Marker.io

Website

marker.io

Pricing URL

Official Marker.io Pricing

$ Details

paid Free Trial $49.0 / Monthly (Up to 5 Users, Unlimited Integrations, Unlimited feedback)

Platforms

Browser Chrome OS Firefox Safari

Release Date

2017 June

Categories

#Web Development Tools #Visual Feeback #Visual Bug Reports #Error Tracking #Bug Trackers #QA #Feedback Widgets #Website Testing #Website Screenshots

Robot framework

Website

robotframework.org

Pricing URL

-

$ Details

Platforms

-

Release Date

-

Categories

#Automated Testing #Browser Testing #Website Testing #Testing

Marker.io features and specs

• Ease of Use
  Marker.io's user interface is intuitive, making it simple for users to capture feedback and report bugs directly from their browser.
• Integration Capabilities
  It seamlessly integrates with popular project management tools like Jira, Trello, Asana, GitHub, and more, allowing smooth workflow continuity.
• Visual Feedback
  Users can easily annotate screenshots to provide clear and visual feedback, which improves the quality and efficiency of reported issues.
• Real-time Collaboration
  The tool supports real-time collaboration, enabling team members to work together instantly on reported issues.
• Browser Extensions
  Browser extensions for Chrome, Firefox, and others provide convenience, making it easy to capture and report bugs directly from any web page.
• Automated Capture Details
  Automatically captures technical details about the user's environment (e.g., browser version, OS), which helps in diagnosing issues faster.

Possible disadvantages of Marker.io

• Cost
  The pricing can be high for small teams or freelancers, especially when scaling the number of users.
• Limited Customization
  While it integrates well with many tools, customization options within Marker.io itself can sometimes be limited, which may not fit all workflows.
• Learning Curve for Advanced Features
  While basic functionalities are easy to use, there can be a learning curve to leverage more advanced features effectively.
• Dependency on Third-Party Tools
  Heavy reliance on integrations means that any issues or limitations in the third-party tools can affect Marker.io's functionality.
• Internet Dependency
  As a cloud-based solution, an active internet connection is required to capture and report bugs, which can be a limitation in offline scenarios.
• Subscription Model
  The subscription-based pricing model may not be feasible for all users, and there's no one-time purchase option.

Robot framework features and specs

• Open Source
  Robot Framework is open-source, which means it is free to use and has a large community of users and contributors who continuously improve the tool and provide support.
• Extensible
  Its extensible nature allows easy integration with various libraries and tools. Custom libraries can also be added to extend its functionality further.
• Keyword-Driven Testing
  Utilizes a keyword-driven testing approach, making tests readable and simple to create even for non-programmers. This encourages collaboration between developers and non-technical stakeholders.
• Platform Independent
  Robot Framework is platform-independent and can be run on different operating systems like Windows, macOS, and Linux.
• Selenium Integration
  Offers seamless integration with Selenium, empowering it to be used for a wide range of web application testing tasks, from simple UI checks to complex automated workflows.
• Rich Reporting
  Generates comprehensive logs and reports that help in the easy identification of test results and issues. The reports are user-friendly and provide detailed execution flow.
• Data-Driven Testing
  Supports data-driven test cases, allowing tests to be executed with multiple sets of input data, enhancing test coverage.

Possible disadvantages of Robot framework

• Learning Curve
  For those unfamiliar with keyword-driven testing or the framework itself, there can be a learning curve, particularly in understanding how to best structure test cases and use the available libraries.
• Performance Overhead
  The high level of abstraction can introduce some performance overhead, making it less suitable for extremely performance-sensitive or low-level testing scenarios.
• Limited Mobile Testing
  While it supports mobile testing through Appium, the support and community resources for mobile testing are not as robust as for web application testing.
• Python Dependency
  It primarily relies on Python, which means that some organizations that use different programming languages might find it less straightforward to integrate and utilize effectively.
• Debugging Complexity
  Debugging can be less intuitive compared to traditional code-based frameworks. Errors can sometimes be harder to trace due to the abstraction layer provided by keyword-driven scripting.

Product tour

Robot Framework Tutorial | Robot Framework With Python | Python Robot Framework | Edureka

More videos: