Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Mail Tester VS Screenster

Compare Mail Tester VS Screenster and see what are their differences

DocRaptor
As the only API powered by the Prince HTML-to-PDF engine, DocRaptor provides the best support for complex PDFs with powerful support for headers, page breaks, page numbers, flexbox, watermarks, accessible PDFs, and much more featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Mail Tester logo Mail Tester

Test the spamminess of your email

Screenster logo Screenster

10x faster UI testing without a line of code.
  • Mail Tester Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-22
  • Screenster Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-19

Mail Tester features and specs

  • User-friendly Interface
    Mail Tester features an intuitive and straightforward interface that makes it easy for users to understand and navigate the tool, even without advanced technical knowledge.
  • Detailed Feedback
    The tool provides comprehensive feedback on various facets of your email, including spam score, blacklists, and suggestions for improvement, which are crucial for optimizing email deliverability.
  • Free Basic Service
    Mail Tester offers a free tier for basic testing needs, providing an accessible option for individuals and small businesses to improve their email campaigns without financial commitment.
  • Spam and Content Analysis
    It checks the email content against major spam filters and gives a detailed analysis that helps users understand how their email may be perceived by spam detectors.
  • Ease of Integration
    Mail Tester's service can be easily integrated into various email platforms, facilitating smooth operation within existing workflows.

Possible disadvantages of Mail Tester

  • Limited Free Features
    While the free tier is useful, it comes with limitations such as a lower number of tests and less detailed analysis compared to the paid versions, which might not fully meet the needs of power users or larger organizations.
  • Paid Options Can Be Expensive
    For more advanced features, users need to subscribe to paid plans, which can be relatively costly, particularly for small businesses or individuals.
  • Data Privacy Concerns
    Some users might have concerns about data privacy, especially when sending test emails that could contain sensitive information, despite their privacy policy assuring data security.
  • Occasional Inaccuracy
    There have been reports from users about occasional inaccuracies in the analysis, which can lead to incorrect improvements being made based on the feedback provided.
  • No Real-time Monitoring
    Mail Tester does not provide real-time monitoring or continuous assessment of email deliverability, limiting its usefulness for ongoing campaign management.

Screenster features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Screenster offers a user-friendly interface that allows users to easily navigate and set up their automated tests without needing extensive coding knowledge.
  • Visual Regression Testing
    Screenster provides robust visual regression testing capabilities, allowing you to detect any visual changes in your web applications effectively.
  • Cloud-Based
    Because it's a cloud-based solution, Screenster does not require any complex local setup, contributing to ease of accessibility and reduced maintenance.
  • Team Collaboration
    Screenster provides features that enhance team collaboration, such as shared test projects and dashboards for team visibility.
  • Smart Comparison Algorithms
    It features smart algorithms to compare screenshots accurately, which helps in flagging only the meaningful changes and reducing false positives.

Possible disadvantages of Screenster

  • Pricing
    Screenster can be relatively expensive compared to some other test automation tools, especially for smaller businesses or individual developers.
  • Limited Programming Language Support
    The platform may have limited support for various programming languages and integrations, confining more experienced developers who prefer custom scripting.
  • Dependency on Network
    Being a cloud-based solution means that it is highly dependent on network stability and speed, which might be a limitation in environments with poor connectivity.
  • Scalability
    As of the latest data, some users have reported that Screenster may not scale well for extremely large projects or enterprise-level testing requirements.
  • Learning Curve for Complex Scenarios
    While it's easy to use for basic tests, setting up complex testing scenarios can still have a learning curve, requiring additional time and effort to master.

Analysis of Mail Tester

Overall verdict

  • Mail Tester is generally seen as a reliable and effective tool for evaluating email deliverability and optimizing email campaigns. It is particularly useful for businesses and individuals who need to ensure that their emails reach the intended recipients without being flagged as spam.

Why this product is good

  • Mail Tester is often considered a good tool because it allows users to analyze and improve the deliverability of their emails. It provides a detailed report on various aspects, including spam score, SPF/DKIM configurations, and content analysis. This helps users identify potential issues that could cause emails to end up in spam folders.

Recommended for

  • Email marketers
  • Small businesses
  • Freelancers
  • Individuals managing email campaigns
  • Technical teams responsible for email deliverability

Analysis of Screenster

Overall verdict

  • Screenster is considered a good tool for teams looking to streamline their UI testing processes without investing heavily in manual testing or complex scripting. Its features are particularly beneficial for teams that need a quick setup and straightforward operation.

