Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Marker.io VS Codeship

Compare Marker.io VS Codeship and see what are their differences

IsDown.app
Monitor all your cloud services with our status page aggregator. IT teams choose IsDown to monitor all their vendors and get alerts whenever an outage occurs. Integration with Datadog, PagerDuty, Slack, Microsoft Teams, and a lot more. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Marker.io logo Marker.io

Visual feedback and bug reporting tool for websites

Codeship logo Codeship

Codeship is a fast and secure hosted Continuous Delivery platform that scales with your needs.
  • Marker.io Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-02

Collect website feedback from your team, clients, and users.

Get feedback with screenshots & technical metadata directly into your favorite project management tool.

Say goodbye to messy emails, spreadsheets and powerpoint. There is a better way!

  • Codeship Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-19

Marker.io

Website
marker.io
Pricing URL
Official Marker.io Pricing
$ Details
paid Free Trial $49.0 / Monthly (Up to 5 Users, Unlimited Integrations, Unlimited feedback)
Platforms
Browser Chrome OS Firefox Safari
Release Date
2017 June
Edit details

Codeship

Website
cloudbees.com
Pricing URL
Official Codeship Pricing
$ Details
-
Platforms
-
Release Date
-
Edit details

Marker.io features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Marker.io's user interface is intuitive, making it simple for users to capture feedback and report bugs directly from their browser.
  • Integration Capabilities
    It seamlessly integrates with popular project management tools like Jira, Trello, Asana, GitHub, and more, allowing smooth workflow continuity.
  • Visual Feedback
    Users can easily annotate screenshots to provide clear and visual feedback, which improves the quality and efficiency of reported issues.
  • Real-time Collaboration
    The tool supports real-time collaboration, enabling team members to work together instantly on reported issues.
  • Browser Extensions
    Browser extensions for Chrome, Firefox, and others provide convenience, making it easy to capture and report bugs directly from any web page.
  • Automated Capture Details
    Automatically captures technical details about the user's environment (e.g., browser version, OS), which helps in diagnosing issues faster.

Possible disadvantages of Marker.io

  • Cost
    The pricing can be high for small teams or freelancers, especially when scaling the number of users.
  • Limited Customization
    While it integrates well with many tools, customization options within Marker.io itself can sometimes be limited, which may not fit all workflows.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While basic functionalities are easy to use, there can be a learning curve to leverage more advanced features effectively.
  • Dependency on Third-Party Tools
    Heavy reliance on integrations means that any issues or limitations in the third-party tools can affect Marker.io's functionality.
  • Internet Dependency
    As a cloud-based solution, an active internet connection is required to capture and report bugs, which can be a limitation in offline scenarios.
  • Subscription Model
    The subscription-based pricing model may not be feasible for all users, and there's no one-time purchase option.

Codeship features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Codeship offers an intuitive interface that simplifies the setup process, making it accessible for developers who may not be experienced with continuous integration (CI) and continuous deployment (CD) tools.
  • Integration with Cloud Services
    Codeship integrates seamlessly with cloud services such as AWS, Google Cloud, and Heroku, facilitating easy deployment of applications.
  • Flexible Workflows
    The tool provides support for both Codeship Basic and Codeship Pro, allowing for flexibility in choosing between a more straightforward or a more customizable CI/CD workflow.
  • Docker Support
    Codeship Pro offers extensive support for Docker, allowing developers to use containerization strategies for their build and deployment processes.
  • Parallel Test Pipelines
    It supports parallel test pipelines, which can significantly speed up the testing process and reduce build times.
  • Slack Integration
    Codeship integrates with communication tools like Slack, enabling notifications and updates directly within team communication channels.

Possible disadvantages of Codeship

  • Cost
    Codeship can be more expensive compared to other CI/CD tools, particularly for larger teams or more complex projects that require more build resources.
  • Limited Customization
    For highly customized CI/CD processes, Codeship Basic might be limiting. Users may need to switch to Codeship Pro, which requires more configuration and a steeper learning curve.
  • Performance Bottlenecks
    Users have reported occasional performance bottlenecks, particularly under heavy workloads, which can slow down the CI/CD pipeline.
  • Plugin Ecosystem
    The plugin ecosystem for Codeship is not as extensive as some other CI/CD tools like Jenkins, potentially limiting its integration capabilities.
  • Learning Curve
    While Codeship Basic is relatively easy to use, Codeship Pro has a steeper learning curve, particularly for users who are new to Docker and advanced CI/CD practices.
  • Support
    Although support is available, some users have reported slower response times and less comprehensive support compared to other CI/CD platforms.

