Software Alternatives & Reviews

MarkDeck VS WebSlides

Compare MarkDeck VS WebSlides and see what are their differences

MarkDeck logo MarkDeck

Create offline-ready slideshows with Markdown

WebSlides logo WebSlides

Easily create great-looking HTML presentations.
  • MarkDeck Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-20
Not present

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to MarkDeck and WebSlides)
Presentations
13 13%
87% 87
Slideshow
14 14%
86% 86
Graphic Design Software
22 22%
78% 78
Design Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using MarkDeck and WebSlides. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, MarkDeck seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

MarkDeck mentions (1)

  • Slidev โ€“ slides for developers, powered by Vite and Vue 3
    Being Docker based, MarkDeck is my go to slide app. https://arnehilmann.github.io/markdeck/. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago

WebSlides mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of WebSlides yet. Tracking of WebSlides recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing MarkDeck and WebSlides, you can also consider the following products

Marp - Markdown presentation writer, powered by Electron

Draftsend - Presentations you can ๐Ÿ‘€ and ๐Ÿ‘‚

Remark - A simple, in-browser, markdown-driven slideshow tool.

Slidebean - Presentations that design themselves

Madoko - Madoko is a fast markdown processor for writing professional articles, books, manuals, webpages and...

Slides - Slides is a place for creating, presenting and sharing presentations. The Slides editor is available right in your browser. Unlike traditional presentation software, like PowerPoint, there's no need to download anything.