Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

locust VS Codeship

Compare locust VS Codeship and see what are their differences

LiveSession
LiveSession helps you analyze users’ behavior, improve UX, find JS bugs, and increase conversion rates using session replays, and event-based product analytics. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

locust logo locust

An open source load testing tool written in Python.

Codeship logo Codeship

Codeship is a fast and secure hosted Continuous Delivery platform that scales with your needs.
  • locust Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-11
  • Codeship Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-19

locust features and specs

  • Scalability
    Locust is designed to distribute the load tests across multiple machines, allowing for high scalability and the ability to simulate millions of users.
  • Python-based
    The tool is written in Python, which makes it highly flexible and suitable for those who are familiar with the language. You can write custom test scenarios easily.
  • Web-based UI
    Locust provides a user-friendly web-based interface that makes it easy to monitor and control the test execution in real-time.
  • Real-time monitoring
    During test execution, you get real-time statistics and charts that help in monitoring the performance and load.
  • Open-source
    Being an open-source tool, Locust allows for community contributions and is free to use, which helps in continuous improvement and support from the user base.

Possible disadvantages of locust

  • Setup Complexity
    Initial setup can be somewhat complex, especially for large scale or distributed tests. Requires experience with Python and potentially other infrastructure setups.
  • Resource Intensive
    Locust can be resource-intensive, requiring significant compute resources, particularly when simulating large numbers of users.
  • Steeper Learning Curve
    Despite its flexibility, the requirement to write test scenarios in Python may present a learning curve for users not familiar with programming.
  • Limited Protocol Support
    Primarily designed for HTTP/HTTPS protocols, Locust might not be suitable for load testing applications that use other protocols without additional customization.
  • Dependence on External Libraries
    While the use of Python offers flexibility, it also means that you might need to rely on external libraries and tools, which can introduce dependency management issues.

Codeship features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Codeship offers an intuitive interface that simplifies the setup process, making it accessible for developers who may not be experienced with continuous integration (CI) and continuous deployment (CD) tools.
  • Integration with Cloud Services
    Codeship integrates seamlessly with cloud services such as AWS, Google Cloud, and Heroku, facilitating easy deployment of applications.
  • Flexible Workflows
    The tool provides support for both Codeship Basic and Codeship Pro, allowing for flexibility in choosing between a more straightforward or a more customizable CI/CD workflow.
  • Docker Support
    Codeship Pro offers extensive support for Docker, allowing developers to use containerization strategies for their build and deployment processes.
  • Parallel Test Pipelines
    It supports parallel test pipelines, which can significantly speed up the testing process and reduce build times.
  • Slack Integration
    Codeship integrates with communication tools like Slack, enabling notifications and updates directly within team communication channels.

Possible disadvantages of Codeship

  • Cost
    Codeship can be more expensive compared to other CI/CD tools, particularly for larger teams or more complex projects that require more build resources.
  • Limited Customization
    For highly customized CI/CD processes, Codeship Basic might be limiting. Users may need to switch to Codeship Pro, which requires more configuration and a steeper learning curve.
  • Performance Bottlenecks
    Users have reported occasional performance bottlenecks, particularly under heavy workloads, which can slow down the CI/CD pipeline.
  • Plugin Ecosystem
    The plugin ecosystem for Codeship is not as extensive as some other CI/CD tools like Jenkins, potentially limiting its integration capabilities.
  • Learning Curve
    While Codeship Basic is relatively easy to use, Codeship Pro has a steeper learning curve, particularly for users who are new to Docker and advanced CI/CD practices.
  • Support
    Although support is available, some users have reported slower response times and less comprehensive support compared to other CI/CD platforms.

locust videos

+ Add

Locust review - GTA Online guides

More videos:

  • Review - GTA Online: Ocelot Locust Review
  • Review - GTA 5 - DLC Vehicle Customization - Ocelot Locust and Review

