Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

MASSCAN VS MicroOLAP TCPDUMP

Compare MASSCAN VS MicroOLAP TCPDUMP and see what are their differences

MASSCAN logo MASSCAN

This is the fastest Internet port scanner.

MicroOLAP TCPDUMP logo MicroOLAP TCPDUMP

MicroOLAP TCPDUMP is a clone of ...
  • MASSCAN Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-04
  • MicroOLAP TCPDUMP Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-09-05

MASSCAN features and specs

  • Speed
    MASSCAN is known for its incredibly fast scanning capabilities, capable of scanning the entire Internet in under 6 minutes. It achieves this speed by sending packets asynchronously and using highly efficient network code.
  • Scalability
    The tool is highly scalable and can be used to scan large network ranges. It supports a range of port scanning methods, which makes it a versatile choice for different network environments.
  • Customizability
    MASSCAN allows users to customize their scanning tasks through extensive configuration options, including the ability to define specific ports, IP ranges, and rate limits, which can be tailored to meet specific project needs.
  • Cross-Platform
    MASSCAN is cross-platform and can be compiled and run on various operating systems, including Linux, Windows, and macOS, which makes it accessible to a wide range of users.

Possible disadvantages of MASSCAN

  • Lack of Detail
    While MASSCAN is excellent for fast scans and identifying open ports, it doesn't offer detailed service information or insights that more in-depth tools like Nmap provide, requiring supplementary tools for comprehensive scans.
  • Risk of Network Disruption
    Due to its high-speed scanning capabilities, MASSCAN can potentially overwhelm network devices or trigger firewalls and intrusion detection systems, posing a risk of network disruption if not managed carefully.
  • Requires Advanced Networking Knowledge
    The tool is designed for users with advanced networking knowledge, as improper configuration or use can result in inaccurate results or unintended network issues.
  • Legal and Ethical Concerns
    MASSCAN's ability to rapidly scan large network ranges can lead to legal and ethical concerns if used without proper authorization, making it essential for users to ensure compliance with applicable laws and regulations.

MicroOLAP TCPDUMP features and specs

  • Comprehensive Packet Analysis
    MicroOLAP TCPDUMP offers detailed network packet capture and analysis, enabling in-depth inspection of protocols and network traffic for troubleshooting and security assessment.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    The tool is available for multiple operating systems, including Windows, providing flexibility for network administrators who operate in diverse environments.
  • Graphical User Interface
    Unlike the traditional command-line tcpdump, MicroOLAP's version includes a GUI, making it more accessible for users who prefer or require a visual interface for network analysis tasks.

Possible disadvantages of MicroOLAP TCPDUMP

  • Pricing
    MicroOLAP TCPDUMP is a commercial product, which means users might face significant expenses, especially compared to free alternatives like Wireshark or the basic tcpdump.
  • Performance Overhead
    Running a GUI-based packet capture tool can introduce more system overhead compared to command-line tools, potentially affecting performance during extensive captures.
  • Complexity for Beginners
    While the tool is comprehensive, its extensive feature set might be overwhelming for beginners or those with limited networking experience who may find simpler tools more approachable.

MASSCAN videos

Tool Review - Masscan (Scan the whole internet)

More videos:

  • Review - SCANNING AT SCALE (masscan, nmap, axiom, recon.dev)

MicroOLAP TCPDUMP videos

No MicroOLAP TCPDUMP videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to MASSCAN and MicroOLAP TCPDUMP)
Monitoring Tools
64 64%
36% 36
Security
71 71%
29% 29
Log Management
0 0%
100% 100
Network Scanning
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using MASSCAN and MicroOLAP TCPDUMP. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare MASSCAN and MicroOLAP TCPDUMP

MASSCAN Reviews

15 Best Nmap Alternatives Network Security Scanner
Masscan has a capacity of as much as 1.6 million packets per second on its Linux version. That is not all, Masscan can scale up to a hundred million packets per second on a computer that is rigged with eight 10 Gpbs installed cards that run on PF RING driver.
Alternatives to Nmap: from simple to advanced network scanning
By default, Masscan’s scan rate is 100,000 packets-per-second. The macOS or Windows version of this tool can be set to 300,000 packets-per-second. On Linux, Masscan can do 1.6 million packets-per-second. But it can scan up to 100 million packets-per-second on a computer rigged with eight 10-Gbps network cards installed in it and running the PF_RING driver.

MicroOLAP TCPDUMP Reviews

We have no reviews of MicroOLAP TCPDUMP yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, MASSCAN seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 29 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

MASSCAN mentions (29)

  • Scanners Beware: Welcome to the Network from Hell
    It's a nice dream of "owning" the attackers but it doesn't have a real security value. [1] https://github.com/robertdavidgraham/masscan. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
  • What You Get After Running an SSH Honeypot for 30 Days
    A lot of these seem to use zmap (https://github.com/zmap/zmap) for the initial scan. Often with default parameters such as zmap setting ip id to 54321, having tcp initial window at 65535, having no SACK bit set and masscan with no SACK bit either, tcp initial window at 1024, tcp maximum segment size 1460 (which is strange to put below initial window size!), (older versions having fixed src port 61000 or 60000 from... - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago
  • Mass Scanning
    Can I get banned for mass scanning with https://github.com/robertdavidgraham/masscan or does it slow down any other vms from other persons? Source: about 2 years ago
  • Has anyone ever had their homelab or network hacked? What happened?
    Nope, this doesn't work any more. Shodan checks all ports (so any attackers using data from Shodan already know which ports you have open), and tools like masscan (https://github.com/robertdavidgraham/masscan) let you portscan the entire IPv4 address space in less than 10 minutes. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Private server intruded
    The discord user at the time used the tool "Masscan" to scan every 25565 port on the internet, he claims he was able to get the entire internet scanned in just a few minutes with a 512MB buyvm slice. Source: about 2 years ago
View more

MicroOLAP TCPDUMP mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of MicroOLAP TCPDUMP yet. Tracking of MicroOLAP TCPDUMP recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing MASSCAN and MicroOLAP TCPDUMP, you can also consider the following products

Nmap - Nmap Free Security Scanner, Port Scanner, & Network Exploration Tool. Download open source software for Linux, Windows, UNIX, FreeBSD, etc.

Winsock Packet Editor - WPE Pro is a packet editor.

Advanced IP Scanner - Advanced IP Scanner shows all network devices, gives you access to shared folders, and can even remotely switch computers off. Download it Free.

Scapy - Scapy is a powerful interactive packet manipulation program.

ZMap - ZMap is a fast single packet network scanner designed for Internet-wide network surveys.

Nipper - Nipper - Neat Internet Protocol Packet EditoR - is a graphical packet generation tool.