Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

LinearB VS Coveralls

Compare LinearB VS Coveralls and see what are their differences

LinearB logo LinearB

LinearB delivers software leaders the insights they need to make their engineering teams better through a real-time SaaS platform. Visibility into key metrics paired with automated improvement actions enables software leaders to deliver more.

Coveralls logo Coveralls

Coveralls is a code coverage history and tracking tool that tests coverage reports and statistics for engineering teams.
  • LinearB Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-19
  • Coveralls Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-24

LinearB videos

No LinearB videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Coveralls videos

High Quality Mens Work Clothing Long Sleeve Coveralls review

More videos:

  • Review - Scentlok coveralls review!

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to LinearB and Coveralls)
Data Dashboard
100 100%
0% 0
Code Coverage
37 37%
63% 63
Predictive Analytics
100 100%
0% 0
Code Analysis
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using LinearB and Coveralls. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, LinearB should be more popular than Coveralls. It has been mentiond 26 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

LinearB mentions (26)

  • 🦊 GitLab: A Python Script Calculating DORA Metrics
    LinearB is a SaaS solution that retrieves metrics overtime, some of them being used to calculate DORA Metrics. They also have a Youtube channel that advocate for DORA Metrics and more. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • 6 Proven Strategies For Being A Great Platform Engineer
    In helping engineering orgs get visibility into developer workflows with LinearB, Dan Lines and Ori Keren discovered that the majority of cycle time was being spent in pull request and code review. They found that:. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
  • How to consolidate metrics from across the entire organisation
    LinearB and there are a few cheaper alternatives. Ties in DORA metrics from gut repos and agile project management tools like JIRA. https://linearb.io. Source: 12 months ago
  • Measure Performance and Engagement Meaningfully
    You can also try these alternatives - LinearB, Jellyfish. Source: about 1 year ago
  • 'Software Engineering Dashboards: Types, Risks, and Future' by Margaret-Anne Storey & Christoph Treude
    Some recommended dashboard tools that you can try: Jellyfish, Typo, LinearB. Source: about 1 year ago
View more

Coveralls mentions (13)

  • GitHub Actions for Perl Development
    Cpan_coverage: This calculates the coverage of your test suite and reports the results. It also uploads the results to coveralls.io. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Perl Testing in 2023
    I will normally use GitHub Actions to automatically run my test suite on each push, on every major version of Perl I support. One of the test runs will load Devel::Cover and use it to upload test coverage data to Codecov and Coveralls. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • free-for.dev
    Coveralls.io — Display test coverage reports, free for Open Source. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Containers for Coverage
    Several years ago I got into Travis CI and set up lots of my GitHub repos so they automatically ran the tests each time I committed to the repo. Later on, I also worked out how to tie those test runs into Coveralls.io so I got pretty graphs of how my test coverage was looking. I gave a talk about what I had done. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Comprehensive coverage Jest+Playwright in Next.js TS
    This approach will create two json coverage files, which will be merged together by NYC. Therefore the results will be purely local. If You don't mind using online tools like Codecov or Coveralls for merging data from different tests, then go ahead and use them. They will probably also be more accurate. But if You still want to learn how to get coverage from E2E, then please read through. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing LinearB and Coveralls, you can also consider the following products

Waydev - Waydev analyzes your codebase from Github, Gitlab, Azure DevOps & Bitbucket to help you bring out the best in your engineers work.

CodeClimate - Code Climate provides automated code review for your apps, letting you fix quality and security issues before they hit production. We check every commit, branch and pull request for changes in quality and potential vulnerabilities.

GitPrime - GitPrime uses data from any Git based code repository to give management the software engineering metrics needed to move faster and optimize work patterns.

Codacy - Automatically reviews code style, security, duplication, complexity, and coverage on every change while tracking code quality throughout your sprints.

Swarmia - Swarmia is an engineering productivity software trusted by 600+ engineering teams worldwide. Use key engineering metrics to unblock the flow, align engineering with business objectives, and drive continuous improvement.

SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.