Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Listen VS Cowboy

Compare Listen VS Cowboy and see what are their differences

Listen logo Listen

A smart phone number

Cowboy logo Cowboy

Small, fast, modular HTTP server written in Erlang.
  • Listen Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-07-12
  • Cowboy Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-20

Listen videos

DID IT SUCK? - Doctor Who [Listen Review]

More videos:

  • Review - How I Listen to an Album
  • Review - LISTEN to MUSIC while you ride? | Freecom 4+ Review

Cowboy videos

COWBOY 3 REVIEW: Why I shipped my Cowboy 3 e-bike back.

More videos:

  • Review - COWBOY BIKE - Bad Bike from Belgium | E-BIKE REVIEW
  • Review - COWBOY, the electric bike TESLA or APPLE could have made: review
  • Review - COWBOY vs VELORETTI vs VANMOOF! Which bike should I chose?!?!
  • Review - NEW COWBOY REVIEW - Spin & Cash Generation Explained - TDS Badlands Update
  • Review - COWBOY 4 Review - Design E-Bike im großen Test

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Listen and Cowboy)
Communication
100 100%
0% 0
Web And Application Servers
VoIP
100 100%
0% 0
HTTP
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Listen and Cowboy. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Cowboy seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 5 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Listen mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Listen yet. Tracking of Listen recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Cowboy mentions (5)

  • Does the Heroku Ruby Stack use Log4j?
    According to the 'Server' response header, Cowboy is the customer facing web server Https://github.com/ninenines/cowboy. Source: over 2 years ago
  • How to create an Erlang rebar3 release derivation with dependencies?
    ===> sh(git clone -n https://github.com/ninenines/cowboy .tmp_dir636214859401) Failed with return code 128 and the following output: Cloning into '.tmp_dir636214859401'... Fatal: unable to access 'https://github.com/ninenines/cowboy/': SSL certificate problem: unable to get local issuer certificate. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Oh Erlang... where have you been all my life?
    RE: HTTP/Web Sockets/TCP/UDP/etc. - check out NineNines libraries: Ranch (TCP Socket Acceptor), Cowboy (HTTP Server), Gun (HTTP client), and CowLib (General HTTP/SPDY library) are pretty good from what I hear. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Build an Elixir Redis Server that's 100x faster than HTTP
    Ranch is a pretty well optimized and battle hardened tcp acceptor. It powers the Cowboy/Phoenix server which scales to extreme level of concurrency and low latency. Cowboy uses ranch to pool and accept connections and I believe it uses {active,once}. https://github.com/ninenines/cowboy https://github.com/ninenines/ranch. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • try-catch vs "let it crash"
    I have a web application which uses cowboy and cachex every so often cachex errors, which means my server returns a 500. Source: over 2 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Listen and Cowboy, you can also consider the following products

Ring4 - Manage business phone line as easily as you manage emails, in the cloud. Ring4 provide you with a business line and video conferencing solution.

Uber Bike - On-demand electric bikes for commuting and exploring

SpotMenu - Spotify and iTunes in your macOS menu bar

BikeSharing - Easily borrow a bike anywhere

OpenPhone - Simplest way to own a business phone number

Ikea Bekant Standing Desk - New motorized standing desk from Ikea