Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

memcached VS BoltDB

Compare memcached VS BoltDB and see what are their differences

memcached logo memcached

High-performance, distributed memory object caching system

BoltDB logo BoltDB

An embedded key/value database for Go. Contribute to boltdb/bolt development by creating an account on GitHub.
  • memcached Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-23
  • BoltDB Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-07

memcached features and specs

  • High Performance
    Memcached is incredibly fast and efficient at caching data in memory, enabling quick data retrieval and reducing the load on databases. Its in-memory nature significantly reduces latency.
  • Scalability
    Memcached can be easily scaled horizontally by adding more nodes to the caching cluster. This allows it to handle increased loads and large datasets without performance degradation.
  • Simplicity
    Memcached has a simple design and API, making it easy to implement and use. Developers can quickly integrate it into their applications without a steep learning curve.
  • Open Source
    Memcached is free and open-source software, which means it can be used and modified without any licensing fees. This makes it a cost-effective solution for caching.
  • Language Agnostic
    Memcached supports multiple programming languages through various client libraries, making it versatile and suitable for use in diverse tech stacks.

Possible disadvantages of memcached

  • Data Volatility
    Memcached stores data in RAM, so all cached data is lost if the server is restarted or crashes. This makes it unsuitable for storing critical or persistent data.
  • Limited Data Types
    Memcached primarily supports simple key-value pairs. It lacks the rich data types and more complex structures supported by some other caching solutions like Redis.
  • No Persistence
    Memcached does not offer any data persistence features. It cannot save data to disk, so all information is ephemeral and will be lost on system reset.
  • Size Limitation
    Memcached has a memory limit for each instance, thus, large-scale applications may need to manage multiple instances and ensure data is properly distributed.
  • Security
    Memcached does not provide built-in security features such as authentication or encryption. This can be a concern in environments where data privacy and security are critical.

BoltDB features and specs

  • Simplicity
    BoltDB is easy to use with a simple API, making it accessible for developers to integrate into applications without a steep learning curve.
  • Performance
    Designed for high read performance, BoltDB offers efficient access to data that makes it suitable for applications with heavy read workloads.
  • ACID Transactions
    BoltDB supports ACID transactions, ensuring data integrity and reliability across operations, which is essential for applications that require consistent state.
  • Embedded
    As an embedded key/value store, BoltDB operates within the application's memory space, reducing the overhead associated with server-based databases.
  • Go-centric
    Written in pure Go, BoltDB is optimized for applications written in Go, providing seamless integration and compatibility for Go developers.

Possible disadvantages of BoltDB

  • Write Concurrency
    BoltDB uses a single writer with multiple readers, which can become a bottleneck in write-heavy applications as concurrent writes are not supported.
  • Scalability
    Designed as an embedded database, BoltDB is not ideal for applications requiring distributed or highly scalable database solutions.
  • Deprecation
    BoltDB is no longer actively maintained in its original repository, which may deter developers from adopting it due to potential risks with unsupported software.
  • Large Dataset Handling
    BoltDB might experience performance degradation with very large datasets, as it was primarily designed for smaller, single-node applications.
  • Limited Features
    Compared to more advanced databases, BoltDB lacks features like advanced querying capabilities, caching mechanisms, and complex data types that might be needed in complex applications.

Analysis of memcached

Overall verdict

  • Memcached is a solid choice for applications that require distributed caching to improve scalability and performance. It's particularly beneficial for web applications handling high traffic and needing fast, efficient data retrieval.

Why this product is good

  • Memcached is considered good due to its high performance, simplicity, and effectiveness in enhancing the speed of dynamic web applications by alleviating database load. It operates by storing data in memory, which allows for quick retrieval of cached objects and reduces the need to frequently query the database. Its distributed architecture, open-source nature, and widespread language support make it a flexible and reliable choice for caching.

Recommended for

  • Web developers looking to improve the speed and scalability of applications.
  • Organizations needing a simple and effective caching solution to reduce database load.
  • Projects that demand quick deployment of a caching solution with support across multiple programming languages.

memcached videos

Course Preview: Using Memcached and Varnish to Speed Up Your Linux Web App

BoltDB videos

No BoltDB videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to memcached and BoltDB)
Databases
81 81%
19% 19
NoSQL Databases
82 82%
18% 18
Key-Value Database
92 92%
8% 8
Graph Databases
63 63%
37% 37

