Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Marker.io VS Apify

Compare Marker.io VS Apify and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Marker.io logo Marker.io

Visual feedback and bug reporting tool for websites

Apify logo Apify

Apify is a web scraping and automation platform that can turn any website into an API.
  • Marker.io Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-02

Collect website feedback from your team, clients, and users.

Get feedback with screenshots & technical metadata directly into your favorite project management tool.

Say goodbye to messy emails, spreadsheets and powerpoint. There is a better way!

  • Apify Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-30

Apify is a JavaScript & Node.js based data extraction tool for websites that crawls lists of URLs and automates workflows on the web. With Apify you can manage and automatically scale a pool of headless Chrome / Puppeteer instances, maintain queues of URLs to crawl, store crawling results locally or in the cloud, rotate proxies and much more.

Marker.io

Website
marker.io
$ Details
paid Free Trial $49.0 / Monthly (Up to 5 Users, Unlimited Integrations, Unlimited feedback)
Platforms
Browser Chrome OS Firefox Safari
Release Date
2017 June

Apify

Website
apify.com
$ Details
-
Platforms
-
Release Date
-
Startup details
Country
Czech Republic
City
Prague
Employees
10 - 19

Marker.io features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Marker.io's user interface is intuitive, making it simple for users to capture feedback and report bugs directly from their browser.
  • Integration Capabilities
    It seamlessly integrates with popular project management tools like Jira, Trello, Asana, GitHub, and more, allowing smooth workflow continuity.
  • Visual Feedback
    Users can easily annotate screenshots to provide clear and visual feedback, which improves the quality and efficiency of reported issues.
  • Real-time Collaboration
    The tool supports real-time collaboration, enabling team members to work together instantly on reported issues.
  • Browser Extensions
    Browser extensions for Chrome, Firefox, and others provide convenience, making it easy to capture and report bugs directly from any web page.
  • Automated Capture Details
    Automatically captures technical details about the user's environment (e.g., browser version, OS), which helps in diagnosing issues faster.

Possible disadvantages of Marker.io

  • Cost
    The pricing can be high for small teams or freelancers, especially when scaling the number of users.
  • Limited Customization
    While it integrates well with many tools, customization options within Marker.io itself can sometimes be limited, which may not fit all workflows.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While basic functionalities are easy to use, there can be a learning curve to leverage more advanced features effectively.
  • Dependency on Third-Party Tools
    Heavy reliance on integrations means that any issues or limitations in the third-party tools can affect Marker.io's functionality.
  • Internet Dependency
    As a cloud-based solution, an active internet connection is required to capture and report bugs, which can be a limitation in offline scenarios.
  • Subscription Model
    The subscription-based pricing model may not be feasible for all users, and there's no one-time purchase option.

Apify features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Apify provides a user-friendly interface that makes it easy for users of all technical levels to create and manage web scraping tasks.
  • Scalability
    Apify is built to handle tasks of various sizes, from small-scale projects to enterprise-level operations, making it a scalable solution.
  • Integration and API Support
    It offers extensive API support, allowing for seamless integration with other tools and systems to enhance automated workflows.
  • Customizability
    Users can customize their scraping bots (actors) with different settings and scripts to fit specific needs and requirements.
  • Cloud-based
    Being a cloud-based platform, Apify allows users to run their scraping tasks without needing local resources, which is convenient and efficient.
  • Comprehensive Documentation
    Apify provides thorough documentation and tutorials, which help users get started quickly and solve issues efficiently.
  • Community and Support
    Apify has an active community and solid customer support to assist users with their needs and enhance their overall experience.

Possible disadvantages of Apify

  • Learning Curve
    While the interface is user-friendly, there may still be a learning curve for those new to web scraping and automation.
  • Cost
    Apify can be expensive compared to other web scraping tools, particularly for extensive use cases that require high volumes of data.
  • Dependency on External Factors
    Web scraping often depends on the stability of the target websites. Changes in website structures can break scripts, requiring ongoing maintenance.
  • Performance Limitations
    The performance of cloud-based scraping tasks can be affected by network latency and other external factors beyond user control.
  • Potential Legal Issues
    Web scraping can raise legal concerns, particularly when scraping data from websites that restrict such activities in their terms of service.
  • Resource Intensity
    Complex scraping tasks can be resource-intensive, potentially requiring higher-tier subscriptions and more computing resources, driving up costs.

