Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

locust VS PhearJS

Compare locust VS PhearJS and see what are their differences

LiveSession
LiveSession helps you analyze users’ behavior, improve UX, find JS bugs, and increase conversion rates using session replays, and event-based product analytics. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

locust logo locust

An open source load testing tool written in Python.

PhearJS logo PhearJS

Render any dynamic Javascript webpage to JSON with PhantomJS.
  • locust Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-11
  • PhearJS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-10-17

locust features and specs

  • Scalability
    Locust is designed to distribute the load tests across multiple machines, allowing for high scalability and the ability to simulate millions of users.
  • Python-based
    The tool is written in Python, which makes it highly flexible and suitable for those who are familiar with the language. You can write custom test scenarios easily.
  • Web-based UI
    Locust provides a user-friendly web-based interface that makes it easy to monitor and control the test execution in real-time.
  • Real-time monitoring
    During test execution, you get real-time statistics and charts that help in monitoring the performance and load.
  • Open-source
    Being an open-source tool, Locust allows for community contributions and is free to use, which helps in continuous improvement and support from the user base.

Possible disadvantages of locust

  • Setup Complexity
    Initial setup can be somewhat complex, especially for large scale or distributed tests. Requires experience with Python and potentially other infrastructure setups.
  • Resource Intensive
    Locust can be resource-intensive, requiring significant compute resources, particularly when simulating large numbers of users.
  • Steeper Learning Curve
    Despite its flexibility, the requirement to write test scenarios in Python may present a learning curve for users not familiar with programming.
  • Limited Protocol Support
    Primarily designed for HTTP/HTTPS protocols, Locust might not be suitable for load testing applications that use other protocols without additional customization.
  • Dependence on External Libraries
    While the use of Python offers flexibility, it also means that you might need to rely on external libraries and tools, which can introduce dependency management issues.

PhearJS features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    PhearJS provides an easy-to-use interface for web scraping, making it accessible to developers with varying levels of expertise.
  • JavaScript Rendering
    It can render JavaScript-heavy websites, which allows it to scrape modern sites that rely heavily on client-side scripting.
  • Proxy Support
    PhearJS supports the use of proxies, which can help in bypassing rate limits and accessing geo-restricted content.
  • Customizable
    The platform allows for customization in the scraping process, offering flexibility to users in handling various web scraping requirements.

Possible disadvantages of PhearJS

  • Limited Control
    While PhearJS is easy to use, the abstraction may limit control over some advanced settings compared to more code-intensive solutions.
  • Dependency on Phear.io
    Relying on a third-party service means users are dependent on the availability and reliability of Phear.io’s infrastructure.
  • Potential Cost
    Depending on usage, the cost of using PhearJS can add up, especially for large-scale scraping operations.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    Although it is generally easy to use, mastering advanced features may require time and experience.

locust videos

+ Add

Locust review - GTA Online guides

More videos:

  • Review - GTA Online: Ocelot Locust Review
  • Review - GTA 5 - DLC Vehicle Customization - Ocelot Locust and Review

PhearJS videos

No PhearJS videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to locust and PhearJS)

locust

PhearJS

Monitoring Tools
100 100%
Monitoring Tools
0% 0
Browser Testing
0 0%
Browser Testing
100% 100
Website Testing
86 86%
Website Testing
14% 14
Automated Testing
0 0%
Automated Testing
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using locust and PhearJS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, locust seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 61 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

locust mentions (61)

  • 3 Types of Chaos Experiments and How To Run Them
    Use load testing tools like JMeter, Gatling, or Locust to simulate demand spikes and verify that your auto-scaling rules work as expected. This will ensure that your system can handle real-world traffic patterns. - Source: dev.to / 26 days ago
  • Outgrowing Postgres: How to identify scale problems
    Use load testing tools like Apache JMeter, Gatling, or Locust to measure your application's throughput under various loads and compare it to historical data. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Five Advanced Techniques to Improve Automated Testing by 50%
    You should also incorporate performance testing into your daily builds to catch performance regressions early. For this, you can use Locust for load testing. You can also implement performance budgets in your CI/CD pipeline. This will allow you to fail builds that don't meet performance criteria, ensuring performance doesn't degrade over time. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • Why your FastAPI (or Flask) App performs poorly with high loads
    These tests were done on GCP Cloud Run using a single processor, and 512M RAM machine, and we used Locust, an incredible tool (for Python, LoL). - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • How MySQL Tuning Can Dramatically Improve WordPress Performance
    Our test duration was 2 days. To handle this longer testing period, we switched from BlazeMeter (max test duration of 20 minutes) to Locust, an open-source load-testing tool. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
View more

PhearJS mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of PhearJS yet. Tracking of PhearJS recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing locust and PhearJS, you can also consider the following products

Apache JMeter - Apache JMeter™.

Selenium - Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that.

Loader.io - Loader.io is a simple cloud-based load testing service

Robot framework - Robot Framework is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance...

gatling.io - Gatling is an open-source load testing framework based on Scala, Akka and Netty

Screenster - 10x faster UI testing without a line of code.

Loading...