LOT Network VS Google Patents

I've seen an organization like this on HN in the past - but struggling to find the post. A quick search turned up https://lotnet.com/ which I think is it. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

P.S. Don't ignore freedom to operate ;) and check out https://lotnet.com/ too :). Source: about 2 years ago

Other companies can also lease the rights to use our patents. We are also a member of the LOTNetwork. https://lotnet.com/ as well. Source: over 2 years ago

Http://lotnet.com and search Membership. ** LOTNET is a group of about 700 corporations world wide that have Intellectual Property patents that combined forces to sue ANYONE making infringements on it's IP Microsoft Google IBM Walmart General Motors Mercedes-Benz BMW and yes ISI BLOCKCHAIN DEVELOPMENT LABS $Share Coin IS on the list as of AUGUST 2021. Source: over 2 years ago

First, for those who think CEO George P isn't vocal enough, is a fraud trying to "pump and dump" or don't think he's not doing what he can to prevent this travis-sham-mockery, you're sadly mistaken. He has a PHD with 100 patents stored at the Lot Network , the last thing to be believed is George P is just coming up with 💩 as we go. This plan has been in place well before the talks with TRCH and he doesn't play to... Source: almost 3 years ago

> they deliberately didn't patent it If you'll check the historical record you'll find, for example, patents US2524035A (Bardeen&Brattain, Three-electrode circuit element utilizing semiconductive materials, oldest priority 1948-02-26) and US2569347A (Shockley, Circuit element utilizing semiconductive material, oldest priority 1948-06-26). > How 'bout the amplifiers on the optical fibers? patents.google.com... - Source: Hacker News / 26 days ago

I don't have that hope with past "due diligence" track records. Performing a quick peek for the author at Google Patents I only see mentions of his involvement with neural networks in past work [1]. I am not an expert in patents but I assume that they will apply there and/or publish papers before the company is launched. Except if the breakthrough is not there or it is really revolutionary but statistics are not... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago

Yeah. Last I'd heard (2018?) they were trying to get into the 3d printing business, but since their main site doesn't say anything to that note I have to believe it's not going too well. https://patents.google.com/?assignee=Xerox+Corporation&sort=new. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago

Its actually a hard problem: the massive boom that's required to provide reach is inherently quite unstable, not in the mm or cm but we're talking decimeters here. Some of the core tech of FBR dating back ~15 yrs addresses this kind of dynamic stabilization. FBR is impressive and they've built decent an IP. [1] https://patents.google.com/?inventor=Mark+Joseph+Pivac. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago

The process of analysing some of the patents is quite tedious I have to admit. Google Patents (https://patents.google.com/) is great and all, but it's not fun to browse patents. So far I haven't found a better way of doing this. If you are interested in just the gist of some of these patents you are welcome to read my notes daily on them here: https://100yearpatents.com. Source: 7 months ago