Lobster VS B4X

Compare Lobster VS B4X and see what are their differences

LibHunt

LibHunt tracks mentions of software libraries on relevant social networks. Based on that data, you can find the most popular projects and their alternatives. featured

Contents:

» Base Details
» Videos
» Reviews
» Alternatives

B4X

Cross platform development tools for native iOS, Android, desktop and server applications.

Landing page //
2021-09-19

Landing page //
2021-10-17

The Lobster - Official Movie Review

B4X videos

+ Add

Little Bear B4X: A Short Sound Review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Lobster and B4X)

B4X

Game Engine

100 100%

Game Engine

0% 0

IDE

0 0%

IDE

100% 100

Game Development

100 100%

Game Development

0% 0

Development Tools

0 0%

Development Tools

100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Lobster and B4X. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Lobster and B4X

Lobster Reviews

We have no reviews of Lobster yet.
Be the first one to post

B4X Reviews

10 Best Android Studio Alternatives For App Development

B4X is a suite of rapid application development IDE’s. This platform allows you to create applications on the following platforms: Google’s Android, Apple’s iOS, Java, Raspberry Pi, and Arduino. B4X is a popular tool for Android app development. It is not only used by developers, but popular companies are also using this amazing tool like IBM, NASA, and others.

Source: techdator.net

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Lobster seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 21 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Lobster mentions (21)

The Neat Programming Language
I think lobster does this. "Compile time reference counting / lifetime analysis / borrow checker."[1] "Reference Counting with cycle detection at exit, 95% of reference count ops removed at compile time thanks to lifetime analysis."[1] [1] https://strlen.com/lobster/. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
What are some must have built-in modules in your opinion/experience?
I think the ability to open a window and do graphical stuff is actually pretty underrated in core language functionality. There's a few game-oriented programming languages like Lobster that put windowing and graphics in the core language functionality, and I think it's pretty neat. The biggest downside is that it's a lot to bite off, because you'll probably want to have standardized API functionality for a whole... Source: about 1 year ago
Why does Rust need humans to tell it how long a variable’s lifetime is?
There is another language, Lobster, that uses lifetime analysis like Rust, but IIUC infers lifetimes completely automatically. It looks like the idea is still experimental - I'm interested to see how it goes. Source: about 1 year ago
Plane - FOSS and self-hosted JIRA replacement. This new project has been useful for many folks, sharing it here too.
I'm keeping an eye on Lobster though. It fixes most of Python's problems. It's way faster, has proper static typing, the import system is sane, etc. Source: about 1 year ago
Using a borrow checker to track mutable refs in a GCed FP language?
Lobster (https://strlen.com/lobster/) appears to at least do lifetime analysis to reduce refcounting. I'm not sure about automatic interior mutability. I feel like there's a keyword here that can help find other compilers with similar features. Source: about 1 year ago