Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Linux Live Kit VS Distroshare Ubuntu Imager

Compare Linux Live Kit VS Distroshare Ubuntu Imager and see what are their differences

Linux Live Kit logo Linux Live Kit

Linux Live Kit the ultimate way to bring your linux to life. Create your own live distribution

Distroshare Ubuntu Imager logo Distroshare Ubuntu Imager

Remaster your Ubuntu install!
  • Linux Live Kit Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-15
  • Distroshare Ubuntu Imager Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-02

Linux Live Kit features and specs

  • Portability
    Linux Live Kit allows users to create a portable live Linux system from an existing installation, making it easy to transport and use on different machines without installing the OS.
  • Flexibility
    It provides the flexibility to customize the live distribution according to the user's preferences and requirements, offering a tailored environment.
  • Ease of Use
    The kit simplifies the process of creating a live CD or USB, making it accessible even for users with minimal technical experience.
  • Resource Efficiency
    As it runs from RAM, the system is typically quick and responsive, which can be beneficial for users with older hardware.
  • Recovery and Troubleshooting
    A live system can be an excellent tool for system recovery and troubleshooting, allowing users to boot a functional OS even if the main OS fails.

Possible disadvantages of Linux Live Kit

  • Customization Complexity
    While it offers flexibility, users looking to make significant customizations might face complexity that requires in-depth technical knowledge.
  • Hardware Compatibility
    Some hardware might not be fully supported out of the box, requiring users to manually configure drivers or kernels.
  • Limited Persistence
    Unless specifically configured, changes made in the live session are typically not saved after a reboot, limiting long-term use.
  • Performance Limitations
    While the system is generally responsive, running from a USB or optical drive can result in slower data access times compared to a fully installed OS.
  • Dependency Management
    Ensuring that all necessary dependencies are included in the live system can be challenging, potentially leading to missing libraries or applications.

Distroshare Ubuntu Imager features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Distroshare Ubuntu Imager simplifies the process of creating a custom live ISO from an existing Ubuntu installation, making it accessible even for users with limited technical expertise.
  • Customizability
    It allows users to customize their Ubuntu system before creating the ISO, which can include pre-installed applications and system settings, benefiting users with specific customization needs.
  • Open Source
    Being an open-source project on GitHub, it allows users to review, modify, and contribute to the codebase, fostering a transparent and community-driven development process.
  • Offline Backup and Deployment
    Facilitates the creation of an offline backup image of a customized system, which can be useful for quick deployment on multiple machines without requiring an internet connection.

Possible disadvantages of Distroshare Ubuntu Imager

  • Limited Documentation
    The project may not have comprehensive documentation, which can make it challenging for new users to understand advanced features or troubleshoot issues.
  • Ubuntu-Specific
    Designed specifically for Ubuntu, limiting its applicability for users wishing to create custom images for other Linux distributions.
  • Potential Compatibility Issues
    May encounter compatibility issues with certain hardware or software configurations, especially if newer technologies are not supported.
  • Performance Overheads
    Creating an image from a configured system may induce resource usage and time overheads, which could inconvenience users with limited system capabilities.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Linux Live Kit and Distroshare Ubuntu Imager)
Time Tracking
56 56%
44% 44
Personal Finance
56 56%
44% 44
OS & Utilities
55 55%
45% 45
Tool
53 53%
47% 47

User comments

Share your experience with using Linux Live Kit and Distroshare Ubuntu Imager. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Linux Live Kit seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Linux Live Kit mentions (1)

  • Is it possible to use "Linux Live Kit" on Fedora or similar distros? (RHEL, CentOS, Rocky, etc.)
    Out of curiosity, is it possible to use linux live kit (linux-live.org) on Fedora or similar distributions? Has anyone tried? If yes, what modifications are needed to be made to the script or the operating system? Source: about 3 years ago

Distroshare Ubuntu Imager mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Distroshare Ubuntu Imager yet. Tracking of Distroshare Ubuntu Imager recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Linux Live Kit and Distroshare Ubuntu Imager, you can also consider the following products

Pinguy Builder - A fork of Remastersys

Cubic - Cubic (Custom Ubuntu ISO Creator) is a GUI wizard to create a customized bootable Ubuntu Live CD...

Customizer - Ubuntu Live CD remastering tool.

mklivecd - LiveCD provides that platform for creating your own LiveCD based on Mandrake Linux.

Systemback - Simple system backup and restore application with extra features.

Mageia Control Center - MCC, or drakconf, is a system configuration tool forked from Mandriva by Mageia.