The post Alex Murdaugh’s lawyers filed ‘defective’ documents claiming jury tampering: Attorney General first appeared on Law & Crime. Source: 8 months ago

I really like this comment from lawandcrime.com user 'my wag'. Source: over 1 year ago

Honestly from what I've seen Meghann Caniff, Nancy Dillon and James Queally are the most unbiased. Meghann Caniff probably has the most informative tweets but they all writes articles at the end of the day summarizing what happened. Caniff writes for lawandcrime.com , Nancy Dillon writes for Rolling Stone and James Queally writes for LATimes. Source: over 1 year ago

Not a fan of that wording, lawandcrime.com! Admitted he has an addiction implies that it's indisputable that that's what it is. I have known a lot of addicts in my life, and they are (or in many cases unfortunately, were) normal fucking people who should not be lumped in with this abscess. Sometimes a cigar (by which I mean pedophile) is just a cigar (by which I mean pedophile). Source: over 1 year ago

As noted in lawandcrime.com ..article ..no clear indiana laws have been found that supports this sealing action and the court is denying this has anything to do with them. Source: over 1 year ago

If you want uncensored.. https://gab.ai. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago

I don't understand how you can stop spam yet not have the structures in place to censor forbidden views or opinions. Without admin moderation you get 50 million flavours of porn (like old Usenet servers) some of which will be illegal porn, a massive slice of QAnon and conspiracy (like Odyssee and gab.ai), information and propaganda useful to terrorists (like the old totse.com) and dark web drug markets. Source: about 2 years ago

This already exists in the "Dissenter browser" made by the folks over at gab.ai. This could work as a third party extension, but direct support from Brave would instantly draw controversy as it's perceived that the only reason Dissenter exists is to support toxic radical right wingers. Source: over 2 years ago

I feel that there is still space for a platform for content creators which is away from any restrictions. I was talking to a lawyer friend of mine about drafting a user agreement which makes it impossible for anyone to sue any content creator or the platform, or for any government or group to force removal of content. but in the end we figured that we would need a back to back agreement with our service... Source: almost 3 years ago