Software Alternatives & Reviews

Leiningen VS Ninja Build

Compare Leiningen VS Ninja Build and see what are their differences

Leiningen logo Leiningen

Leiningen: automating Clojure projects

Ninja Build logo Ninja Build

Ninja is a small build system with a focus on speed.
  • Leiningen Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-20
  • Ninja Build Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-14

Leiningen videos

Leiningen Versus The Ants (Project)

More videos:

  • Review - Leiningen vs the Ants Reading 1
  • Review - leiningen screencast

Ninja Build videos

FORTNITE STW: HERE IS THE BEST NINJA BUILD (AFTER MONTHS OF TESTING)

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Leiningen and Ninja Build)
Front End Package Manager
JavaScript Package Manager
JS Build Tools
22 22%
78% 78
Continuous Integration
20 20%
80% 80

User comments

Share your experience with using Leiningen and Ninja Build. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Ninja Build should be more popular than Leiningen. It has been mentiond 22 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Leiningen mentions (8)

  • Let's write a simple microservice in Clojure
    The project.clj file is a configuration file for Leiningen, a build automation and dependency management tool for Clojure. It specifies the project's metadata, dependencies, paths, and other settings necessary for building the project. Let's break down the libraries listed in the project.clj file into two groups: pure Java libraries and Clojure libraries, and describe each. - Source: dev.to / 9 days ago
  • The Current State of Clojure's Machine Learning Ecosystem
    Agreed. I started with lein, and still use lein for any 'production ready' project, but I'll use deps.edn for little personal scripts because in those cases lein feels like bloat. For me, using deps.edn was straightforward because of my previous experience with lein. There is a lot of strange shade in the Clojure community; like that thrown at lein. In addition to lein, the ones that get me a lot of negative... - Source: Hacker News / 30 days ago
  • One Simple Trick For Resolving Java Runtime Dependency Issues
    If you work with any JVM-based language, such as Java, Kotlin, Scala, Groovy, Clojure etc., you will most likely have come across build and dependency management tools such as Ant / Ivy, Maven, sbt, Leinengen or Gradle. - Source: dev.to / 30 days ago
  • Declarative Gradle is a cool thing I am afraid of: Maven strikes back
    NOTE: I won’t mention SBT and Leiningen here because, with all due respect, they are niche build tools. I also won’t discuss Kobalt for the same reason (besides, it’s no longer actively maintained). Additionally, I won’t touch upon Bazel and Buck in this context, mainly because I’m not very familiar with them. If you have insights or comments about these tools, please feel free to share them in the comments 👇. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Moving to deps.edn
    I've been using Clojure for ... Some time now; I think I started experimenting with it in 2009, possibly earlier. At both Aviso and Walmart I have used, and often fought with, Leiningen, the standard build tool. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
View more

Ninja Build mentions (22)

  • TypeScript's Successor is Waiting, and You'll Never Want to Turn Back
    Under the hood, Rescript uses a build system called Ninja. Ninja is similar to Make, but cross-platform and more minimal/performant. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Using Make – writing less Makefile
    Ninja was super easy to pick up even after using make for some time (10+ years). GN is just a ninja generator that is optional. https://gn.googlesource.com/gn/+/main/docs/quick_start.md https://ninja-build.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • Ask HN: What outdated tech are you still using and are perfectly happy with?
    Really? I thought most new projects were switching to ninja[^1] and have never used it. [^1]: https://ninja-build.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • What was used to build C++ programs before Cmake?
    Ninja showed real promise for a while, but then CMake grew up and people stopped seeing a reason to leave it behind. Source: 10 months ago
  • Building and Running Pidgin and Finch 3
    Now that you have your build system all generated you can go ahead and build everything. By default Meson will use Ninja as the build tool. Ninja is similar to Make but much much faster. You can also generate additional build systems but that's outside of the scope of this post. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Leiningen and Ninja Build, you can also consider the following products

Distcc - GitHub is where people build software. More than 27 million people use GitHub to discover, fork, and contribute to over 75 million projects.

GNU Make - GNU Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.

CMake - CMake is an open-source, cross-platform family of tools designed to build, test and package software.

SCons - SCons is an Open Source software construction tool—that is, a next-generation build tool.

Meson - Meson is an open source build system meant to be both extremely fast, and, even more importantly...

SBT - SBT is a build tool for Scala, like Ant or Maven but with hieroglyphics.