Kirby is particularly suitable for developers who appreciate coding flexibility and control over their CMS. It’s ideal for projects that require a tailored approach, whether for a personal portfolio, a small business site, or more intricate web applications. Content creators who favor a straightforward admin interface without the complexity of database management will also find Kirby appealing.
TYPO3 is recommended for medium to large enterprises, governmental organizations, and businesses that require a high level of customization and scalability in their CMS. It is particularly well-suited for users who have the technical expertise or resources to manage a more complex platform, or for those who anticipate significant growth and need a CMS that can scale accordingly.
Based on our record, Kirby seems to be a lot more popular than TYPO3. While we know about 43 links to Kirby, we've tracked only 1 mention of TYPO3. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
There are CMSes that work with static site generators. Static site generators do not imply that the input is markdown, though this is often the usecase. https://decapcms.org/ https://getkirby.com/ https://tina.io/ https://statamic.com/ ect ect. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
PHP based static file CMS (w/o database) to render markdown on the fly: * Kirby: https://getkirby.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
I gave October a pretty serious look about five or six years ago. I like the fact that you can code in the interface, which can feel more friendly than competing platforms. But I thought the community hadn’t reached a level of scale that I thought was enough that I could trust it. Also, I know that you have said you’re willing to pay and you’re not necessarily looking for FOSS, but I will point out there was some... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
If you have mostly static web sites with little work to update, you could try out the flat-file KirbyCMS: https://getkirby.com/ - it is a CMS I tried myself and liked quite much. I want to point out that it is not an open-source project like Wordpress, but a one-time licence fee you have to pay once you go live with your project. There is a great community around KirbyCMS who are building plugins for it, for... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
I have been using kirby (https://getkirby.com/) for all my (mostly non-dynamic) websites with great success the last few years. It's super stable, flexible, under active development and has a great ecosystem. Can't recommend it enough. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
But there was this TYPO3 CMS that I was actually always in contact with. Already at the very beginning when it was released I used it privately. In the first years of my second attempt as a freelancer, I used TYPO3 more and more, and got better and better at it. - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago
Statamic - Build better, easier to manage websites. Enjoy radical efficiency. It's everything you never knew you always wanted in a CMS.
WordPress - WordPress is web software you can use to create a beautiful website or blog. We like to say that WordPress is both free and priceless at the same time.
Craft CMS - Content management system built on Yii PHP Framework
Drupal - Drupal - the leading open-source CMS for ambitious digital experiences that reach your audience across multiple channels. Because we all have different needs, Drupal allows you to create a unique space in a world of cookie-cutter solutions.
Sitecake - Drag and drop CMS for HTML websites. It's flat file CMS so it's pretty fast.
ClassicPress - The WordPress fork. No Gutenberg. Great future!