Konqueror VS Nemo

I recommend you try Pale Moon or Konqueror too if you're curious about other, smaller browsers that are also FOSS. Personally, I use Firefox, eww in Emacs, and Lynx (Lynx especially when I've got low bandwidth) but I'm trying to shift to Conkeror bc I prefer keyboard-based navigation. Source: over 1 year ago

Does konqueror[1] not work well enough? [1] https://apps.kde.org/konqueror/. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago

Konqueror - Used to be the file-manager up to KDE3 and still available. Source: over 2 years ago

Nemo worked well with GNOME 3, not sure about GNOME 4x. It is based on a very old version of nautilus. Source: over 1 year ago

For me is Nemo. Nemo is the file manager that Linux Mint maintains and uses by default in its desktop environment. It is a fork of Nautilus so is similar and migrating to it is painless. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

I did some research about it and I find that nautilus uses a plugin called gvfs-mtp to get support mtp, so I think maybe that is the problem. I tried to read the code but I dont know to much of programming in C, then I ask myself how is that nemo handles mtp, and tried to search in the source code, I searched here https://github.com/linuxmint/nemo but couldn't find nothing so Im asking here because I dont know to... Source: over 1 year ago

Nemo Cinnamon's file manager, I love how customizable it is, even if it looks worse than Nautilus :(. Source: almost 2 years ago

Nemo Cinnamon filemanager...afraid no clue how well it works in other DEs. Source: over 2 years ago