Markdown by DaringFireball VS Stripe Chargeback Protection

In today's fast-paced tech world, giving effective presentations is crucial for conveying complex ideas and engaging audiences. While Markdown has emerged as a popular lightweight markup language for creating rich text documents, its use in creating dynamic, interactive, and visually appealing presentations can be challenging. This is where Marp comes into the picture - an open-source Markdown presentation app... - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago

It's just CommonMark, Gruber was ticked off enough that he declined to allow them to use the term Markdown at all. Alone among the variations, or nearly so, he's fine (as your link indicates) with Git-Flavored Markdown. The thing is, they didn't fork it, they decided to "standardize" it. John Gruber had already published a Markdown standard: https://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/, and a reference... - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago

Aha that's just an inline footnote, we support both in Supernotes. So you can quickly write ^[Name of Reference] (that will auto assign it the number 1 once rendered) rather than [^1] ... [1]: Name of Reference. Footnotes aren't part of the original Markdown specification (https://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/). - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago

Markdown is a text markup language. It's widely adapted. For example, github repo's will detect the readme.md file in the current directory and display it below. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago

Note, that this file is a Markdown and YAML file at the same time, and as such human- and machine-readable, if the fields are filled carefully. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago

Yea, unfortunately Stripe doesn’t make these decisions. Couple things you could consider: * Adding additional verification steps like Stripe Identity * Requiring 3DS, which shifts loss liability in some cases to the card issuer * Using Stripe Checkout with Chargeback Protection: https://stripe.com/radar/chargeback-protection. It costs 0.4%, but you wouldn’t need to worry about losses at all (up to a certain volume... Source: almost 2 years ago

You could consider looking into using Chargeback Protection, which will add to your processing fee, but will protect you from loss from chargebacks on eligible transactions (i.e., purchase made via the Checkout). You won't have to provide evidence, you won't lose the money (up to a certain amount per year); it's essentially an insurance system. And from my reading of their docs, I don't think you'd have to deal... Source: about 2 years ago

I have seen companies out there that specialize in combatting chagebacks for businesses. Basically any chargeback that happens, the company takes care of disputing it. For a company like yourself that processes high dollar transactions/products/services, you may do well to seek such a company and use their service, get your own merchant account and stop using 3rd party processors. Stripe has a chargeback... Source: about 2 years ago

Stripe offers Payment Links [0], which makes it really easy to accept payments (just paste a link into your product page and handle a webhook serverside; a single href is adequate). They also have a separate "Checkout" offering [1], which requires some code client- and server-side to generate the page. So far, Stripe has been awesome for me selling $2.50/mo subscriptions [2], and as far as I know, suspicious... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago

Right, Apple is only providing the hardware and it requires to use a (partnered) processor, like Stripe, which was the example they used in their recent announcement. Stripe coincidentally sells chargeback protection as a service https://stripe.com/radar/chargeback-protection if that is a concern. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago