LWN.net VS RegExr

I can't resist pointing out that LWN (https://lwn.net/) has been dedicated, for many years, to the production of operating-system information that is not terrible. Have a look, and perhaps consider joining us :). - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago

Honestly, you're probably best off just reading LWN: https://lwn.net/. They publish articles on bleeding-edge features of the kernel, often before they're even merged. The editors are highly technical, and excellent writers, who are able to explain technical concepts in a way that's often clearer than what you'll read in a textbook anyways. They also frequently get guest writers who are kernel contributors and/or... Source: about 1 year ago

I'm a fan of LWN.net's[0] business model. (Enough that it's the only news source I actually subscribe to). Links to external news articles are free for anyone to read, and for all account owners (paid or not) to comment on. Featured articles by LWN's paid contributors are available for paid subscribers to read and comment on immediately, and for everyone else to read and for unpaid account owners to comment on... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago

A subscription to LWN.net is most definitely worth it if you want to stay up to date with whatever is happening in the Linux world. Source: about 1 year ago

LWN : Weekly news coverage of opensource technologies, programming, etc. ( Originally Linux Weekly News). - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

When thinking about how I might compare an arrangement to the contiguous group of damaged springs, I used regexr.com to experiment with very specific regexs that used the numbers. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago

There are plenty of online regex tools to test and experiment with regex patterns. Some popular ones include RegExr, RegEx101, and RegexPlanet. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago

Using regexr.com it at least appears to work as expected. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago

If you are going to use RE's, use something like https://regexr.com/ to double check that they're doing what you want. I was suspicious of your 'cols = re.findall(r'\d+ .....', i)' line, and indeed it does miss some columns. You should rethink your column detection, and either not use REs or learn how to use capture groups and \w. There would then be no reason to use yet another RE in your column iterator to... Source: 5 months ago

First time posting here, let me know if I need to edit post to conform to any rules. My issue is that I'm trying to match regex pattern to separate out the number of cubes drawn and its color but my Matcher object seems to not be returning any matches so it's throwing a no match found exception when I try to call digitMatcher.group(). I have tested my regex pattern on sites like regexr and it seems to pass there... Source: 5 months ago