Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Matrix.org VS Converse.JS

Compare Matrix.org VS Converse.JS and see what are their differences

Matrix.org logo Matrix.org

Matrix is an open standard for decentralized persistent communication over IP.

Converse.JS logo Converse.JS

A free and open-source chat client for your website
  • Matrix.org Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-21
  • Converse.JS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-28

Matrix.org features and specs

  • Decentralization
    Matrix.org is built on a decentralized architecture, meaning no single entity controls the entire network. This ensures greater resilience, scalability, and prevents single points of failure.
  • Interoperability
    The platform is designed to bridge communications with other networks, such as Slack, IRC, and others, facilitating seamless interaction across different services.
  • End-to-End Encryption
    Matrix.org supports end-to-end encryption, ensuring that conversations are secure and private, and only accessible to the intended recipients.
  • Open-Source
    Matrix.org is an open-source project, allowing anyone to inspect, modify, and contribute to the code base, which promotes transparency and continuous improvement.
  • Rich Communication
    The platform supports a variety of communication forms, including text, voice, video, and file sharing, making it versatile for different use cases.

Possible disadvantages of Matrix.org

  • Complex Setup
    Setting up a Matrix server can be complex and resource-intensive, requiring technical expertise which may not be accessible to all users.
  • Latency
    Due to its decentralized nature, users might experience higher latency compared to centralized messaging platforms, particularly in global communications.
  • Limited Network
    While Matrix is growing, its network is still smaller compared to mainstream alternatives, which might affect user adoption and community size.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running a Matrix server can be resource-intensive in terms of memory and CPU usage, which might demand higher infrastructure costs.
  • Learning Curve
    Users and administrators might face a steep learning curve due to the complexity of Matrix's features and configurations.

Converse.JS features and specs

  • Open Source
    Converse.JS is open-source, which means that it is free to use and can be modified to fit specific needs. This allows for broad community support and contributions.
  • XMPP Protocol
    It operates on the XMPP protocol which is a mature and open standard for messaging, providing robust real-time messaging capabilities.
  • Easy Integration
    Converse.JS can be easily integrated into existing systems or web applications due to its flexibility and the fact that it is a JavaScript library.
  • Customizable
    The library offers a high level of customization, enabling developers to tailor the UI and features to closely match their application's needs.
  • Rich Features
    It supports features such as group chats, chat rooms, message archiving, and more, making it a comprehensive solution for chat functionalities.
  • Mobile Friendly
    Designed to be responsive, Converse.JS works well on mobile devices, providing a good user experience across different screen sizes.

Possible disadvantages of Converse.JS

  • Learning Curve
    While powerful, Converse.JS can have a steep learning curve for developers who are not familiar with XMPP or the intricacies of setting up chat services.
  • Requires Server Setup
    To function properly, Converse.JS requires a compatible XMPP server, which may add to the setup and maintenance overhead.
  • Browser Compatibility
    Some users might experience issues on older or less common browsers, as modern JavaScript libraries often rely on up-to-date browser capabilities.
  • Scalability Concerns
    For very large-scale applications, using XMPP and Converse.JS might require additional configuration and optimization efforts to ensure scalability.

Matrix.org videos

No Matrix.org videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Converse.JS videos

Real-Time Chat on the Web How to use XMPP and Converse.js to integrate webchat into any website

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Matrix.org and Converse.JS)
Communication
97 97%
3% 3
Group Chat & Notifications
Messaging
100 100%
0% 0
Customer Support
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Matrix.org and Converse.JS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Matrix.org and Converse.JS

Matrix.org Reviews

Top 10 Team Chat Software for a Self-Hosted environment specifically designed for Large Enterprises
Matrix.org never charges. It's completely free. Its free servers are open to all for public registrations.

Converse.JS Reviews

We have no reviews of Converse.JS yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Matrix.org seems to be a lot more popular than Converse.JS. While we know about 592 links to Matrix.org, we've tracked only 10 mentions of Converse.JS. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Matrix.org mentions (592)

  • Top 10 European Open-Source Projects to Watch in 2025
    End-to-end encryption guarantees respect for privacy rules. Discover further: MATrix Official Site. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Ask HN: Open-source forum platform (HN style)
    NATHAN SCHNEIDER - GOVERNABLE SPACES DEMOCRATIC DESIGN FOR ONLINE LIFE Available as PDF in https://www.ucpress.edu/books/governable-spaces/paper Really full of great advice "Side" projects * https://www.loomio.com * https://matrix.org * https://opencollective.com. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Ergo Chat – A modern IRC server written in Go
    And if it's not, or you need something more secure, there's always Matrix. https://matrix.org. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • US Senators implore Department of Defense to expand the use of Matrix
    No, they're talking about this Matrix: https://matrix.org/ Relevant blog post: https://matrix.org/blog/2024/12/unrelated-cybercriminal-network-taken-down/. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Show HN: Open-source private home security camera system (end-to-end encryption)
    Sure, just wanted to tell you about it, as this seems to be defacto standard for foss android apps, for example most if not all https://matrix.org clients use it for push notifications (when you use their de googled build, or don't have play services) available. I also use a Signal fork with UnifiedPush and have some server alert scripts which post to my self-hosted ntfy instance, and the ntfy app itself will... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
View more

Converse.JS mentions (10)

  • Ask HN: What Are You Working On? (February 2025)
    Taking a sabbatical and spending more time on an open source XMPP web client that I started 10 years ago already. https://conversejs.org The website is a bit old, but lots of exciting changes are happening under the hood and I finally have the time to make big architectural and performance improvements. - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago
  • An actually private messaging self hosted server
    I agree. IMHO the best variant is then to use something that is truely free. Like XMPP. There are a lot of servers and many clients to chose from and I can strongly recommend converse.js as a web client. It supports different ways of end to end encryption but I would recommend OMEMO which is basically the same encryption idea that you find in Signal. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Xmpp Bot with its own address.
    Hello, I recently started exploring xmpp, with snikket app and conversejs.org. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Matrix was worth the effort to self host.
    It is Converse.js (https://conversejs.org/) packaged into a one-click install for openfire (from the web admin). So, one-click install for an xmpp web client. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Ask HN: What is your recommended stack for real time chat?
    My choice, because it's the stack I know very well, would be Prosody ( https://prosody.im/ - I'm one of the devs) and a web client such as Converse.js ( https://conversejs.org/ ). XMPP is highly extensible, Prosody is highly modular, which make them a good foundation for building on top of. That said, the right stack is generally the one that matches your requirements, and (if this isn't primarily a learning... - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Matrix.org and Converse.JS, you can also consider the following products

Element.io - Secure messaging app with strong end-to-end encryption, advanced group chat privacy settings, secure video calls for teams, encrypted communication using Matrix open network. Riot.im is now Element.

tawk.to - tawk.to is a free live chat app that lets you monitor and chat with visitors on your website or from a free customizable page

Telegram - Telegram is a messaging app with a focus on speed and security. It’s superfast, simple and free.

Rocket.Chat - Rocket.Chat is a Web Chat Server, developed in JavaScript, using the Meteor fullstack framework.

Signal - Fast, simple & secure messaging. Privacy that fits in your pocket.

Openfire - Openfire (formerly Wildfire) is a cross-platform instant messaging (IM) and groupchat server.