Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Makeswift VS W3C Mobile Checker

Compare Makeswift VS W3C Mobile Checker and see what are their differences

Makeswift logo Makeswift

🎨 No-code website builder with the power & detail of a design tool⠀✌️ Say goodbye to rigid templates to let your creativity come to life⠀👯‍♀️ Collaborate in real time with your team⠀⚡️ Visually build high-performing websites powered by Next.

W3C Mobile Checker logo W3C Mobile Checker

Make websites work better on mobile devices
  • Makeswift Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-14
  • W3C Mobile Checker Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-02-28

Makeswift features and specs

  • Easy to Use
    Makeswift is designed with a user-friendly interface, making website building intuitive and accessible even for those with little to no technical experience.
  • Drag-and-Drop Functionality
    The platform offers drag-and-drop functionality, allowing users to customize their websites easily without needing to write any code.
  • Customization Options
    Users have access to a wide variety of design elements and templates, enabling them to create personalized websites that meet their specific needs.
  • Responsive Design
    Websites built with Makeswift are responsive, ensuring they look and function well on a variety of devices, including mobile phones and tablets.
  • Integration Capabilities
    Makeswift supports integrations with various third-party tools and services, allowing users to extend the functionality of their websites.

Possible disadvantages of Makeswift

  • Limited Advanced Features
    While Makeswift is great for basic website building, it may lack some advanced features required by professional developers or for complex projects.
  • Pricing
    Depending on the plan chosen, the pricing might be a barrier for individuals or small businesses with limited budgets.
  • Dependency on Platform
    Users are reliant on Makeswift's platform, meaning any downtime or service issues could affect website availability and performance.
  • SEO Optimization Limitations
    Some users might find the SEO features to be less comprehensive compared to those offered by dedicated SEO tools.
  • Learning Curve for Complex Customizations
    While basic customization is straightforward, users attempting complex customizations may face a steeper learning curve.

W3C Mobile Checker features and specs

  • Standard Compliance
    W3C Mobile Checker helps ensure that web pages comply with web standards and best practices set by the World Wide Web Consortium. This is crucial for maintaining consistency and accessibility across different devices.
  • Mobile Compatibility
    It specifically focuses on checking the mobile-responsiveness of a website, which is increasingly important as more users access the web from mobile devices.
  • Error Identification
    The tool identifies issues related to mobile design and functionality, allowing developers to fix problems that might hinder the mobile user experience.
  • Improved SEO
    By ensuring mobile compatibility, the W3C Mobile Checker can indirectly contribute to better search engine optimization, since mobile-friendliness is a ranking factor for search engines.
  • Free and Open Access
    Being a tool developed by W3C, it is freely accessible online, making it easy for developers to use without any cost barriers.

Possible disadvantages of W3C Mobile Checker

  • Limited to Mobile Checks
    While focused on mobile compatibility, it does not provide comprehensive validation for other aspects of a website, such as desktop compatibility or performance.
  • Alpha Release
    Being an 'alpha' version, it may have incomplete features or bugs, potentially leading to inaccurate validation results or a less polished user experience.
  • Technical Knowledge Requirement
    Developers need some level of technical understanding to interpret the results and implement recommended changes, which can be challenging for beginners.
  • No Direct Fix Suggestions
    While it identifies issues, the tool may not provide detailed suggestions or solutions on how to fix the identified problems, requiring additional research or expertise from the user.
  • Outdated Information
    Web technologies and standards evolve quickly, and as an alpha version, there's a risk that some checks might be based on outdated standards or practices.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Makeswift and W3C Mobile Checker)
Website Builder
71 71%
29% 29
Design Tools
80 80%
20% 20
CMS
73 73%
27% 27
Personal Website
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Makeswift and W3C Mobile Checker. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Makeswift and W3C Mobile Checker, you can also consider the following products

Unstack - Build high performance websites, blogs, and landing pages that integrate with your existing marketing stack to drive traffic, leads, and sales for your business.

Dimensions Toolkit - Chrome Extension for designers to test responsive websites.

Dorik - Dorik AI Website Builder | Create Beautiful and Custom Websites in Minutes with AI– No Coding Needed

Flexbox Grid - Grid based on CSS3 flexbox

mmm.page - Dead simple, drag & drop personal websites

One Click Test - Tool for quickly testing your design layout in one click.