Linux Lite VS Garuda Linux

Linux Lite Reviews

1. Robin    

   student at college | over 1 year ago
   Awesome Tool Set, Sensible Menus

   In Linux Lite, applications are named for their function, not their “real” names. A newbie wouldn’t know that Evince is a pdf viewer or that Thunar is the file manager. Linux Lite is for novices who don’t know even what they don’t know. This one little thing is very thoughtful, all by itself. Linux Lite includes a magnificent set of tools to make maintaining and tweaking the OS effortless and non-stressful, with point-and-click simplicity and explanations for us non-tech types. If unsure, there are explanations and the support of this awesome forum, in which the Lead Developer actively participates. That is rare! You can even clean up systemd logs in a couple of mouse clicks! Lite Tweaks is probably the best point-and-click "cleaning and maintenance" application for any Linux distro.

   🏁 Competitors: Linux Mint, MX Linux

Garuda Linux Reviews

1. bartwalgraeve@gmail.com    

   over 2 years ago
   An all-round positive experience

   Garuda linux boots superfast on my laptop, is very userfriendly both in daily work and maintenance. You can find and install a vast amount of software and apps. It is stable and aesthetically pleasing.

   👍 Pros:    Super fast|Boot ime is amazing and all apps open quickly.|Very userfriendly

Linux Lite mentions (1)

• How do I hide my linux install so it looks like it doesn’t exist?

  They are using Linux Mint, but you can use something like Xubuntu or even Linux Lite, which would be a great option to run on slower hardware and especially a USB drive. Source: almost 3 years ago

Garuda Linux mentions (94)

• Linux hit over 3% desktop user share according to Statcounter

  I'd suggest trying Nobara and/or Garuda - both are absolutely easymode to install from a USB stick, and are specifically configured for gaming, but have a pretty different look and feel. Nobara is a very plain, kind of old fashioned, plain feeling UI (it rather reminds me of Windows 2000 in some ways, although it's much more advanced of course) while Garuda showcases just how fancy your desktop can look. Source: 10 months ago

• Reviving an old machine for gaming

  Garuda (Arch based, use a Desktop environment with small memory prints like XFCE or lxqt). Source: 11 months ago

• Please Help me for my search

  Personally, I feel like rolling release distros 'should' include a properly configured (GRUB-)Btrfs+Timeshit/Snapper by default. This will enable the user to rollback to a working system whenever a breakage occurs; even from the GRUB-menu. As the 'unadulterated' Arch is a blank slate upon which you 'should' tinker to your heart's content, it doesn't do this by default. However, you're highly encouraged to set it... Source: 11 months ago

• Is artix a good alternative to manjaro

  Personal recommendation would be Garuda Linux. Like Manjaro it is 'opinionated'; sets up (GRUB-)Btrfs+Timeshift/Snapper, comes with a bunch of very useful GUI-tools etc. Source: 11 months ago

• If you have a plan to use the galaxybook with linux, you don't have to buy Galaxybook.

  Yes... Most Linux Distro's the sound doesn't work... Garuda Linux is the only one I found that everything works. Source: 11 months ago