can be complex and time-consuming, requiring significant resource investment in training and configuration.
  • False Positives
    Like many automated security testing tools, Fortify On Demand might produce false positives, necessitating additional manual review for some results.
  • Performance Impact
    In some cases, running comprehensive security tests can impact system performance, which might slow down development and deployment activities.
  • Learning Curve
    While the interface is user-friendly, there is a learning curve associated with effectively utilizing all the advanced features and understanding the full potential of the tool.

Synopsys DAST features and specs

  • Comprehensive Coverage
    Synopsys DAST offers extensive testing for various web application vulnerabilities, providing thorough security assessments.
  • Automation
    The tool supports automation, allowing for continuous scanning that fits well into DevOps and CI/CD pipelines.
  • Managed Services
    With the managed services offering, organizations can leverage expert support to optimize their security testing and address any findings.
  • Integration
    Synopsys DAST integrates with other tools and platforms, enhancing its usability and allowing for seamless workflows across various environments.

Possible disadvantages of Synopsys DAST

  • False Positives
    Like many automated tools, Synopsys DAST may produce false positives, requiring manual verification to confirm the validity of some findings.
  • Complex Setup
    The initial setup and configuration of Synopsys DAST can be complex, potentially requiring dedicated resources or expertise.
  • Performance Impact
    Dynamic testing can potentially impact application performance during scans, which might require planning to minimize disruptions.
  • Cost
    The pricing for Synopsys DAST can be a concern for smaller organizations or those with limited budgets, especially if additional managed services are required.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Micro Focus Fortify On Demand and Synopsys DAST)
Code Analysis
100 100%
0% 0
Security & Privacy
70 70%
30% 30
Code Review
92 92%
8% 8
Web Application Security
77 77%
23% 23

User comments

Share your experience with using Micro Focus Fortify On Demand and Synopsys DAST. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Micro Focus Fortify On Demand and Synopsys DAST, you can also consider the following products

Checkmarx - The industry’s most comprehensive AppSec platform, Checkmarx One is fast, accurate, and accelerates your business.

Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner - Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner is a platform that offers a web vulnerability scanner and provides security testing to users for their web applications.

Veracode - Veracode's application security software products are simpler and more scalable to increase the resiliency of your application infrastructure.

Netsparker - Netsparker is a tool for scanning web sites for security vulnerabilities.

SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.

Coverity Scan - Find and fix defects in your Java, C/C++ or C# open source project for free