Why this product is good

  • Screenster is a cloud-based visual regression testing tool aimed at simplifying UI testing processes. It automatically captures and monitors visual changes in the UI over time, reducing the effort required to manually spot differences. The platform is designed to be user-friendly, supporting no-code test creation, making it accessible to both technical and non-technical team members. It integrates with CI/CD pipelines and supports cross-browser testing.

Recommended for

    Screenster is recommended for small to medium-sized development teams, QAs, or businesses that want to implement efficient UI testing without extensive overhead. It's also suitable for teams that need frequent UI updates and want to ensure visual consistency across different browsers.

Mail Tester videos

+ Add

Email Deliverability - How to Use Mail Tester com to Check the Spammyness of your Email

More videos:

  • Review - Text Emails VS HTML Emails Using Mail Tester.com

Screenster videos

+ Add

Editing UI Tests with Screenster

More videos:

  • Review - Toddy Screenster Hands-On Review
  • Review - Gmail visual testing automation with Screenster

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Mail Tester and Screenster)

Mail Tester

Screenster

Website Testing
61 61%
Website Testing
39% 39
Email
100 100%
Email
0% 0
Browser Testing
44 44%
Browser Testing
56% 56
Automated Testing
0 0%
Automated Testing
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Mail Tester and Screenster. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Mail Tester and Screenster

Mail Tester Reviews

We have no reviews of Mail Tester yet.
Be the first one to post

Screenster Reviews

20 BEST Selenium Alternatives in 2021
Screenster is a cloud-based UI testing platform. It is used for visual regression testing of web applications and websites. It is one of the best selenium webdriver alternatives that captures a screenshot of each step and stores it as a baseline.
Source: www.guru99.com
Top 10 Best Selenium Alternatives You Should Try
Screenster is an ultimate visual regression testing tool for websites and web applications. It provides a cloud-based platform to perform UI (User Interface) automation testing. Screenster promises 10 times more productivity than other Selenium alternatives.
Source: www.softwaretestinghelp.com
Best Selenium Alternatives (Free and Paid) in 2021
Screenster is an automation testing solution based on visual comparisons. It is a regression testing tool for websites and web applications, one of the alternatives to selenium. This UI testing automation cloud or self-hosted tool can be used without writing a single line of code. It helps non-technical users a lot in creating better tests.
Source: www.softwaretestingmaterial.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Mail Tester seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 95 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Mail Tester mentions (95)

  • Unable to send DSN messages from exchange 2019
    Ok I manage to have SPF working. Now I can check my spam score on mail-tester.com and I have 9.8. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Emails sent using Mailjet not being delivered to Gmail addresses that have the sending address whitelisted?
    I just started using Mailjet, and am having problems getting emails to deliver to Gmail addresses, even after the receiver has whitelisted the sending address. I've been using ChatGPT-4 to troubleshoot possible problems, and have addressed all of the obvious stuff. I used mail-tester.com and got a score of 9.8/10 for deliverability. So, I'm not looking for general advice on deliverability; I'm confident I've done... Source: over 1 year ago
  • 2023 - how use mail-tester.com with hubspot
    Hi guys, do you have any solution to use mail-tester.com in Hubspot nowadays? When I try to send a newsletter to a "mail-tester" email, hubspot asks me to verify the existence of the email before I can use it. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Most of E-mails sent to outlook.com addresses are not deliverd - help me understand why
    - I've checked mail-tester.com if our SPF-record is still good. It gave me a 9/10. - SPF, IP, HELO and rDNS lookups were good. - Checked for global spam lists, we don't seem to be on them. - I've rebooted the server. (hey, you never know) - We don't have DKIM or DMARC set up yet. Source: over 1 year ago
  • my welcome emails reach google's inbox but outlook's spam
    I am using emailoctopus to send welcome emails for new subscribers of a landing page I have with a waiting list. At last I accomplished to make the emails reach Gmail inboxes, nevertheless the emails still are reaching spam in Hotmail/outlook, I don't know why. I have a 9.5 in mail-tester.com and the problem it tells me it is some broken email from the emailoctopus template , I share an image of it. Source: almost 2 years ago
View more

Screenster mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Screenster yet. Tracking of Screenster recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Mail Tester and Screenster, you can also consider the following products

CrossBrowserTesting - Browser Testing made simple! Run automated, visual, and manual tests on 1500+ real browsers and mobile devices. Test more browsers, in less time.

Browsershots - Browsershots makes screenshots of your web design in different browsers.

Sauce Labs - Test mobile or web apps instantly across 700+ browser/OS/device platform combinations - without infrastructure setup.

browserling - Live interactive cross-browser testing from your browser.

Selenium - Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that.

Litmus - litmus tests and tracks your email campaigns, so you can always put your best design forward.

Loading...