Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

memcached VS Apache Kudu

Compare memcached VS Apache Kudu and see what are their differences

Draxlr
Turn SQL Data into Decisions. Build professional dashboards and data visualizations without technical expertise. Easily embed analytics anywhere, receive automated alerts, and discover AI-powered insights all through a straightforward interface. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

memcached logo memcached

High-performance, distributed memory object caching system

Apache Kudu logo Apache Kudu

Apache Kudu is Hadoop's storage layer to enable fast analytics on fast data.
  • memcached Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-23
  • Apache Kudu Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-26

memcached features and specs

  • High Performance
    Memcached is incredibly fast and efficient at caching data in memory, enabling quick data retrieval and reducing the load on databases. Its in-memory nature significantly reduces latency.
  • Scalability
    Memcached can be easily scaled horizontally by adding more nodes to the caching cluster. This allows it to handle increased loads and large datasets without performance degradation.
  • Simplicity
    Memcached has a simple design and API, making it easy to implement and use. Developers can quickly integrate it into their applications without a steep learning curve.
  • Open Source
    Memcached is free and open-source software, which means it can be used and modified without any licensing fees. This makes it a cost-effective solution for caching.
  • Language Agnostic
    Memcached supports multiple programming languages through various client libraries, making it versatile and suitable for use in diverse tech stacks.

Possible disadvantages of memcached

  • Data Volatility
    Memcached stores data in RAM, so all cached data is lost if the server is restarted or crashes. This makes it unsuitable for storing critical or persistent data.
  • Limited Data Types
    Memcached primarily supports simple key-value pairs. It lacks the rich data types and more complex structures supported by some other caching solutions like Redis.
  • No Persistence
    Memcached does not offer any data persistence features. It cannot save data to disk, so all information is ephemeral and will be lost on system reset.
  • Size Limitation
    Memcached has a memory limit for each instance, thus, large-scale applications may need to manage multiple instances and ensure data is properly distributed.
  • Security
    Memcached does not provide built-in security features such as authentication or encryption. This can be a concern in environments where data privacy and security are critical.

Apache Kudu features and specs

  • Fast Analytics on Fresh Data
    Kudu is designed for fast analytical processing on up-to-date data. It allows for efficient columnar storage which enables quick read and write capabilities suitable for real-time analytics.
  • Hybrid Workloads
    Supports hybrid workloads of both analytical and transactional processing, making it versatile for use cases that require both types of operations.
  • Seamless Integration
    Integrates well with the Apache ecosystem, particularly with Apache Hadoop, Apache Impala, and Apache Spark, enabling a cohesive environment for data processing and management.
  • Fine-grained Updates
    Allows for efficient updates to individual columns and rows, which is useful for applications that require frequent updates alongside analytic capabilities.
  • Schema Evolution
    Supports schema evolution, which allows for adding, dropping, and renaming columns without costly table rewrites.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Kudu

  • Complexity in Installation and Configuration
    The setup and configuration of Kudu can be complex, requiring a good understanding of its architecture and dependencies.
  • Limited SQL Support
    While Kudu is optimized for analytical tasks, its SQL capabilities are limited compared to some traditional RDBMS systems, which might require additional tools for more complex queries.
  • Community and Ecosystem
    Although growing, the community and ecosystem around Kudu are smaller compared to more established systems, which may result in less available resources and third-party tools.
  • Memory Intensive
    Kudu can be memory-intensive, which might require more hardware resources compared to other systems, especially as data volumes grow.
  • Write Performance Limitations
    While Kudu offers fast reads, its write performance can be slower compared to systems specifically optimized for high-speed transactional processing.

memcached videos

+ Add

Course Preview: Using Memcached and Varnish to Speed Up Your Linux Web App

Apache Kudu videos

+ Add

Apache Kudu and Spark SQL for Fast Analytics on Fast Data (Mike Percy)

More videos:

  • Review - Apache Kudu (Incubating): New Hadoop Storage for Fast Analytics on Fast Data
  • Review - Apache Kudu: Fast Analytics on Fast Data | DataEngConf SF '16

