Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

locust VS QA Wizard Pro

Compare locust VS QA Wizard Pro and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

locust logo locust

An open source load testing tool written in Python.

QA Wizard Pro logo QA Wizard Pro

Automated functional, stress, and load testing.
  • locust Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-11
  • QA Wizard Pro Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-15

locust features and specs

  • Scalability
    Locust is designed to distribute the load tests across multiple machines, allowing for high scalability and the ability to simulate millions of users.
  • Python-based
    The tool is written in Python, which makes it highly flexible and suitable for those who are familiar with the language. You can write custom test scenarios easily.
  • Web-based UI
    Locust provides a user-friendly web-based interface that makes it easy to monitor and control the test execution in real-time.
  • Real-time monitoring
    During test execution, you get real-time statistics and charts that help in monitoring the performance and load.
  • Open-source
    Being an open-source tool, Locust allows for community contributions and is free to use, which helps in continuous improvement and support from the user base.

Possible disadvantages of locust

  • Setup Complexity
    Initial setup can be somewhat complex, especially for large scale or distributed tests. Requires experience with Python and potentially other infrastructure setups.
  • Resource Intensive
    Locust can be resource-intensive, requiring significant compute resources, particularly when simulating large numbers of users.
  • Steeper Learning Curve
    Despite its flexibility, the requirement to write test scenarios in Python may present a learning curve for users not familiar with programming.
  • Limited Protocol Support
    Primarily designed for HTTP/HTTPS protocols, Locust might not be suitable for load testing applications that use other protocols without additional customization.
  • Dependence on External Libraries
    While the use of Python offers flexibility, it also means that you might need to rely on external libraries and tools, which can introduce dependency management issues.

QA Wizard Pro features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

locust videos

Locust review - GTA Online guides

More videos:

  • Review - GTA Online: Ocelot Locust Review
  • Review - GTA 5 - DLC Vehicle Customization - Ocelot Locust and Review

QA Wizard Pro videos

No QA Wizard Pro videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to locust and QA Wizard Pro)
Monitoring Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Automated Testing
0 0%
100% 100
Website Testing
86 86%
14% 14
Analytics
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using locust and QA Wizard Pro. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, locust seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 61 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

locust mentions (61)

  • 3 Types of Chaos Experiments and How To Run Them
    Use load testing tools like JMeter, Gatling, or Locust to simulate demand spikes and verify that your auto-scaling rules work as expected. This will ensure that your system can handle real-world traffic patterns. - Source: dev.to / 23 days ago
  • Outgrowing Postgres: How to identify scale problems
    Use load testing tools like Apache JMeter, Gatling, or Locust to measure your application's throughput under various loads and compare it to historical data. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Five Advanced Techniques to Improve Automated Testing by 50%
    You should also incorporate performance testing into your daily builds to catch performance regressions early. For this, you can use Locust for load testing. You can also implement performance budgets in your CI/CD pipeline. This will allow you to fail builds that don't meet performance criteria, ensuring performance doesn't degrade over time. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Why your FastAPI (or Flask) App performs poorly with high loads
    These tests were done on GCP Cloud Run using a single processor, and 512M RAM machine, and we used Locust, an incredible tool (for Python, LoL). - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • How MySQL Tuning Can Dramatically Improve WordPress Performance
    Our test duration was 2 days. To handle this longer testing period, we switched from BlazeMeter (max test duration of 20 minutes) to Locust, an open-source load-testing tool. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
View more

QA Wizard Pro mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of QA Wizard Pro yet. Tracking of QA Wizard Pro recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing locust and QA Wizard Pro, you can also consider the following products

Apache JMeter - Apache JMeter™.

Ranorex Studio - Accelerate testing with Ranorex Studio, the all-in-one tool for test automation. For desktop, web, or mobile app testing, with easy codeless automation tools, a full IDE, robust object recognition, flexible reporting and built-in Selenium WebDriver.

Loader.io - Loader.io is a simple cloud-based load testing service

Selenium - Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that.

gatling.io - Gatling is an open-source load testing framework based on Scala, Akka and Netty

Ranorex - Ranorex is a GUI test automation framework for testing of desktop, web-based and mobile applications.