Codeship videos

+ Add

LinuxFest Northwest 2017: Continuous Delivery to Microsoft Azure with Docker through Codeship

More videos:

  • Review - The Codeship -- Continuous Deployment made simple

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to locust and Codeship)

locust

Codeship

Monitoring Tools
100 100%
Monitoring Tools
0% 0
Continuous Integration
0 0%
Continuous Integration
100% 100
Website Testing
100 100%
Website Testing
0% 0
DevOps Tools
0 0%
DevOps Tools
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using locust and Codeship. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare locust and Codeship

locust Reviews

We have no reviews of locust yet.
Be the first one to post

Codeship Reviews

The Best Alternatives to Jenkins for Developers
Codeship, a CI/CD platform based in the cloud, has an interface that is easy for users and it can integrate with numerous tools and services people are familiar with. It works well for different programming languages and platforms, which makes it suitable for many teams involved in development work.
Source: morninglif.com
Top 10 Most Popular Jenkins Alternatives for DevOps in 2024
CodeShip is a CloudBees SaaS platform that provides a managed CI/CD experience in the cloud. It’s designed to give control back to developers by providing a guided workflow for creating and maintaining CI/CD pipelines. This avoids much of the complexity that’s associated with Jenkins.
Source: spacelift.io
10 Jenkins Alternatives in 2021 for Developers
You could consider using CodeShip to help you to optimize CI/CD cloud deployment. CodeShip can be used by just about any type of development team that looks to increase the efficiency and automation of their code delivery. You can get started within minutes and gain access to an incredible amount of control when setting everything up. The customization options will seem...
Source: solutionsuggest.com
The Best Alternatives to Jenkins for Developers
CodeShip is a hosted continuous integration and continuous delivery platform found by CloudBees. It provides fast feedback and customized environments to build applications. It provides integration with almost anything and is good at helping you scale as per your needs. It comes free for up to 100 monthly builds.
Source: www.lambdatest.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, locust seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 61 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

locust mentions (61)

  • 3 Types of Chaos Experiments and How To Run Them
    Use load testing tools like JMeter, Gatling, or Locust to simulate demand spikes and verify that your auto-scaling rules work as expected. This will ensure that your system can handle real-world traffic patterns. - Source: dev.to / 30 days ago
  • Outgrowing Postgres: How to identify scale problems
    Use load testing tools like Apache JMeter, Gatling, or Locust to measure your application's throughput under various loads and compare it to historical data. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Five Advanced Techniques to Improve Automated Testing by 50%
    You should also incorporate performance testing into your daily builds to catch performance regressions early. For this, you can use Locust for load testing. You can also implement performance budgets in your CI/CD pipeline. This will allow you to fail builds that don't meet performance criteria, ensuring performance doesn't degrade over time. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • Why your FastAPI (or Flask) App performs poorly with high loads
    These tests were done on GCP Cloud Run using a single processor, and 512M RAM machine, and we used Locust, an incredible tool (for Python, LoL). - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • How MySQL Tuning Can Dramatically Improve WordPress Performance
    Our test duration was 2 days. To handle this longer testing period, we switched from BlazeMeter (max test duration of 20 minutes) to Locust, an open-source load-testing tool. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
View more

Codeship mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Codeship yet. Tracking of Codeship recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing locust and Codeship, you can also consider the following products

Apache JMeter - Apache JMeter™.

Jenkins - Jenkins is an open-source continuous integration server with 300+ plugins to support all kinds of software development

Loader.io - Loader.io is a simple cloud-based load testing service

CircleCI - CircleCI gives web developers powerful Continuous Integration and Deployment with easy setup and maintenance.

gatling.io - Gatling is an open-source load testing framework based on Scala, Akka and Netty

Travis CI - Simple, flexible, trustworthy CI/CD tools. Join hundreds of thousands who define tests and deployments in minutes, then scale up simply with parallel or multi-environment builds using Travis CI’s precision syntax—all with the developer in mind.

Loading...