Marker.io videos

+ Add

Product tour

Codeship videos

+ Add

LinuxFest Northwest 2017: Continuous Delivery to Microsoft Azure with Docker through Codeship

More videos:

  • Review - The Codeship -- Continuous Deployment made simple

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Marker.io and Codeship)

Marker.io

Codeship

Visual Bug Reports
100 100%
Visual Bug Reports
0% 0
Continuous Integration
0 0%
Continuous Integration
100% 100
Web Development Tools
100 100%
Web Development Tools
0% 0
DevOps Tools
0 0%
DevOps Tools
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Marker.io and Codeship. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Marker.io and Codeship

Marker.io Reviews

Top 17 Best Bug Tracking Tools: an overview 19 Jun 2017
With this tool, users can convert screenshots from any website into a powerful bug report directly into your existing tools. Key features of Marker include screenshot annotation tools, shareable links and workflow integration. The tool can be integrated with tools such as Jira, Slack, Trello and Github (scrum and project management tools).
Source: mopinion.com
Top 10 Bug Tracking Tools for Web Developers and Designers
Marker is a bug tracker tool built with a wide variety of options to collaborate different tools and get every attention of web developer totally. It can capture information pertaining to the environment from which the bug was noticed and this could be of acutest levels like zoom, pixel ratio and user agent. This reduces a lot of frustration and development time when...
Source: www.w2ssolutions.com

Codeship Reviews

The Best Alternatives to Jenkins for Developers
Codeship, a CI/CD platform based in the cloud, has an interface that is easy for users and it can integrate with numerous tools and services people are familiar with. It works well for different programming languages and platforms, which makes it suitable for many teams involved in development work.
Source: morninglif.com
Top 10 Most Popular Jenkins Alternatives for DevOps in 2024
CodeShip is a CloudBees SaaS platform that provides a managed CI/CD experience in the cloud. It’s designed to give control back to developers by providing a guided workflow for creating and maintaining CI/CD pipelines. This avoids much of the complexity that’s associated with Jenkins.
Source: spacelift.io
10 Jenkins Alternatives in 2021 for Developers
You could consider using CodeShip to help you to optimize CI/CD cloud deployment. CodeShip can be used by just about any type of development team that looks to increase the efficiency and automation of their code delivery. You can get started within minutes and gain access to an incredible amount of control when setting everything up. The customization options will seem...
Source: solutionsuggest.com
The Best Alternatives to Jenkins for Developers
CodeShip is a hosted continuous integration and continuous delivery platform found by CloudBees. It provides fast feedback and customized environments to build applications. It provides integration with almost anything and is good at helping you scale as per your needs. It comes free for up to 100 monthly builds.
Source: www.lambdatest.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Marker.io seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 8 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Marker.io mentions (8)

  • UAT: A Quick Overview
    Marker.io is a feedback tool that allows users to attach product comments to a given UI component in an app. It’s overlaid on the UAT environment, and allows users to export screenshots and logs alongside their review comments. User feedback comments can be automatically converted to tickets. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Show HN: Pain of Requesting Screen Recordings/Screenshots from Users
    This is a really nice note and solution of the problem. What is the difference from your competitor https://marker.io/? - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • Looking for a self-hosted marker.io alternative (FOSS) - Open Source Visual Feedback and Bug Tracking / reporting tool for websites
    I'm looking for a free and/or open source self-hosted alternative to marker.io for visual bug tracking/reporting. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Best bug tracker for small team (1 full-time dev)?
    Also keep an eye on this discussion to make issue forms available on private repos. Until this is possible, marker.io & Linear are a solution. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Distinguishing a painkiller from a vitamin
    I work for a really small startup ( https://marker.io ) that focuses on drastically improving website feedback workflows for agencies/ clients. In some cases agencies say:. Source: about 3 years ago
View more

Codeship mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Codeship yet. Tracking of Codeship recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Marker.io and Codeship, you can also consider the following products

BugHerd - BugHerd: The Website Feedback Tool for Agencies

Jenkins - Jenkins is an open-source continuous integration server with 300+ plugins to support all kinds of software development

Usersnap - Usersnap is a customer feedback software for SaaS companies that need to constantly improve and grow their products.

CircleCI - CircleCI gives web developers powerful Continuous Integration and Deployment with easy setup and maintenance.

Bird Eats Bug - Saw a bug? Send an instant replay to engineers. It will come with console logs and everything. Developers will ❤️ you.

Travis CI - Simple, flexible, trustworthy CI/CD tools. Join hundreds of thousands who define tests and deployments in minutes, then scale up simply with parallel or multi-environment builds using Travis CI’s precision syntax—all with the developer in mind.

Loading...