localepurge VS pacman (package manager)

localepurge

This is a script to recover disk space wasted for unneeded locales, Gnome/KDE localizations and...

pacman (package manager)

The pacman package manager is one of the major distinguishing features of ...

Landing page //
2023-09-10

Landing page //
2022-01-07

localepurge

Website: packages.qa.debian.org

Edit details

pacman (package manager)

Website: wiki.archlinux.org

Edit details

localepurge features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

pacman (package manager) features and specs

Speed
Pacman is known for its fast performance in handling package operations such as installation, updates, and removal.
Dependency Resolution
Pacman handles dependencies automatically, ensuring that all required libraries and software are installed and up to date.
Simple Syntax
It features a straightforward and easy-to-remember syntax for commands, making it user-friendly for both new and experienced users.
Rolling Release Model
Pacman supports Arch Linux's rolling release model, providing users with the latest software versions without needing to upgrade to a new OS version.
AUR Support
Pacman works well with the Arch User Repository (AUR) through tools like `yay` or `aurman`, giving users access to a vast collection of community-maintained packages.
Customizability
The package manager is highly customizable, allowing users to configure it according to their preferences and needs.

Possible disadvantages of pacman (package manager)

Steep Learning Curve
New users might find Pacman difficult to use initially, especially if they are not familiar with command-line interfaces.
Less Handholding
Unlike some other package managers, Pacman assumes a certain level of knowledge about the system, which can be daunting for beginners.
Manual Interventions
Occasionally, updates might require manual interventions, which can be complex and require a good understanding of the underlying system.
No Graphical Interface
Pacman lacks an official graphical user interface (GUI), which some users may find inconvenient.
Limited Official Repositories
Although AUR provides an extensive range of packages, the official repositories are not as vast compared to some other distributions, potentially requiring users to rely on community packages.

Analysis of pacman (package manager)

Overall verdict

Yes, Pacman is considered a very good package manager, particularly for users who value a minimalist and efficient tool in managing software packages on a Linux system. Its speed, simplicity, and reliability make it a preferred choice for many Arch Linux users.

Why this product is good

Pacman is the default package manager for Arch Linux and its derivatives. It is renowned for its simplicity and speed in package management, offering a clear and concise command syntax. Pacman efficiently handles package updates, installations, and removals, keeping the system up to date with the latest software. Additionally, it has robust dependency management, ensuring all required dependencies are handled automatically during installations.

Recommended for

Pacman is especially recommended for those who use Arch Linux or its derivatives, like EndeavourOS and Manjaro, as well as users who appreciate a hands-on approach to Linux and enjoy customizing their environment. It's well-suited for advanced Linux users who want more control over their system.

localepurge videos

+ Add

Lubuntu Screencast: Localepurge helps you to gain more harddisk space

pacman (package manager) videos

No pacman (package manager) videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to localepurge and pacman (package manager))

localepurge

pacman (package manager)

Windows Tools

18 18%

Windows Tools

82% 82

Front End Package Manager

14 14%

Front End Package Manager

86% 86

Package Manager

15 15%

Package Manager

85% 85

Terminal Tools

100 100%

Terminal Tools

0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using localepurge and pacman (package manager). For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, pacman (package manager) seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 39 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

localepurge mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of localepurge yet. Tracking of localepurge recommendations started around Mar 2021.

pacman (package manager) mentions (39)

Been thinking of switching to linux but I am a noob
However, that "pacman -S" command has lots of switches (see section 1.1.1 ==> https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/pacman ). Source: over 1 year ago
How to build Software as a Service (SaaS) Notes application with mySQL/MariaDB and Apache in 300 lines of code
Install Vely - you can use standard packaging tools such as apt, dnf, pacman or zypper. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
Project on GitHub - Customizable Arch Linux Podman images based on the official Arch Linux Docker image
Automatic installation of packages during building utilizes pacman and aurman with the supported "package sources" being:. Source: almost 2 years ago
A response to the Fedora 40 Privacy-Preserving Telemetry Proposal
* Package management and DNF syntax usage are big topics. Follow the Arch Wiki example for the "pacman" package management tool ==> https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/pacman. Source: almost 2 years ago
Could someone make a Decky plugin that automates installing common dependencies?
Should be possible as the Arch distro SteamOS is built on includes pacman. Source: almost 2 years ago