Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

localhost.run VS AUTAPF

Compare localhost.run VS AUTAPF and see what are their differences

Hyperview
DCIM software reinvented. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

localhost.run logo localhost.run

Instantly share your localhost environment!

AUTAPF logo AUTAPF

Reliable TCP and UDP port forwarding for Windows.
  • localhost.run Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-24
  • AUTAPF Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-05

localhost.run features and specs

  • Simplicity
    Localhost.run provides a simple way to expose your local server to the internet without requiring complex configurations or additional software installations.
  • No Installation Required
    You can use localhost.run directly from your terminal without the need to install any software or dependencies.
  • Free and Instantaneous
    Localhost.run offers a free service, and you can quickly start tunneling without any wait times or sign-ups.
  • Wide Compatibility
    It works with any web server running on your local machine, making it highly versatile.

Possible disadvantages of localhost.run

  • Stability and Uptime
    As a free service, localhost.run may not be as reliable as paid alternatives, potentially leading to unexpected downtimes.
  • Limited Customization
    Localhost.run doesn't offer many advanced features or customizations, which may be a drawback for more complex use cases.
  • Security
    By exposing your local server to the internet, there could be potential security risks if your server is not properly configured or secured.
  • Performance
    The performance of the tunnel can be slower compared to running the server locally due to additional network hops and bandwidth limitations.

AUTAPF features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    AUTAPF has a user-friendly interface that makes it easy to set up and manage port forwarding rules without requiring advanced networking knowledge.
  • Logging and Notifications
    The software offers detailed logging and email notifications, allowing users to monitor network activity and receive alerts on important events.
  • Rule Scheduling
    AUTAPF includes the ability to schedule port forwarding rules, which helps in automating changes based on time-specific requirements.
  • Port Range Forwarding
    Supports forwarding of entire ranges of ports, making it versatile for applications that require multiple ports.
  • Support for Multiple Protocols
    The application supports both TCP and UDP protocols, providing flexibility for various types of internet applications.

Possible disadvantages of AUTAPF

  • Cost
    AUTAPF is a paid software, which might not be ideal for users looking for free alternatives.
  • Platform Limitation
    The software is only available for Windows, limiting its use for those who operate on other operating systems.
  • Resource Intensive
    Some users may find that the application uses more system resources than necessary, impacting the performance of other processes.
  • Basic Support
    The level of customer support and available documentation might not be as comprehensive as some enterprise solutions.
  • Lack of Advanced Features
    AUTAPF may not offer some of the advanced features that power users or larger networks might require, such as integrated VPN or advanced security options.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to localhost.run and AUTAPF)

localhost.run

AUTAPF

Localhost Tools
100 100%
Localhost Tools
0% 0
Monitoring Tools
0 0%
Monitoring Tools
100% 100
Testing
100 100%
Testing
0% 0
Productivity
0 0%
Productivity
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using localhost.run and AUTAPF. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare localhost.run and AUTAPF

localhost.run Reviews

Tunnelling services for exposing localhost to the web
localhost.run is very similar to Serveo but with less features. In fact, as far as I can tell, it only does 1 thing: expose your local web server to the web with a public URL. And it does that well enough for me.
Source: chenhuijing.com

AUTAPF Reviews

We have no reviews of AUTAPF yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, localhost.run seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 42 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

localhost.run mentions (42)

View more

AUTAPF mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of AUTAPF yet. Tracking of AUTAPF recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing localhost.run and AUTAPF, you can also consider the following products

ngrok - ngrok enables secure introspectable tunnels to localhost webhook development tool and debugging tool.

PortMapper - Do you need to map a specific TCP or UDP port on your machine to another port on another machine?

Portmap.io - Expose your local PC to Internet from behind firewall and without real IP address

PFConfig - PortForward's PFConfig Software lets you forward ports on any router for any program.

sish - An open source serveo/ngrok alternative. HTTP(S)/WS(S)/TCP Tunnels to localhost using only SSH.

Port Map - TheCodingMonkeys, authors of software like SubEthaEdit.

Loading...