Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

KDocker VS Battle Encoder Shirase

Compare KDocker VS Battle Encoder Shirase and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

KDocker logo KDocker

KDocker will help you dock any application into the system tray.

Battle Encoder Shirase logo Battle Encoder Shirase

Software that controls per-process CPU usage: an “active” software CPU cooler.
  • KDocker Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-02
  • Battle Encoder Shirase Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-15

KDocker features and specs

  • Cross-Desktop Compatibility
    KDocker works with various desktop environments such as KDE, GNOME, and Xfce, allowing it to be used across different Linux distributions without compatibility issues.
  • User-Friendly
    The tool provides a simple and intuitive interface, making it easy for users to minimize applications to the system tray without needing extensive technical knowledge.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source project, KDocker allows users to freely access, modify, and improve the source code, fostering a community-driven development model.
  • Resource Efficiency
    KDocker is lightweight and does not consume significant system resources, which makes it suitable for running on systems with limited hardware capabilities.
  • Customizable
    Users can configure KDocker to suit their preferences, such as setting icons or configuring specific applications to automatically dock at startup.

Possible disadvantages of KDocker

  • Limited Support
    As a project hosted on SourceForge, KDocker may not have extensive support or regular updates compared to more actively maintained software.
  • Dependency on X11
    KDocker relies on the X11 window system, which can pose compatibility issues for users on systems using newer display servers like Wayland.
  • Lack of Advanced Features
    While it covers basic system tray functionalities, KDocker lacks some advanced features found in other system tray utilities like multi-monitor support or advanced application management.
  • Potential Stability Issues
    Users might encounter stability issues or bugs due to less frequent updates and a smaller development community compared to major desktop integration tools.
  • Limited Documentation
    There is a scarcity of comprehensive documentation or tutorials for KDocker, which might pose challenges for new users trying to explore more advanced configurations.

Battle Encoder Shirase features and specs

  • CPU Limiting
    BES allows users to limit the CPU usage of specific applications, helping to prevent them from consuming too much processing power and potentially slowing down the system.
  • Freeware
    The software is available for free, making it accessible to users without any cost barrier.
  • Lightweight
    BES has a small footprint which means it does not use a lot of system resources and is easy to install and run.
  • User-Controlled
    Users have the ability to control how much CPU time an application receives, giving them flexibility in managing system performance.

Possible disadvantages of Battle Encoder Shirase

  • Limited Functionality
    BES is primarily focused on limiting CPU usage and doesn’t provide other performance management features like RAM or network bandwidth control.
  • Usability
    The user interface can be confusing for beginners and may require some time to fully understand how to use the software effectively.
  • Potential Instability
    Incorrectly configuring BES can lead to application instability, crashes, or degraded performance if the CPU is not adequately allocated.
  • Manual Management
    Users must manually configure the CPU limiting process for each application, which can be time-consuming especially for those with many applications requiring management.

KDocker videos

KDocker - Docks Programs To System Tray - Kubuntu 10.04

Battle Encoder Shirase videos

No Battle Encoder Shirase videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to KDocker and Battle Encoder Shirase)
Image Optimisation
100 100%
0% 0
Monitoring Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Window Manager
100 100%
0% 0
Command Line Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using KDocker and Battle Encoder Shirase. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing KDocker and Battle Encoder Shirase, you can also consider the following products

SmartSystemMenu - SmartSystemMenu extends system menu of all windows in the system

Kiwi application monitor - Kiwi application monitor is a small program which lets you monitor your applications/processes, Windows and User activity.

AllTray - AllTray is a program you can use on Unix-like systems such as GNU/Linux or FreeBSD running the X...

KillSwitch - KillSwitch is an advanced system monitoring tool that is apart of

stalonetray - Stalonetray is a stand-alone system tray (notification area) for X Window System/X11. Working with virtually any EWMH-compliant window manager, it has minimal build and run-time dependencies (X11 lib only). Complete XEMBED support under development.

Security Process Explorer - Security Process Explorer Give you detailed information about each and every process.