Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

memcached VS MongoDB Atlas

Compare memcached VS MongoDB Atlas and see what are their differences

memcached logo memcached

High-performance, distributed memory object caching system

MongoDB Atlas logo MongoDB Atlas

The best way to host MongoDB in the cloud. Deploy on AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud Platform. Try it free!
  • memcached Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-23
  • MongoDB Atlas Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-28

memcached features and specs

  • High Performance
    Memcached is incredibly fast and efficient at caching data in memory, enabling quick data retrieval and reducing the load on databases. Its in-memory nature significantly reduces latency.
  • Scalability
    Memcached can be easily scaled horizontally by adding more nodes to the caching cluster. This allows it to handle increased loads and large datasets without performance degradation.
  • Simplicity
    Memcached has a simple design and API, making it easy to implement and use. Developers can quickly integrate it into their applications without a steep learning curve.
  • Open Source
    Memcached is free and open-source software, which means it can be used and modified without any licensing fees. This makes it a cost-effective solution for caching.
  • Language Agnostic
    Memcached supports multiple programming languages through various client libraries, making it versatile and suitable for use in diverse tech stacks.

Possible disadvantages of memcached

  • Data Volatility
    Memcached stores data in RAM, so all cached data is lost if the server is restarted or crashes. This makes it unsuitable for storing critical or persistent data.
  • Limited Data Types
    Memcached primarily supports simple key-value pairs. It lacks the rich data types and more complex structures supported by some other caching solutions like Redis.
  • No Persistence
    Memcached does not offer any data persistence features. It cannot save data to disk, so all information is ephemeral and will be lost on system reset.
  • Size Limitation
    Memcached has a memory limit for each instance, thus, large-scale applications may need to manage multiple instances and ensure data is properly distributed.
  • Security
    Memcached does not provide built-in security features such as authentication or encryption. This can be a concern in environments where data privacy and security are critical.

MongoDB Atlas features and specs

  • Scalability
    MongoDB Atlas offers excellent scalability, allowing users to easily scale their databases vertically and horizontally to accommodate growing data needs and increasing traffic.
  • Fully Managed Service
    MongoDB Atlas is a fully managed service, meaning that tasks such as database patching, hardware provisioning, and backups are handled automatically, reducing the administrative burden on users.
  • Global Distribution
    MongoDB Atlas provides global data distribution, enabling users to deploy their databases across multiple regions and ensure low-latency access to data for end-users.
  • Security Features
    With MongoDB Atlas, robust security features such as encryption at rest and in transit, robust authentication, and fine-grained access control are available to protect your data.
  • Integration and Ecosystem
    MongoDB Atlas integrates well with other AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud services, as well as a wide variety of development tools and third-party services.
  • Auto-scaling
    Atlas provides auto-scaling capabilities that automatically adjusts the database resources according to workload demands, optimizing performance and cost efficiency.

Possible disadvantages of MongoDB Atlas

  • Cost
    MongoDB Atlas can become expensive as data and workloads grow, especially when additional features such as backups, sharding, and global deployments are utilized.
  • Dependency on Internet Access
    Since MongoDB Atlas is a cloud-based service, a reliable internet connection is necessary for consistent database access, which could be a drawback in environments with poor connectivity.
  • Complexity of Advanced Features
    While MongoDB Atlas provides many advanced features, effectively utilizing them may require a learning curve, potentially complicating deployment and management for less experienced users.
  • Vendor Lock-in
    Utilizing MongoDB Atlas can lead to vendor lock-in, making it difficult to switch to other database solutions without significant effort and cost.
  • Limited Control
    Being a managed service, users may have limited control over underlying infrastructure and certain configurations, which might be an issue for those who need specific custom setups.

memcached videos

Course Preview: Using Memcached and Varnish to Speed Up Your Linux Web App

MongoDB Atlas videos

An explanation of MongoDB Atlas' features and functionalities

More videos:

  • Review - MongoDB Atlas on Google Cloud
  • Review - Ep. 6 Five Ways to Reduce Costs with MongoDB Atlas

