Software Alternatives & Reviews

mCast VS Sitecake

Compare mCast VS Sitecake and see what are their differences

mCast logo mCast

Podcast player for the macOS menubar

Sitecake logo Sitecake

Drag and drop CMS for HTML websites. It's flat file CMS so it's pretty fast.
  • mCast Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-30
  • Sitecake Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-09-11

mCast videos

MCAST WITH MONEZ_

More videos:

  • Review - MCAST Freshers' Week 2017

Sitecake videos

Editing a Website with Sitecake CMS

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to mCast and Sitecake)
Podcast Tools
100 100%
0% 0
CMS
0 0%
100% 100
Podcast Hosting
100 100%
0% 0
Blogging Platform
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using mCast and Sitecake. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Sitecake seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 5 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

mCast mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of mCast yet. Tracking of mCast recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Sitecake mentions (5)

  • Maintaining this site fucking sucks
    Use something like this? CMS that generates static html? https://sitecake.com/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Publii: Open-source local WYSIWYG static site CMS
    I think that user experience of website builders with wysiwyg and drag and drop UX won over time. Then, as time passed by, website builders become bloated and complex. Once again you needed a professional to maintain your site in site builder. So now simple solutions, static HTML, free or one-time fee CMSs are sexy again. (economy is not good, who wants another subscription?) I know because 14 years ago we have... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • Best solution that would give clients the ability to edit content on their extremely minimal/simple site?
    Https://sitecake.com/ works with simple html and PHP sites.... Veeeerrrry simple for client edits. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Conventional approach to allowing business owner to edit static site?
    May be a suitable use case for https://sitecake.com/. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Do you know any No-Code CMS or Data-Base for self-hosted Webflow Sites?
    Other than that: Inline Editing CMS examples: Coast CMS, all you need to do is make the html editable with some classes and you're done. The CMS is kind of outdated though. Other examples: simplyedit.io, surrealcms.com, jocms.net, inlinecms.com, sitecake.com. Source: about 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing mCast and Sitecake, you can also consider the following products

Overcast - Video-first asset management for teams

ClassicPress - The WordPress fork. No Gutenberg. Great future!

Smart Podcast Player - The best podcast player for serious podcasters

TYPO3 - TYPO3.com - Infos, SLAs, Extended Support Versions and more

New Google Podcasts - Google Podcasts is launching a redesign on iOS and Android

Flextype - Flat-file content management system in PHP