Software Alternatives & Reviews
Register | Login

MakeMe VS Buck

Compare MakeMe VS Buck and see what are their differences

Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

MakeMe logo MakeMe

Building Software Made Simple

Buck logo Buck

A high-performance build tool for Android by Facebook
  • MakeMe Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-16
  • Buck Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-03-29

MakeMe videos

No MakeMe videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Buck videos

+ Add

Buck HONEST Operator Review | Rainbow Six Siege

More videos:

  • Review - Unbreakable Pocket Knife Destruction Test - Buck 110 review
  • Review - Buck 110 review after carrying for 9 years

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to MakeMe and Buck)

MakeMe

Buck

JS Build Tools
52 52%
JS Build Tools
48% 48
Front End Package Manager
41 41%
Front End Package Manager
59% 59
Development
52 52%
Development
48% 48
JavaScript Package Manager
47 47%
JavaScript Package Manager
53% 53

User comments

Share your experience with using MakeMe and Buck. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Buck seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 8 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

MakeMe mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of MakeMe yet. Tracking of MakeMe recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Buck mentions (8)

  • Compiling a single-file app with csc.dll
    We use Buck company wide. Our packaging / deployment system, for example, expects to be given a Buck target to build, not a pre-built binary - I can’t just build my app with dotnet and upload it. While it is possible for a Buck target to be a simple bash command (i.e dotnet publish), doing so makes the target “opaque” - Buck wouldn’t have any knowledge of my app’s build graph so I’d lose many of the benefits it... Source: 11 months ago
  • Just: A Command Runner
    Oh excellent, then better (and more portable!) tools are available: http://pants.build https://ninja-build.org https://buck.build and, if you hate yourself: https://bazel.build. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Dev Discussions: Everything You Need to Know about Monorepos with Juri Strumpflohner of Nrwl
    Pioneered by tech giants like Google and Meta with tools like Bazel and Buck, monorepos are seeing widespread adoption across companies of all sizes and industries. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
  • Using URLs for dependency management
    Buck has a http_file() that you can use this way, and it has first-class support for Java. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Is it possible to be an android developer ONLY with the documentation?
    That's a good bridge into saying that we don't use pretty much any standard tooling. Our build system is Buck, we use Mercurial instead of Git, and the IDE of choice seems to be Visual Studio (although Android Studio is supported, with some custom plugins required). Source: about 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing MakeMe and Buck, you can also consider the following products

GNU Make - GNU Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.

Ninja Build - Ninja is a small build system with a focus on speed.

SCons - SCons is an Open Source software construction tool—that is, a next-generation build tool.

Meson - Meson is an open source build system meant to be both extremely fast, and, even more importantly...

npm - npm is a package manager for Node.

CMake - CMake is an open-source, cross-platform family of tools designed to build, test and package software.

Loading...