User comments

Share your experience with using memcached and BoltDB. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare memcached and BoltDB

memcached Reviews

Redis vs. KeyDB vs. Dragonfly vs. Skytable | Hacker News
Quick ask: I don’t see “some” of the other offering out there like MemCached… what was the criteria used to select these? I don’t see any source of how the test where run, specs of the systems, how the DB where set up, etc. Would be very valuable to have in order to attempt to re-validate these test on our own platform. I also came back and saw some of your updates...
Memcached vs Redis - More Different Than You Would Expect
So knowing how the difference between Redis and memcached in-memory usage, lets see what this means. Memcached slabs once assigned never change their size. This means it is possible to poison your memcached cluster and really waste memory. If you load your empty memcached cluster with lots of 1 MB items, then all of the slabs will be allocated to that size. Adding a 80 KB...
Redis vs. Memcached: In-Memory Data Storage Systems
Memcached itself does not support distributed mode. You can only achieve the distributed storage of Memcached on the client side through distributed algorithms such as Consistent Hash. The figure below demonstrates the distributed storage implementation schema of Memcached. Before the client side sends data to the Memcached cluster, it first calculates the target node of the...
Source: medium.com
Why Redis beats Memcached for caching
Both Memcached and Redis are mature and hugely popular open source projects. Memcached was originally developed by Brad Fitzpatrick in 2003 for the LiveJournal website. Since then, Memcached has been rewritten in C (the original implementation was in Perl) and put in the public domain, where it has become a cornerstone of modern Web applications. Current development of...

BoltDB Reviews

We have no reviews of BoltDB yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, memcached should be more popular than BoltDB. It has been mentiond 36 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

memcached mentions (36)

  • MySQL Performance Tuning Techniques
    Memcached can help when lightning-fast performance is needed. These tools store frequently accessed data, such as session details, API responses, or product prices, in RAM. This reduces the laid on your primary database, so you can deliver microsecond response times. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • 10 Best Practices for API Rate Limiting in 2025
    In-memory tools like Redis or Memcached for fast Data retrieval. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Outgrowing Postgres: Handling increased user concurrency
    A caching layer using popular in-memory databases like Redis or Memcached can go a long way in addressing Postgres connection overload issues by being able to handle a much larger concurrent request load. Adding a cache lets you serve frequent reads from memory instead, taking pressure off Postgres. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • API Caching: Techniques for Better Performance
    Memcached — Free and well-known for its simplicity, Memcached is a distributed and powerful memory object caching system. It uses key-value pairs to store small data chunks from database calls, API calls, and page rendering. It is available on Windows. Strings are the only supported data type. Its client-server architecture distributes the cache logic, with half of the logic implemented on the server and the other... - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • story of upgrading rails 5.x to 7.x
    The app depends on several packages to run, so I need to install them locally too. I used a combination of brew and orbstack / docker for installing packages. Some dependencies for this project are redis, mongodb and memcache. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
View more

BoltDB mentions (14)

  • Bleve: How to build a rocket-fast search engine?
    Bleve supports a few different index types, but I found after much fiddling that the "scorch" index type gives you the best performance. If you don't pass in the last 3 arguments, Bleve will just default to BoltDB. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Announcing jammdb: a simple single-file key/value store
    This crate started out as just a way for me to learn how boltdb works, while learning Rust at the same time. But somehow people started finding and using it and seem to like the simple API, so I figured I might as well share it in case someone else finds it useful too. If you want to know more about my motivations and the history of this crate, you can read the release notes on version 0.8.0! Source: over 2 years ago
  • Polygon: Json Database System designed to run on small servers (as low as 16MB) and still be fast and flexible.
    Some example of embeddable database could be genji, badger and boltdb. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Ask HN: Books on designing disk-optimized data structures?
    Designing Data Intensive applications- specifically chapter 3 and 4 which deal with strategies and algorithms for storing and encoding data to be stored on disk and their pros and cons. Once you read that, I'll suggest reading the source of a simple embedded key-value database, I wouldn't bother with RDBMs as they are complex beasts and contain way more than you need. BoltDB is a good project to read the source of... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • GitHub examples of Go that's written really well?
    Bolt db and Bolt db's author post to go with it. Source: almost 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing memcached and BoltDB, you can also consider the following products

Redis - Redis is an open source in-memory data structure project implementing a distributed, in-memory key-value database with optional durability.

MongoDB - MongoDB (from "humongous") is a scalable, high-performance NoSQL database.

Aerospike - Aerospike is a high-performing NoSQL database supporting high transaction volumes with low latency.

ArangoDB - A distributed open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values.

CouchBase - Document-Oriented NoSQL Database

Apache Cassandra - The Apache Cassandra database is the right choice when you need scalability and high availability without compromising performance.