Yes, I learned this at https://masks4all.co. Source: 12 months ago

For future reference/search indexing, if anyone wanted this kind of info on cloth masks with pockets for PM2.5 filter inserts for friends and family members, I ended up finding the most information on https://masks4all.co/. Source: about 1 year ago

Interesting. I'm not sure how much I trust a site called masks4all.co to have a leveled opinion on the topic though, lol. Source: over 2 years ago

I doubt anyone that thinks masks don't work has actually tried doing scientific tests on masks and their ability to stop the spread of diseases such as covid-19. https://masks4all.co/. Source: almost 3 years ago

And just to be clear, https://masks4all.co/ is in the same league as you have just opposed, but further up you were for. Source: almost 3 years ago

Polaroids, these days, are really Impossible Project, rebranded as Polaroid. They also now have cameras that shoot different format sizes, but you are no longer limited to using vintage cameras. You can do the full-sized Polaroids, but consistency on the film batch-to-batch may not be as good as with Fujifilm. Source: almost 2 years ago

That said, if you really truly want oldtimey Polaroid feel and square prints, I would forego Instax and take a chance on the new Polaroid (fka the Impossible Project) cameras. The main issue will be the expense and consistency of the film. Fuji's much better, but the prints are tiny in comparison to full-sized Polaroids, even the square and wide formats. Source: almost 2 years ago

If you care more about the quality of the instant film print, then I'd say go look at the current Polaroid cameras (rebranded Impossible Project products, really). Source: over 2 years ago

I bought it here, but I think mine was limited edition. Source: over 2 years ago

If you're looking for something more in the $100 price range, maybe consider getting a new Polaroid or a Fuji Instax printer for her smartphone. Instant film/polaroid nostalgia can be fun, and this gear is brand new, and relatively low cost. Source: over 2 years ago