Marker.io videos

Product tour

Apify videos

Apify product news - 2019/01/30

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Marker.io and Apify)
Visual Bug Reports
100 100%
0% 0
Web Scraping
0 0%
100% 100
Web Development Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Data Extraction
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Marker.io and Apify. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Marker.io and Apify

Marker.io Reviews

Top 17 Best Bug Tracking Tools: an overview 19 Jun 2017
With this tool, users can convert screenshots from any website into a powerful bug report directly into your existing tools. Key features of Marker include screenshot annotation tools, shareable links and workflow integration. The tool can be integrated with tools such as Jira, Slack, Trello and Github (scrum and project management tools).
Source: mopinion.com
Top 10 Bug Tracking Tools for Web Developers and Designers
Marker is a bug tracker tool built with a wide variety of options to collaborate different tools and get every attention of web developer totally. It can capture information pertaining to the environment from which the bug was noticed and this could be of acutest levels like zoom, pixel ratio and user agent. This reduces a lot of frustration and development time when...

Apify Reviews

Top 15 Best TinyTask Alternatives in 2022
This is another tinytask alternative. For you to link various web services and APIs, Apify has provided many web integration options. You can add data processing and customised computation processes in addition to letting the data flow between them. With the data that is freely accessible on the web, you may provide crucial insights, and easy lead creation allows you to...

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apify should be more popular than Marker.io. It has been mentiond 26 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Marker.io mentions (8)

  • UAT: A Quick Overview
    Marker.io is a feedback tool that allows users to attach product comments to a given UI component in an app. It’s overlaid on the UAT environment, and allows users to export screenshots and logs alongside their review comments. User feedback comments can be automatically converted to tickets. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Show HN: Pain of Requesting Screen Recordings/Screenshots from Users
    This is a really nice note and solution of the problem. What is the difference from your competitor https://marker.io/? - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • Looking for a self-hosted marker.io alternative (FOSS) - Open Source Visual Feedback and Bug Tracking / reporting tool for websites
    I'm looking for a free and/or open source self-hosted alternative to marker.io for visual bug tracking/reporting. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Best bug tracker for small team (1 full-time dev)?
    Also keep an eye on this discussion to make issue forms available on private repos. Until this is possible, marker.io & Linear are a solution. Source: about 3 years ago
  • Distinguishing a painkiller from a vitamin
    I work for a really small startup ( https://marker.io ) that focuses on drastically improving website feedback workflows for agencies/ clients. In some cases agencies say:. Source: about 3 years ago
View more

Apify mentions (26)

  • How to scrape TikTok using Python
    For deployment, we'll use the Apify platform. It's a simple and effective environment for cloud deployment, allowing efficient interaction with your crawler. Call it via API, schedule tasks, integrate with various services, and much more. - Source: dev.to / 21 days ago
  • How to scrape Bluesky with Python
    We already have a fully functional implementation for local execution. Let us explore how to adapt it for running on the Apify Platform and transform in Apify Actor. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Web scraping with GPT-4o: powerful but expensive
    We've had the best success by first converting the HTML to a simpler format (i.e. markdown) before passing it to the LLM. There are a few ways to do this that we've tried, namely Extractus[0] and dom-to-semantic-markdown[1]. Internally we use Apify[2] and Firecrawl[3] for Magic Loops[4] that run in the cloud, both of which have options for simplifying pages built-in, but for our Chrome Extension we use... - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
  • Current problems and mistakes of web scraping in Python and tricks to solve them!
    Developed by Apify, it is a Python adaptation of their famous JS framework crawlee, first released on Jul 9, 2019. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • Show HN: Crawlee for Python – a web scraping and browser automation library
    Hey all, This is Jan, the founder of [Apify](https://apify.com/)—a full-stack web scraping platform. After the success of [Crawlee for JavaScript](https://github.com/apify/crawlee/) today! The main features are: - A unified programming interface for both HTTP (HTTPX with BeautifulSoup) & headless browser crawling (Playwright). - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Marker.io and Apify, you can also consider the following products

BugHerd - BugHerd: The Website Feedback Tool for Agencies

import.io - Import. io helps its users find the internet data they need, organize and store it, and transform it into a format that provides them with the context they need.

Usersnap - Usersnap is a customer feedback software for SaaS companies that need to constantly improve and grow their products.

Scrapy - Scrapy | A Fast and Powerful Scraping and Web Crawling Framework

Bird Eats Bug - Saw a bug? Send an instant replay to engineers. It will come with console logs and everything. Developers will ❤️ you.

ParseHub - ParseHub is a free web scraping tool. With our advanced web scraper, extracting data is as easy as clicking the data you need.