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to memcached and MongoDB Atlas)
Databases
70 70%
30% 30
NoSQL Databases
77 77%
23% 23
Key-Value Database
100 100%
0% 0
Relational Databases
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using memcached and MongoDB Atlas. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare memcached and MongoDB Atlas

memcached Reviews

Redis vs. KeyDB vs. Dragonfly vs. Skytable | Hacker News
Quick ask: I don’t see “some” of the other offering out there like MemCached… what was the criteria used to select these? I don’t see any source of how the test where run, specs of the systems, how the DB where set up, etc. Would be very valuable to have in order to attempt to re-validate these test on our own platform. I also came back and saw some of your updates...
Memcached vs Redis - More Different Than You Would Expect
So knowing how the difference between Redis and memcached in-memory usage, lets see what this means. Memcached slabs once assigned never change their size. This means it is possible to poison your memcached cluster and really waste memory. If you load your empty memcached cluster with lots of 1 MB items, then all of the slabs will be allocated to that size. Adding a 80 KB...
Redis vs. Memcached: In-Memory Data Storage Systems
Memcached itself does not support distributed mode. You can only achieve the distributed storage of Memcached on the client side through distributed algorithms such as Consistent Hash. The figure below demonstrates the distributed storage implementation schema of Memcached. Before the client side sends data to the Memcached cluster, it first calculates the target node of the...
Source: medium.com
Why Redis beats Memcached for caching
Both Memcached and Redis are mature and hugely popular open source projects. Memcached was originally developed by Brad Fitzpatrick in 2003 for the LiveJournal website. Since then, Memcached has been rewritten in C (the original implementation was in Perl) and put in the public domain, where it has become a cornerstone of modern Web applications. Current development of...

MongoDB Atlas Reviews

We have no reviews of MongoDB Atlas yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, memcached seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 36 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

memcached mentions (36)

  • MySQL Performance Tuning Techniques
    Memcached can help when lightning-fast performance is needed. These tools store frequently accessed data, such as session details, API responses, or product prices, in RAM. This reduces the laid on your primary database, so you can deliver microsecond response times. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • 10 Best Practices for API Rate Limiting in 2025
    In-memory tools like Redis or Memcached for fast Data retrieval. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Outgrowing Postgres: Handling increased user concurrency
    A caching layer using popular in-memory databases like Redis or Memcached can go a long way in addressing Postgres connection overload issues by being able to handle a much larger concurrent request load. Adding a cache lets you serve frequent reads from memory instead, taking pressure off Postgres. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • API Caching: Techniques for Better Performance
    Memcached — Free and well-known for its simplicity, Memcached is a distributed and powerful memory object caching system. It uses key-value pairs to store small data chunks from database calls, API calls, and page rendering. It is available on Windows. Strings are the only supported data type. Its client-server architecture distributes the cache logic, with half of the logic implemented on the server and the other... - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • story of upgrading rails 5.x to 7.x
    The app depends on several packages to run, so I need to install them locally too. I used a combination of brew and orbstack / docker for installing packages. Some dependencies for this project are redis, mongodb and memcache. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
View more

MongoDB Atlas mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of MongoDB Atlas yet. Tracking of MongoDB Atlas recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing memcached and MongoDB Atlas, you can also consider the following products

Redis - Redis is an open source in-memory data structure project implementing a distributed, in-memory key-value database with optional durability.

SAP HANA - SAP HANA is an in-memory, column-oriented, relational database management system.

MongoDB - MongoDB (from "humongous") is a scalable, high-performance NoSQL database.

Ninox - Ninox is a human-friendly database. Create your own Business Application with Ninox that matches your workflow. Ninox lets you integrate CRM, ERP, HR and many more...

Aerospike - Aerospike is a high-performing NoSQL database supporting high transaction volumes with low latency.

Amazon Aurora - MySQL and PostgreSQL-compatible relational database built for the cloud. Performance and availability of commercial-grade databases at 1/10th the cost.