Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

M-Files VS Structr

Compare M-Files VS Structr and see what are their differences

M-Files logo M-Files

M-Files is an enterprise information management system that helps users with organizing and managing documents.

Structr logo Structr

Open-source data CMS platform.
  • M-Files Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-07-02
  • Structr Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-12-27

M-Files features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    M-Files offers an intuitive and easy-to-navigate interface, which can reduce the learning curve and enhance user productivity.
  • Advanced Search Functionality
    The system provides powerful search capabilities that allow users to find documents quickly via metadata, keywords, or full-text search.
  • Metadata-Driven Architecture
    M-Files uses a metadata-driven approach, making it easier to categorize, locate, and manage documents based on their properties rather than their physical location in a folder.
  • Compatibility
    It supports integration with numerous business applications such as Microsoft Office, Salesforce, and SharePoint, which enhances its flexibility and adaptability within different IT environments.
  • Automation and Workflow
    M-Files includes automation features for document processing and workflow management, helping organizations streamline their business processes.
  • Compliance and Security
    The platform offers robust security features and compliance tools to ensure that documents are managed in accordance with industry standards and regulations.

Possible disadvantages of M-Files

  • Cost
    M-Files can be pricey, particularly for small to medium-sized businesses, due to its licensing fees and potential additional costs for customization and integration.
  • Implementation Complexity
    The initial setup and customization of M-Files can be complex and time-consuming, often requiring expert support and a thorough understanding of the organization's needs.
  • Performance
    Some users have reported performance issues, especially when dealing with large volumes of documents or complex searches, which can affect productivity.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While the basic interface is user-friendly, mastering advanced features and customization options can require significant training and technical expertise.
  • Mobile Experience
    The mobile version of M-Files, although functional, may not offer the same seamless experience as the desktop version, which can be a drawback for on-the-go users.
  • Search Configuration
    Although the search functionality is advanced, configuring it to meet specific organizational needs can be complicated and may require professional assistance.

Structr features and specs

  • Full-Stack Solution
    Structr offers a cohesive full-stack solution, combining back-end and front-end capabilities into one package, which can simplify development and maintenance.
  • Graph Database Integration
    Structr is built on top of Neo4j, a leading graph database, allowing users to leverage graph data models and operations effectively.
  • Rapid Development
    With its low-code environment, Structr enables faster application development and prototyping, reducing time-to-market.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The platform provides a user-friendly interface that helps both developers and non-developers to design and manage applications without deep technical knowledge.
  • Flexibility
    Structr's customizable architecture supports diverse use cases and can be tailored to fit specific project requirements.

Possible disadvantages of Structr

  • Learning Curve
    While Structr offers extensive features, new users might face a significant learning curve before mastering its full potential.
  • Limited Community Support
    Compared to other development platforms, Structr has a smaller community, potentially leading to less community-based support and fewer third-party resources.
  • Dependency on Neo4j
    As Structr heavily relies on Neo4j, users must also have an understanding of Neo4j, which may require extra learning and adaptation.
  • Performance Constraints
    For very large and complex data sets, performance might be a concern, as graph databases like Neo4j can have limitations compared to traditional databases in certain scenarios.
  • Cost
    While there might be open-source components, additional features or enterprise-level solutions in Structr may involve licensing fees or additional costs.

M-Files videos

M-Files Overview Video

More videos:

  • Review - M-Files document management software for Administration introduction video
  • Review - M-Files Project Document Management

Structr videos

Short intro demo video of Structr (6:23)

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to M-Files and Structr)
Project Management
75 75%
25% 25
Office & Productivity
87 87%
13% 13
Document Collaboration
0 0%
100% 100
Document Automation
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using M-Files and Structr. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing M-Files and Structr, you can also consider the following products

IBM FileNet - Enterprise Content Management platform for large businesses

Acquia - Acquia is a commercial open-source software that provides products, services and technical support for the open source Drupal social publishing system.

Laserfiche - Laserfiche offers powerful document management software solutions that are easy to implement and easy to use.

Adobe Experience Manager - Adobe Experience Manager is a cross-platform CMS that works across websites, mobile apps and on-site displays.

DocuShare - Enterprise content management & process automation platform

Ideagen Easysite - Ideagen Easysite is secure, user-friendly and reliable web and enterprise content management system software.