Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Material Files VS Fossify File Manager

Compare Material Files VS Fossify File Manager and see what are their differences

Material Files logo Material Files

Material Design file manager for Android

Fossify File Manager logo Fossify File Manager

Easy app for managing your files without ads, respecting your privacy & security.
  • Material Files Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-08
Not present

Material Files features and specs

  • User Interface
    Material Files boasts a modern and sleek user interface that aligns with Material Design principles, making it intuitive and visually appealing for users.
  • Open Source
    Being an open-source project, users can contribute to the codebase, review the code for security, and potentially customize the application to fit their needs.
  • Active Development
    The project benefits from active development, meaning it receives updates, bug fixes, and new features regularly, enhancing its functionality and resolving user issues.
  • File Management Features
    Provides comprehensive file management features such as copy, move, delete, compress, extract, and more, enabling users to efficiently manage their files.
  • Privacy and Security
    As a local application, Material Files ensures better privacy and security since it does not inherently require internet access or upload data to remote servers.

Possible disadvantages of Material Files

  • Platform Limitation
    Material Files is primarily designed for Android, which limits its availability across other platforms like iOS or desktop operating systems.
  • Advanced Feature Limitations
    While it provides essential file management capabilities, it might lack some advanced features offered by other specialized file management apps, like file versioning or deep cloud integration.
  • Learning Curve
    New users unfamiliar with Material Design or Android navigation principles might experience a learning curve in understanding and using all the features effectively.
  • Dependence on Community
    Being community-driven, the progress and enhancements of the app depend significantly on community contribution and support, which can be inconsistent.
  • Possible Stability Issues
    As with many open-source projects, there might be occasional stability or performance issues, especially if the app is used on a wide range of device specifications.

Fossify File Manager features and specs

  • Open Source
    Fossify File Manager is open-source, allowing users to inspect, modify, and improve the code according to their needs.
  • Community Support
    Being a project hosted on GitHub, it benefits from community collaboration, improvements, and troubleshooting.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    Designed to work across multiple platforms, making it accessible to a broad user base.
  • Customization
    Users can customize the application to their liking due to the availability of source code.
  • Security Transparency
    Users can audit the code for potential security vulnerabilities, promoting better security practices.

Possible disadvantages of Fossify File Manager

  • Development Speed
    Open-source projects often rely on volunteer contributions, which can lead to slower development and fewer regular updates.
  • Limited Documentation
    Many open-source projects suffer from limited or unclear documentation, which might make it hard for new users to understand or use all features effectively.
  • Possible Compatibility Issues
    As with many open-source projects, compatibility with newer systems or third-party software can occasionally be a challenge.
  • Lack of Professional Support
    Unlike commercial software, open-source projects might not have dedicated support teams, leading users to rely on community forums for help.
  • Usability Issues
    Depending on contributions, there might be inconsistencies or usability issues that could make the software less intuitive than commercial alternatives.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Material Files and Fossify File Manager)
File Manager
45 45%
55% 55
File Explorer
42 42%
58% 58
FTP Client
44 44%
56% 56
Tool
49 49%
51% 51

User comments

Share your experience with using Material Files and Fossify File Manager. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Material Files and Fossify File Manager

Material Files Reviews

The best third-party file managers for Android
Once you fire it up, Material Files picks up on whether you're running dark or light mode, and you can choose between the old Material design or the latest flavor. For those who want a file explorer that opens on one particular directory every time, Material Files lets you set a default directory or bookmark other files and folders that you often access. Material Files also...

Fossify File Manager Reviews

We have no reviews of Fossify File Manager yet.
Be the first one to post

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Material Files and Fossify File Manager, you can also consider the following products

Total Commander - A Shareware file manager for Windows® 95/98/ME/NT/2000/XP/Vista/7, and Windows® 3.1.

Amaze File Manager - Free and open-source Android file manager with no ads.

Spacedrive - Combine your drives and clouds into one database that you can organize and explore from any device. Designed for creators, hoarders and the painfully disorganized.

Solid Explorer - Solid Explorer is a powerful Android file manager featuring access to most popular cloud storages, root access and easy extensibility.

Double Commander - Double Commander is a cross-platform open source file manager with two panels side by side.

MiXplorer - MiXplorer is a mobile app that was designed to make it easy to organize and manage the files on your Android device.