Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

localhost.run VS Openport

Compare localhost.run VS Openport and see what are their differences

ESET PROTECT Advanced
Best-in-class endpoint protection against ransomware & zero-day threats, backed by powerful data security featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

localhost.run logo localhost.run

Instantly share your localhost environment!

Openport logo Openport

Openport is an easy and secure reverse SSH.
  • localhost.run Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-24
  • Openport Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-25

localhost.run features and specs

  • Simplicity
    Localhost.run provides a simple way to expose your local server to the internet without requiring complex configurations or additional software installations.
  • No Installation Required
    You can use localhost.run directly from your terminal without the need to install any software or dependencies.
  • Free and Instantaneous
    Localhost.run offers a free service, and you can quickly start tunneling without any wait times or sign-ups.
  • Wide Compatibility
    It works with any web server running on your local machine, making it highly versatile.

Possible disadvantages of localhost.run

  • Stability and Uptime
    As a free service, localhost.run may not be as reliable as paid alternatives, potentially leading to unexpected downtimes.
  • Limited Customization
    Localhost.run doesn't offer many advanced features or customizations, which may be a drawback for more complex use cases.
  • Security
    By exposing your local server to the internet, there could be potential security risks if your server is not properly configured or secured.
  • Performance
    The performance of the tunnel can be slower compared to running the server locally due to additional network hops and bandwidth limitations.

Openport features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Openport offers a user-friendly interface that makes it simple for users to set up and manage their network connections without requiring extensive networking knowledge.
  • Secure Connections
    The platform ensures that data sent through its network is encrypted, providing secure connections that protect user data from potential breaches.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    Openport is compatible with multiple operating systems, including Windows, macOS, and Linux, making it a versatile choice for users with different OS requirements.
  • Community Support
    Being an open-source project, Openport has a community of developers and users who contribute to its development and provide support.

Possible disadvantages of Openport

  • Limited Features
    Compared to some commercial VPN services, Openport might offer fewer features and customization options for advanced users.
  • Reliance on User's Technical Skill
    While the interface is user-friendly, setting up advanced configurations may still require some technical knowledge, which could be a barrier for non-technical users.
  • Lack of Dedicated Customer Support
    As an open-source tool, Openport may not offer the same level of dedicated customer support as commercial alternatives.
  • Potential Security Risks
    Being open-source can be a double-edged sword, as it might be susceptible to overlooked vulnerabilities unless regularly updated and monitored by the community.

Analysis of localhost.run

Overall verdict

  • Localhost.run is a good tool for developers who need a fast, efficient, and secure way to share their local development environments. Its ease of use and minimal setup make it an excellent choice for quick sharing and testing scenarios.

Why this product is good

  • Localhost.run is a service that provides a quick and easy way to expose a local server to the internet. It is often praised for its simplicity, ease of use, and minimal setup requirements. It allows developers to share their work quickly for collaboration, testing, or demonstration purposes without needing to deploy to a public server. It uses a secure SSH tunnel, which adds a layer of security to the service.

Recommended for

  • Developers who need to demo their work to clients or teams
  • Collaborative programming and real-time feedback
  • Testing webhooks or APIs from an external source
  • Temporary exposure of local servers for testing purposes

localhost.run videos

No localhost.run videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Openport videos

+ Add

OpenPort BlockChain Solution ICO REVIEW

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to localhost.run and Openport)

localhost.run

Openport

Localhost Tools
88 88%
Localhost Tools
12% 12
Testing
86 86%
Testing
14% 14
Webhooks
90 90%
Webhooks
10% 10
Tunnel
100 100%
Tunnel
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using localhost.run and Openport. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare localhost.run and Openport

localhost.run Reviews

Tunnelling services for exposing localhost to the web
localhost.run is very similar to Serveo but with less features. In fact, as far as I can tell, it only does 1 thing: expose your local web server to the web with a public URL. And it does that well enough for me.
Source: chenhuijing.com

Openport Reviews

We have no reviews of Openport yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, localhost.run seems to be a lot more popular than Openport. While we know about 42 links to localhost.run, we've tracked only 1 mention of Openport. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

localhost.run mentions (42)

View more

Openport mentions (1)

  • An Idea for accessing SSH remotely through a proxy service.
    Google “Reverse ssh service” or something along those lines. For example https://openport.io/ is one such service that allows SSH to a host behind a firewall. Some are even free. Source: almost 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing localhost.run and Openport, you can also consider the following products

ngrok - ngrok enables secure introspectable tunnels to localhost webhook development tool and debugging tool.

Portmap.io - Expose your local PC to Internet from behind firewall and without real IP address

sish - An open source serveo/ngrok alternative. HTTP(S)/WS(S)/TCP Tunnels to localhost using only SSH.

Packetriot - Serve Web Apps. Connect to Hosts & Devices.

Pagekite - Bring your localhost servers on-line.

LocalXpose - Bye Bye Localhost, Hello World!

Loading...