Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Material Design Kit VS Web.dev by Google

Compare Material Design Kit VS Web.dev by Google and see what are their differences

Material Design Kit logo Material Design Kit

Design for Android better and faster

Web.dev by Google logo Web.dev by Google

Learn how to build for the web and see where you stand 🌟
Not present
  • Web.dev by Google Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-20

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Material Design Kit and Web.dev by Google)
Design Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Online Services
0 0%
100% 100
Prototyping
100 100%
0% 0
SEO Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Material Design Kit and Web.dev by Google. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Web.dev by Google seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 126 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Material Design Kit mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Material Design Kit yet. Tracking of Material Design Kit recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Web.dev by Google mentions (126)

  • Old Dogs, New CSS Tricks
    It may be ran by Google, but https://web.dev/ is one good source for keeping up with new web technologies. - Source: Hacker News / 2 days ago
  • Lessons from open-source: Use window.trustedTypes to prevent DOM XSS.
    “If the sanitization logic in DOMPurify is buggy, your application might still have a DOM XSS vulnerability. Trusted Types force you to process a value somehow, but don’t yet define what the exact processing rules are, and whether they are safe.” — this caution from web.dev makes me want to play around with TrustedTypes more and get a better understanding. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Building a realtime chat app with Next.js and Vercel
    Before we start creating pages in our application, it's important to understand how Next.js renders content. The framework supports multiple rendering methods including server-side rendering (SSR), static site rendering (SSG), and client-side rendering (CSR). There are many pros and cons to each rendering method (too many to cover in this post) so if these concepts are new to you, Google’s web.dev site has a very... - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • Navigating the Waters of Core Web Vitals in 2024
    The lifecycle of an interaction. Source: web.dev. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • How hard has code splitting been in your experience?
    Probably not, it's the CSS used so far, so if there are elements you've not interacted with, that's an issue. This web.dev article gives some tools you can use https://web.dev/articles/extract-critical-css. Source: 6 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Material Design Kit and Web.dev by Google, you can also consider the following products

Tetrisly - Starter kit for design systems and wireframes builder (Sketch/Figma)

cutestat - Website Stats and Valuation. CuteStat.

Material Design Icons - 750 Free open-source glyphs by Google

Rankchart - Rankchart is one of the unique websites that allows you to examine your websites or watch competitors and locate rich information about website technologies, site reputation, errors, SEO, and ad-word recommendations.

React Rainbow Components - Build your web application in a snap.

Site Worth traffic - Site Worth traffic is a cost-effective site that is introduced to estimate the value, daily page views, daily visitors, and daily revenue of a website.