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to memcached and Apache Kudu)

memcached

Apache Kudu

Databases
100 100%
Databases
0% 0
Office & Productivity
0 0%
Office & Productivity
100% 100
NoSQL Databases
100 100%
NoSQL Databases
0% 0
Technical Computing
0 0%
Technical Computing
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using memcached and Apache Kudu. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare memcached and Apache Kudu

memcached Reviews

Redis vs. KeyDB vs. Dragonfly vs. Skytable | Hacker News
Quick ask: I don’t see “some” of the other offering out there like MemCached… what was the criteria used to select these? I don’t see any source of how the test where run, specs of the systems, how the DB where set up, etc. Would be very valuable to have in order to attempt to re-validate these test on our own platform. I also came back and saw some of your updates...
Source: news.ycombinator.com
Memcached vs Redis - More Different Than You Would Expect
So knowing how the difference between Redis and memcached in-memory usage, lets see what this means. Memcached slabs once assigned never change their size. This means it is possible to poison your memcached cluster and really waste memory. If you load your empty memcached cluster with lots of 1 MB items, then all of the slabs will be allocated to that size. Adding a 80 KB...
Source: engineering.kablamo.com.au
Redis vs. Memcached: In-Memory Data Storage Systems
Memcached itself does not support distributed mode. You can only achieve the distributed storage of Memcached on the client side through distributed algorithms such as Consistent Hash. The figure below demonstrates the distributed storage implementation schema of Memcached. Before the client side sends data to the Memcached cluster, it first calculates the target node of the...
Source: medium.com
Why Redis beats Memcached for caching
Both Memcached and Redis are mature and hugely popular open source projects. Memcached was originally developed by Brad Fitzpatrick in 2003 for the LiveJournal website. Since then, Memcached has been rewritten in C (the original implementation was in Perl) and put in the public domain, where it has become a cornerstone of modern Web applications. Current development of...
Source: www.infoworld.com

Apache Kudu Reviews

We have no reviews of Apache Kudu yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, memcached seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 36 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

memcached mentions (36)

  • MySQL Performance Tuning Techniques
    Memcached can help when lightning-fast performance is needed. These tools store frequently accessed data, such as session details, API responses, or product prices, in RAM. This reduces the laid on your primary database, so you can deliver microsecond response times. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • 10 Best Practices for API Rate Limiting in 2025
    In-memory tools like Redis or Memcached for fast Data retrieval. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Outgrowing Postgres: Handling increased user concurrency
    A caching layer using popular in-memory databases like Redis or Memcached can go a long way in addressing Postgres connection overload issues by being able to handle a much larger concurrent request load. Adding a cache lets you serve frequent reads from memory instead, taking pressure off Postgres. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • API Caching: Techniques for Better Performance
    Memcached — Free and well-known for its simplicity, Memcached is a distributed and powerful memory object caching system. It uses key-value pairs to store small data chunks from database calls, API calls, and page rendering. It is available on Windows. Strings are the only supported data type. Its client-server architecture distributes the cache logic, with half of the logic implemented on the server and the other... - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • story of upgrading rails 5.x to 7.x
    The app depends on several packages to run, so I need to install them locally too. I used a combination of brew and orbstack / docker for installing packages. Some dependencies for this project are redis, mongodb and memcache. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
View more

Apache Kudu mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Apache Kudu yet. Tracking of Apache Kudu recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing memcached and Apache Kudu, you can also consider the following products

Redis - Redis is an open source in-memory data structure project implementing a distributed, in-memory key-value database with optional durability.

Azure Databricks - Azure Databricks is a fast, easy, and collaborative Apache Spark-based big data analytics service designed for data science and data engineering.

MongoDB - MongoDB (from "humongous") is a scalable, high-performance NoSQL database.

MyAnalytics - MyAnalytics, now rebranded to Microsoft Viva Insights, is a customizable suite of tools that integrates with Office 365 to drive employee engagement and increase productivity.

Aerospike - Aerospike is a high-performing NoSQL database supporting high transaction volumes with low latency.

IBM Cloud Pak for Data - Move to cloud faster with IBM Cloud Paks running on Red Hat OpenShift – fully integrated, open, containerized and secure solutions certified by IBM.

Loading...