Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Matrix.org VS Open Collective

Compare Matrix.org VS Open Collective and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Matrix.org logo Matrix.org

Matrix is an open standard for decentralized persistent communication over IP.

Open Collective logo Open Collective

Recurring funding for groups.
  • Matrix.org Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-21
  • Open Collective Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-25

Matrix.org features and specs

  • Decentralization
    Matrix.org is built on a decentralized architecture, meaning no single entity controls the entire network. This ensures greater resilience, scalability, and prevents single points of failure.
  • Interoperability
    The platform is designed to bridge communications with other networks, such as Slack, IRC, and others, facilitating seamless interaction across different services.
  • End-to-End Encryption
    Matrix.org supports end-to-end encryption, ensuring that conversations are secure and private, and only accessible to the intended recipients.
  • Open-Source
    Matrix.org is an open-source project, allowing anyone to inspect, modify, and contribute to the code base, which promotes transparency and continuous improvement.
  • Rich Communication
    The platform supports a variety of communication forms, including text, voice, video, and file sharing, making it versatile for different use cases.

Possible disadvantages of Matrix.org

  • Complex Setup
    Setting up a Matrix server can be complex and resource-intensive, requiring technical expertise which may not be accessible to all users.
  • Latency
    Due to its decentralized nature, users might experience higher latency compared to centralized messaging platforms, particularly in global communications.
  • Limited Network
    While Matrix is growing, its network is still smaller compared to mainstream alternatives, which might affect user adoption and community size.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running a Matrix server can be resource-intensive in terms of memory and CPU usage, which might demand higher infrastructure costs.
  • Learning Curve
    Users and administrators might face a steep learning curve due to the complexity of Matrix's features and configurations.

Open Collective features and specs

  • Transparency
    Open Collective offers transparent accounting and financial reporting, allowing everyone to see how funds are being used.
  • Community Engagement
    It allows communities to come together and support projects they care about with funding, facilitating strong community involvement.
  • Easy Fundraising
    The platform simplifies the process of raising funds for open source projects, non-profits, and other community-driven initiatives.
  • Global Reach
    Open Collective supports contributions from around the world, which can significantly expand the pool of potential donors and supporters.
  • Managed Fiscal Hosting
    It provides fiscal hosting services that handle various financial and administrative tasks, reducing the workload for project maintainers.

Possible disadvantages of Open Collective

  • Fees
    Open Collective charges fees for its services, which can be a downside for projects with limited budgets.
  • Complexity for Small Projects
    For very small projects or initiatives, the platform might be overly complex and offer more features than needed.
  • Dependence on Platform
    Relying solely on Open Collective for funding and financial management might create dependency, limiting flexibility to switch strategies.
  • Geographical Limitations
    While it has global reach, there may be certain countries where donors or users face restrictions or limitations in using the platform.
  • Learning Curve
    New users might find the platform's features and options overwhelming at the start, requiring time to learn and navigate effectively.

Matrix.org videos

No Matrix.org videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Open Collective videos

What is Open Collective?

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Matrix.org and Open Collective)
Communication
100 100%
0% 0
Crowdfunding
0 0%
100% 100
Group Chat & Notifications
Fundraising And Donation Management

User comments

Share your experience with using Matrix.org and Open Collective. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Matrix.org and Open Collective

Matrix.org Reviews

Top 10 Team Chat Software for a Self-Hosted environment specifically designed for Large Enterprises
Matrix.org never charges. It's completely free. Its free servers are open to all for public registrations.

Open Collective Reviews

We have no reviews of Open Collective yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Matrix.org should be more popular than Open Collective. It has been mentiond 592 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Matrix.org mentions (592)

  • Top 10 European Open-Source Projects to Watch in 2025
    End-to-end encryption guarantees respect for privacy rules. Discover further: MATrix Official Site. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Ask HN: Open-source forum platform (HN style)
    NATHAN SCHNEIDER - GOVERNABLE SPACES DEMOCRATIC DESIGN FOR ONLINE LIFE Available as PDF in https://www.ucpress.edu/books/governable-spaces/paper Really full of great advice "Side" projects * https://www.loomio.com * https://matrix.org * https://opencollective.com. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Ergo Chat – A modern IRC server written in Go
    And if it's not, or you need something more secure, there's always Matrix. https://matrix.org. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • US Senators implore Department of Defense to expand the use of Matrix
    No, they're talking about this Matrix: https://matrix.org/ Relevant blog post: https://matrix.org/blog/2024/12/unrelated-cybercriminal-network-taken-down/. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
  • Show HN: Open-source private home security camera system (end-to-end encryption)
    Sure, just wanted to tell you about it, as this seems to be defacto standard for foss android apps, for example most if not all https://matrix.org clients use it for push notifications (when you use their de googled build, or don't have play services) available. I also use a Signal fork with UnifiedPush and have some server alert scripts which post to my self-hosted ntfy instance, and the ntfy app itself will... - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
View more

Open Collective mentions (159)

  • Funding in Open Source: A Conversation with Chad Whitacre
    Chad has been leading the Open Source Pledge, a simple framework to get companies to fund the projects they rely on. The idea is straightforward: for every developer your company employs, allocate $2,000 per year to open source. Distribute those funds however you want—GitHub Sponsors, Open Collective, Thanks.dev, direct payments, etc. The only other ask is to publish a blog post showing what you did. - Source: dev.to / 10 days ago
  • None of the top 10 projects in GitHub is actually a software project 🤯
    We see some projects that can financially survive (via sponsor or external infrastructure such as open collective or patreon), favoring the long-term sustainability. Thus, we keep our stand on promoting a transparent governance model to state where the investment will be managed and who can benefit from it, especially when knowing that non-technical users have an increasing key role in these communities. - Source: dev.to / 10 days ago
  • Sustainable Funding for Open Source: Navigating Challenges and Emerging Innovations
    Leverage multiple platforms: Utilize GitHub Sponsors along with OpenCollective to broaden funding sources. - Source: dev.to / 11 days ago
  • Exploring Open Source Project Sponsorship Opportunities: Enhancing Innovation with Blockchain and NFTs
    Traditionally, open source projects were sustained by volunteer contributions and modest donations. However, as digital infrastructure came to rely on open source software, the need for reliable, scalable funding became evident. Enter corporate sponsorship—a model where companies invest in open source initiatives to secure their technology stacks, attract top talent, and foster innovation. This has spurred the... - Source: dev.to / 12 days ago
  • Innovative Strategies for Open Source Project Funding: A Comprehensive Guide
    Abstract: This post explores various open source project funding strategies and examines their evolution, core concepts, applications, challenges, and future trends. We discuss methods such as sponsorship and donations, crowdfunding, dual licensing, paid services, foundations and grants, and the freemium model. Through real-world examples and a technical yet accessible approach, this guide offers insight into... - Source: dev.to / 13 days ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Matrix.org and Open Collective, you can also consider the following products

Element.io - Secure messaging app with strong end-to-end encryption, advanced group chat privacy settings, secure video calls for teams, encrypted communication using Matrix open network. Riot.im is now Element.

GitHub Sponsors - Get paid to build what you love on GitHub

Telegram - Telegram is a messaging app with a focus on speed and security. It’s superfast, simple and free.

Liberapay - Liberapay is a recurrent donations platform.

Signal - Fast, simple & secure messaging. Privacy that fits in your pocket.

Patreon - Patreon enables fans to give ongoing support to their favorite creators.